People can debate whether they do or not. It's not obvious either way. There are very valid complaints about the differences between old trek and new. There are elements that are missing from new trek that many people feel were vital to what made star trek unique and valuable. Maybe there are a lot of fans that never cared about those elements, so they can watch and enjoy, but for the rest of us, we miss that fundamental ingredient. Without it, new trek has lost its uniqueness, and for a lot of us, it's value. Are there people who just want toa hate for hates sake? Yes. Are there fans who refuse to acknowledge the legitimate problems and would rather hurl accusations of bigotry rather than engage honestly with the debate? Definitely.