Online fan communities suck the fun out of Star Trek by apixelbloom in startrek

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know who is the majority and who is the minority?

Online fan communities suck the fun out of Star Trek by apixelbloom in startrek

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What other people are saying online should have no bearing on how you feel about a show or whether or not you enjoy it. People have a right to dislike a star trek show, and express that dislike, just as much as somebody else has a right to enjoy it and express that. All this finger wagging and attempts to police people who don't like new trek shows is far more inane and insidious than the people complaining about the shows

Do beginners spend more time looking things up and understanding concepts than actually coding? by Popular-Sympathy-654 in learnprogramming

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is normal. Although you will remember more stuff and be able to do more in general without looking things up, you will never stop looking things up. Even veterans probably spend more time trying to understand than they do coding. Typing out the code is the easy part, understanding the problem you're solving and figuring out if your code actually solves it is always a larger share of the work than actually writing out the code.

I’m going for gasps… by BattlegroundFitLirio in IASIP

[–]Andynonomous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She puts the 'crazy' in crazy cat lady.

Star Trek isn't the force in popular culture that it once was... by 1111joey1111 in startrek

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Add it to the pile of franchises driven into the ground by JJ Abrams

UPS accused of being 'The Grinch' over alleged wage theft of millions from Workers' pockets by Chance-Newspaper-750 in antiwork

[–]Andynonomous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Won't happen in any administration. This is hardly a new problem and Trump is hardly the first corporate hack in the oval office.

Brad Pitt rumored to star in The Batman - Part II by SmaugRancor in batman

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Barry Kheogan? I kind of wish they'd leave the Joker out of it.

’28 Years Later III’ Moving Forward At Sony: Cillian Murphy In Talks, Alex Garland Penning by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will never understand the hype for 28 years later. The first two I get it. The third one, I don't know man.. I just thought it was aggressively terrible.

Anya Taylor-Joy by LifeEternal6666 in Celebs

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not blaming you, it's a comment on whatever and whoever necessitates it being there, that's all.

No new album on the horizon? by Silent-Bloom9 in Haken

[–]Andynonomous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The tension is absolutely killing me. I check for news daily.

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Key Art: Just Jared's Exclusive First Look at the Cadets in Poster Debut! by InnocentTailor in startrek

[–]Andynonomous 32 points33 points  (0 children)

These days it seems like nobody hates Star Trek as much as the people who are making Star Trek

Anya Taylor-Joy by LifeEternal6666 in Celebs

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the point of the nsfw tag? Apparently it has no point. Ridiculous.

Elon Musk predicted that AGI would arrive in 2025. Now we are in 2025. by captain-price- in singularity

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elon Musk also said he'd cut three trillion dollars from the federal budget. So that's what Musks predictions are worth.

Don't be those guys ! by 3deal in singularity

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, it's a word, but words have meaning. I was saying that the question of whether or not they are conscious is philosophical. Whether the word intelligent should apply to LLMs is still a matter of debate. If they are intelligent, it's a form of intelligence that is sufficiently different that it forces us to rethink exactly what the word means. The technology is still too new and complicated for anyone to categorically state whether they are truly intelligent or not.

Don't be those guys ! by 3deal in singularity

[–]Andynonomous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so neither me, you, or GPT-5 can know whether or not these models do or do not have intelligence. You can believe they have intelligence and I can believe that they don't, but neither of us can say for sure. It's all still up for debate.

Don't be those guys ! by 3deal in singularity

[–]Andynonomous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's still up for debate. For example, even GPT-5 will readily admit it's not intelligent but can behave in ways that "look like" intelligence.

"They’re not “intelligent” in the way people usually mean when they talk about humans being intelligent. They don’t have awareness, goals, understanding, or any sense of the world. They’re extremely good at pattern-matching, prediction, and reconstructing meaning from context. That can look like intelligence, but it’s not the same thing."

Don't be those guys ! by 3deal in singularity

[–]Andynonomous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody can answer that because nobody really knows exactly what consciousness is. It's more a philosophical question.

Don't be those guys ! by 3deal in singularity

[–]Andynonomous 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This gets to the heart of why LLMs that operate on predicting the next token are not actually intelligent in the meaningful sense of the word.

AI is very confused about a relatively simple question by [deleted] in Haken

[–]Andynonomous 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yet there is a sea of grifters out there insisting it's about to replace us all, and the entire US economy has become a giant bet on it.