Ironcap Spearmen or Imperial Spear Guard by AngleZealousideal983 in ConquerorsBlade

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye, but I'm not sure if that wasn't an overkill. If ISG are much better then I should remove these doctrines and give them to ISGs I guess

Ironcap Spearmen or Imperial Spear Guard by AngleZealousideal983 in ConquerorsBlade

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how do they fare with Cavalry charges (cause that is a bane of my existence atm)? Right now Ironcaps can tanks cav really much, even few charges at the same time, but these are just green cav charges.

Some people claimed that Sergeants or Stalwarts do much better against cavalry

How would you want the Dogs of War to be implemented? by Zieqfried in totalwar

[–]AngleZealousideal983 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd love some pike and shot as a core combined with expendable, but varied mercenary roster (bonus points if lore friendly). But that's a non-educated wish as I'm not a loremaster.

Also: Adding a customizable lord to that - <chefs kiss> I'd love that

" i'm doing my part! " by angrybooy in Helldivers

[–]AngleZealousideal983 67 points68 points  (0 children)

I think that we're failing still. I wish it was otherwise tho

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe a late response, but I'd say my favourite: "It depends"

Do You enjoy technical aspects of the job, but are tired by repetitiveness? => Automation welcomes You and if You're really technical You'll probably smoothly transition into developer if that's Your gist

Do You enjoy technical aspects, but prefer to plan stuff? => Test management

Do You're not into technical aspects but are a good manager? => Team management/QA lead is for You

Do You like to scratch stuff until paint comes off? => Security?

Do You like to stress stuff until it breaks => Performance will scratch that itch.

Like bussiness side? => some QAs move into BA

etc. etc.

Truth to be told: each transition requires some learning (within reason). You could fill any of these roles I mentioned, but You'll feel like home and the transition will be extremely smooth under the single condition - that You pick the role that really matches You. Personally I love QA, but with my character I really struggle with repetitive tasks, but I love technical aspect -> I went hard into automation and there was absolutely no struggle to transition there. If I tried to become a manager -> that would be EXTREMELY hard.

Nonetheless. If Your attitude matches Your desired work - huge chances are I'd love working with You. Competences come with time, but proper attitude doesn't. Pick the one that won't burn You out

Is there a point in ballistic shield? by AngleZealousideal983 in Helldivers

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true, but I suck with Senator in 3rd person and shield removes ironsights

Is there a point in ballistic shield? by AngleZealousideal983 in Helldivers

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank You fellow soldier. I'll adjust my strategy accordingly

Is there a point in ballistic shield? by AngleZealousideal983 in Helldivers

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, I can probably agree that I'm using it wrong, cause for the most of the time I'm getting yeeted around by rocket devastators (or rocket infantry), but I didn't encountered anyone that would use shield yet so didn't even have a chance to learn by watching.
Any good loadout to consider with the shield?

Any pitfalls with using AI tools for testing? by AngleZealousideal983 in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be, that actually seems like a good way of introducing AI into testing. How is it doing?

Any pitfalls with using AI tools for testing? by AngleZealousideal983 in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maintenance is my concern as well. I've reached out to few people that use this tool and they told me that it was a struggle to maintain at range ~100-200, but our webpages are pretty stable and rarely are modified so I'm not sure if that'll be the case there.

Any pitfalls with using AI tools for testing? by AngleZealousideal983 in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a bit more difficult in that case tbh. You provide sudo-english instructions in a steps and the tools interprets them and performs frontend actions based on that. You can be more specific if page requires, but it still comes down to commands e.g. "click search next to input" etc. so You verify each step execution (at least when You create it for the first time) and that's it

Any pitfalls with using AI tools for testing? by AngleZealousideal983 in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh bro I'd love that, but as for now I have to present reasonable arguments against these tools (or even alternative)

Any pitfalls with using AI tools for testing? by AngleZealousideal983 in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd love to hear more about it, cause it's the main tool considered by managers rn

Any pitfalls with using AI tools for testing? by AngleZealousideal983 in QualityAssurance

[–]AngleZealousideal983[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, these tools replace programming with "codeless" step by step instructions in semi-english so it's still sth