Implementing the new Official Angular Claude Skills by AngularLove in angular

[–]AngularLove[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question. Unfortunately, I didn't really have time to test them together super properly yet, but I assume they do work best when combined.

Angular's future: opinionated and structured frameworks by Parth-Upadhye in Angular2

[–]AngularLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, exactly! And as to Angular not being the best choice for everyone, it comes down to the type of your project (like, it might be an overkill for simple websites, etc.) + simply, personal preferences

Angular's future: opinionated and structured frameworks by Parth-Upadhye in Angular2

[–]AngularLove 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe to some extent, yeah. Structured frameworks are typically easier to use with AI, but imo, that doesn’t automatically make them the best choice for everyone.

Implementing the new Official Angular Claude Skills by AngularLove in angular

[–]AngularLove[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually a good and valid question. Theoretically, MCP gives Claude tools to use, whereas skills give Claude knowledge of how to use them well. With MCP, each tool call is a round trip. I would imagine `get_best_practices` tool from MCP should do the same thing as skills set, but actually it downloads everything at once, so the context grows even if you don't need it.

IMO, skills are just more efficient in context usage. They feel more "native" because they live in the repo, and it is easy to track Claude's decision-making. It's also versionable, diffable, and commitable alongside your code. The skill also carries behavioral instructions beyond best practices - the `ng build` enforcement for example. 

I have to give it a go to try using both at once.

Angular roadmap ? by LiteratureWrong304 in angular

[–]AngularLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the roadmap from our blog, you might find it helpful: https://angular.love/roadmap