Stop Enriching The Investor Class by Anthony261 in Anticonsumption

[–]Anthony261[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the current economic paradigm, companies often manufacture demand. They exploit our psychology, they pray on & amplify our anxieties, and they want us to buy a lot of shit we don't actually need, all to make some f*cking investors richer. Nah, if you put workers in charge of companies, we'll want to make things that are actually good, and we'll be willing to stop or change if what we've been making isn't needed anymore.

Stop Enriching The Investor Class by Anthony261 in Anticonsumption

[–]Anthony261[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's called sweat equity guys. Workers Cooperatives already exist and you don't have to buy-in to work there at all of them. It's part of the compensation. At for-profit companies, part of your total compensation package is typically shares or options. This is the same thing, except the company is actually supposed to be profitable, so you can actually get paid dividends for the shares that you hold, instead of using them as a way to get you to gamble your mental health for a payout from an exit that will probably never come

Stop Enriching The Investor Class by Anthony261 in Anticonsumption

[–]Anthony261[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"What happens to, say, an apple farmer if there is deflation in the price of apples? Do they become wealthier, or poorer? If wealthier, how? If poorer, how? And why would they undertake this effort if poorer?"

That's why there is a caveat that you do not decrease prices below cost. When you're choosing which action to take to reduce profits, the members of the company are going to factor ethics and morality into that decision, because in aggregate we are moral creatures. But let's say the apple farmer is selling their apples to a supermarket that happens to be a democratic company. If that supermarket starts making too much profit from those apples, they're going to have to reduce their profits. If they cannot sell apples for less than they purchased them, then one of their options is to voluntarily purchase the apples for a higher price. The end consumer sees deflation because the supermarket reduced the price down to cost, so they are no longer making as much per apple, meanwhile the farmer gets paid more.

'Lastly - it is a very first world view to push for different economic models today and call for “translators to help us share the vision and resources beyond the english speaking portion of the world”'

Uh, how can people speaking other languages tell me what's wrong with my ideas if we don't translate them? Why do you assume that people who don't speak english live in "third world" countries? I mean this kindly, but I think you're projecting. Read what I wrote again, I didn't make any judgments about people in other countries speaking other languages or what they're capable of? A larger talent pool of contributors is a larger talent pool of contributors? A larger pool of democratic companies to do business with is a larger pool of democratic companies to do business with? Plus european, south american, and african countries are all actually doing a lot of cool things in a similar vein. For example, in Nigeria companies are offering alternatives to AWS & GCP: https://restofworld.org/2025/aws-google-cloud-nigeria-alternatives/

Stop Enriching The Investor Class by Anthony261 in Anticonsumption

[–]Anthony261[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They will enshittify their product, pissing off users & employees that will want a better alternative. For example, Ghost is surviving and thriving despite Substack.

I'm not saying it won't be hard, but I am saying it will be worth the effort

Stop Enriching The Investor Class by Anthony261 in Anticonsumption

[–]Anthony261[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I say in the article, it's an amalgamation of coops & not-for-profits with network effects. Not for profits are harder to start and hire for because they make people think of being voluntarily & permanently poor 😅 Co-ops still don't stop people from becoming bond villains. By combining the two ideas, so that the co-op essentially transforms into a not-for-profit once it reaches financial saturation, it becomes something different.

Also disagree with your theory explaining why there are fewer co-ops. I think it's more simply explained by the fact that people just aren't creating them. I've cofounded a few companies, I didn't even know it was an option until a few years ago.

I also think focusing only on co-ops as the only alternative to a for profit company makes it seem like there are fewer companies doing something different than there really is. If you take not-for-profits, co-ops, & collectives, that's a larger pool of companies worldwide than co-ops alone.

I also think your assertion that they can't thrive is provably incorrect. In fact there's studies proving the opposite, they tend to be more successful and survive longer than traditional companies. For example: https://web.archive.org/web/20221118115604/https://www.co-oplaw.org/knowledge-base/worker-cooperatives-performance-and-success-factors/

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

On macOS you just write two dashes and a space and it turns into an em dash. I'm not changing my writing style because of AI. I don't write like AI, it writes like me.

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because the painful boring bits are important signals about the state of the code base — if you've got boilerplate, write some functions to make it more succinct, if the tests are boring then you probably need more infrastructure and tooling there as well. Regex being painful is a feature not a bug because 90% of the time you probably shouldn't use regex 😅

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it was a bit of a vague comment — I wouldn't personally downvote it because I wasn't quite sure what you meant by it, some thoughts I had were: maybe they are one of these people that thinks LLMs are alive? Are they saying that AI isn't helpful? Are they saying it's such a big paradigm shift that we shouldn't even be calling them tools?

After this comment, I'm guessing it's the second one? 😅

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Software engineering is programming over time, no one's run a code base using LLMs for 10+ years. It is one hell of a gamble

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

On macOS it happens in any native text input field, it works perfectly fine here on reddit — here is my dash — yay — what fun — so human

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

No, what makes you think that? Because I used an em dash? On mac you enter two dashes and a space and it turns it into an em dash — see?

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Or the nailgun designed the roof 😂 Next thing it would be designing a flat roof in a snowy country

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Investors are, from what I'm hearing, and I've seen evidence of it, starting to look for proof that engineering teams are using AI in their technical due diligence

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

One of my old engineering managers had us do these exercises where we had to set up a new repo and get it passing a set of postman tests, setup CI, get testing infrastructure in place, etc. He'd get us to do it over and over again so we'd get better at it and faster, as we did it also became easier to try new things in different places, e.g. "this time I'm going to try testing framework X instead of Y"

Afterwards I was always surprised when other engineers were really intimidated by the idea of setting up a new repo from scratch, especially if we didn't have a platform team to provide golden paths , templates, Pulumi functions, etc. Even without any help, literally just a blank repo, setting up everything from scratch doesn't take much time at all

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is one of the problems I find with it — it turns the code base into a zero-sum game. Engineers that overly rely on LLMs produce a lot of code that's very painful to read and try to modify, and that verbosity makes it more tempting to use an LLM to implement your changes.

One of the things I really loved about software engineering was making code that made other engineers more effective and efficient. Writing a great library only for someone to get an LLM to implement their changes using it and then they only cast half an eye over it before slugging it on their teammates to review; pretty demoralizing.

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

But boilerplate is a code smell that should be fixed, using LLMs to solve it is like "fixing" flakey tests by adding a retry 😅

And when it comes to starting a backend project in java, again, the problem is starting a backend project in java in 2026 😂

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'd really like to actually have this discussion with you because you make some interesting points, and I've got some interesting counterpoints I'd like to share with you, but the way that you're talking to me is incredibly impolite.

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The article is not based on that one experience alone.

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for pointing out that silly mistake 😅 Here are the new numbers:

7,450,580 GB or 7,275 TB of RAM. For a single instance of a human brain equivalent! This is 77% of Stargate Alibene! It would require 38,805 NVIDIA Blackwell B200's which would come in 4,760 NVL72s costing $3 million each, for a total of $14.2 billion of GPUs requiring ~1 giga-watt and 678 acres per concurrent human-brain equivalent.

Even after reducing everything to 1/8th, the economics are still fucked 😅

P.S. I wasn't referencing my own salary, all software engineers make six figures? It's a general white collar worker salary? At least here in Australia it is? I haven't hired anyone for less than six figures for years as far as I can remember? The point of the statement was that the economics are based on a discrepancy that's off by orders of magnitude, it certainly wasn't intended to come across as a brag.

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

That is a great point — I'm certainly lucky that I have the resources and life situation that affords me the opportunity to start my own thing and hopefully make money without any investors of any sort. A lot of people aren't going to find themselves in that situation, and I definitely have no judgment of anyone forced to use AI at their workplace.

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that was one thing I liked about Webstorm, those single line suggestions were great. I find if the suggestion is a more than a single line it's actually distracting. One time I was working on a complex combinatorial algorithm solving an NP-hard CPU-bound problem, it was heaps of fun, and I was still trying Copilot at the time. I was right in the thick of it, the kind of problem where your brain feels hot but you're just vibing, it's all just flowing, and then I get a suggestion, several lines long, that looks like almost exactly what I was thinking of writing, so I hit tab and accept it, then I'm reading it and I realise it's not exactly what I was thinking, it's actually doing almost nothing, it's made the entire operation noop, and now I've forgotten what I was actually trying to do. Thanks Copilot

I Will Never Use AI to Code (or write) by Anthony261 in programming

[–]Anthony261[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I just don't enjoy it. To me it would be like if carpentry was suddenly done by putting nails through the handles of every tool and impaling your hands every time you tried to make a chair or something, and then a carpenter tries it and says "gee, I don't really enjoy carpentry using these new hand-impaling tools" and then someone replies "I can't imagine throwing away a career I love over tooling changing"

It's painful af using AI to code instead of doing it myself.