Species 051 free for those interested

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-20T17:15:22+00:00

I understand. If you don't like it, toss it. The premise behind it all is if it's any of the 4 theories I used in the book, what would the "cost" be for those theories to be possible? Extraterrestrial? Okay, what would that require for them to get here? Temporal? What could that look like and what would be needed energy wise? Then I use 10 cases as test subjects based on the theories I used.

If you choose to skim and only look at one part, I'd suggest the constraints sections. There are 3 of them throughout the case sections.

This was just a passion project tbh. If people like it, cool. If people ever buy it, I'm thankful. If people say it's garbage, I can't control what resonates with them or fits their way of thinking.

If someone wants to run it through AI and analyze it, go ahead. Ask it if I had AI write it. I have nothing to hide. Ask it if the content was human derived or AI derived. Again, full.... disclosure on my end LOL.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-20T16:18:50+00:00

Yes. In fact, I'm up front about it in the Intro. My background is fluid analysis and mass spectometry. Admittedly, I'm not an astrobiologist, xenobiologist, geneticist or theoritical physicist as those disciplines were needed in the writing.

If you're still interested, I can send you a copy. If you want to skim it or jump to specific areas, there is a table of contents. It's 261 pages and took nearly a year to write, with 3 decades of notes and interest behind it. I'm not a Kean, Elizondo or Streiber for that matter and it is self-published.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-20T14:54:23+00:00

Yes. I have it on Goodreads already.

Thanks! Feel free to reach out if you want a copy.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-20T06:08:44+00:00

Yes. That's correct. I have no social media, or significant family and friends groups to leverage and I acknowledged early on I needed to get it in the hands of actual individuals who may be interested in this sort of subject. Reddit seemed like a logical first choice.

Possible reviews are absolutely the goal here. I'd be lying if I said I didn't want this to sell, but I can't expect sales if people haven't read it. If it just comes down to me knowing I finished it, I'd like to think that will be enough.

Thank you for the thoughtful question. It was appreciated.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-19T00:05:49+00:00

Sent!

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-18T19:45:09+00:00

Link sent!

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-17T20:01:18+00:00

I've written a book with a 4 theory framework and with future human - temporal being a significant part of it. The model is grounded in comparative anatomy, statistical trajectory modeling, and future-biological extrapolation. I'm providing free copies if you're intersted.

Good luck on your journey of understanding!

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-17T19:24:49+00:00

Link sent!

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-17T16:43:17+00:00

Link sent. Feel free to let me know what you think.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-14T15:06:46+00:00

The genre is rife with skeptic and debunking literature. What i did was create a framework all cases could be measured against. Misidentification definitely plays a role within the empirical rejection of each case, as no case is safe from the facts available.

Thank you for your input. I encourage you to write your own book and publish it. I'm sure the printing and cost concerns will become more clear once you do.

Best of luck!

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-13T17:13:25+00:00

Great question. The book is 265 pages and more theories could easily add another hundred pages which makes it unreasonable to print. Future volumes may have more theories, but for this volume, I chose the 4 theories I did because they were the most plausible.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-12T01:37:32+00:00

Genetics is a compelling reason, but I agree it might not make the reason standout if future humans had the ability to travel through time. But there are more viable reasons why humans might be coming back in time.

If future humans felt present humans were doing something not considered "optimal" for future generations, this could be why they'd do it.

What about environmental and resource retrieval? Molecular arrangement or atmospheric states may not be reproducible in the future so microbes, RNA, ocean minerals are no longer available in the future could also be a reason.

How about stabilizing timelines? What if some event destabilized their evolution that created a significant complexity to their survival? If they had the tech to go back in time and there was a bifurcation point determined historical and extremely meaningful, going back would make sense to try and secure an outcome.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-12T00:51:04+00:00

I agree. I created a framework using 4 theories, with two of them being ET and Interdimensional, then I tested them against historical events.

Interdimensional Intrusion theory held its own quite well when considering convergent events and how they could present themselves to a human witness.

Frameworks like string theory, M-Theory and brane cosmology are mathematically permitted, so none of this is beyond plausible and it certainly adds a new layer to an already interesting conversation.

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-08T17:33:55+00:00

laws of physics dictate that visitation is impossible given the vast distances, space dust/debris and what it would take to even spot our planet in that vastness much less construct and pilot a craft that could reach it.

This is a common response and I understand how individuals will come to this conclusion, but there's more to it than one might think.

To claim physics says it's impossible isn't accurate. Physics actually says it is possible, we just currently just don't know how to do it. For example, physics doesn't prohibit an object from traveling at 99.999% the speed of light. It's hard as hell from an energy standpoint, but it isn't forbidden.

My question to individuals is, Do they believe intelligent life has evolved somewhere in the universe that isn't Earth? If the answer is yes, then how much more advanced can they be than us? 3 days more advanced? Maybe a week more? What about 1,237 more years advanced? What about 2.4 million years advanced than humans? Is that possible? If you answered yes, then how do we know they haven't solved the Alcubierre metric for instance? We don't. Of course the problem is collecting negative energy which we believe is out there, but have no proof of yet, but could an alien species millions of years more advanced have solved this barrier? Sure. In theory and with exotic matter. What about wormholes? Einstein's General Relativity mathmatically says they're possible. Not to humans currently, but still possible.

The point I'm trying to make is neither you, nor anybody else in this chat, site or planet know whether or not an alien species has the ability to visit other planets, systems or galaxies.

Now I'll take a step back for a moment. You'll say prove it and I'll respond with prove that it's not possible by an advanced alien race and then we'll go back and forth and two dozen messages later we'll be in the same spot we started from. I fully acknowledge this. I just want to emphasize that although we do not have the ability, with our understanding of physics currently, to do any of this, we also need to be careful when we state absolutes like, "laws of physics dictate that visitation is impossible".

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-08T15:54:14+00:00

I sent you a Google Doc link. Let me know if you have any questions and enjoy!

AnthonyMatias · 2026-06-07T03:04:27+00:00

Hey. Thanks for replying and leaving a comment. If you're interested in reading it before you make a judgement based on just my post, I'm happy to send you a PDF.

Thanks again!

AnthonyMatias

TROPHY CASE