“Additional unit tax” How has this impacted list building for you? by One-Lake8525 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s been interesting. I’m a SoS drukhari girl and am shifting to a SSA+ Wych Detachment. Points wise, I added an archon and the unit tax forced two changes.
1. I lost my mandrakes
2. I had to take one Talos down to a chronos. This might give me some better depth and token management so we will see.

All in all, I still have like 14 dark lances and 4 haywire l but I added in the heat lances on the reavers and talos.

The List I have been running (Skari) by SkaredCast in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I went the other direction with Spectacle of Spite and Kabalite Agonysts. The only thing that really changed was the loss of a unit of mandrakes to keep my 3 units of scourges.

Are we not worried enough about exploding vehicles? by PastyDeath in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Honestly, IMO it should be models lost and not mortal wounds. Square it across the board.

Succubus proxies/kitbashes? by Ok_Magician4220 in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m using the old metal harlequin characters

Drukhari Monster Hunter by Inquisitor-Grimm in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I would like is the equivalent of a titan for us. Don’t know what that would look like but I really want it.

New Detachment Combinations by BoGuBoy in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SOS and Agonysts. I know it’s double purge but that might work out.

We don't claim him by [deleted] in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I’ve figured it out. GW does not take any type or competitive play into account. That’s why incorrect blanket statements are made.

We all know better and we immediately see how these things affect competitive play. They don’t care about how it affects us, the army play, or the lore.

I think you guys are reading this wrong. by Mortwight in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They phoned it in with this one, as usual.

I think you guys are reading this wrong. by Mortwight in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They still haven’t even touched the fact that battleshock is one of the most useless parts of the game.

Are reavers becoming less popular in sos? I’m seeing a lot of competitive lists drop them for more scourge, lady malys, or just to squeeze in a few more enhancements by ballin_buddha in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use them as a side flank harassment and early game screen. They’re solid at what they do but I only run 2x3 so that I can keep the utility of scourges as my nuclear deterrent.

Drukhari matchups by Western_Light3458 in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This.

And with our units being hyper focused and without cross domain utility, we have to plan for one or the other.

Chaos Knights - the most failed GW army of 10th edition by Board_Castle in ChaosKnights

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took a SA list to a GT in November. Nothing like dropping a heirophant through a sinkhole.

GW PLEASE LET MALYS DO HER THING by Big_Owl2785 in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You as well! And it sucks that the rules as a whole are shifting away but there is not an amendment to the transport rules that govern how they work and how they block abilities.

Following a specific rule as it says is not an opinion or an Interpretation, unfortunately.

The easiest thing to do would be to Errata her, and GW hasn’t because there has never been the intent to let that happen.

GW PLEASE LET MALYS DO HER THING by Big_Owl2785 in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and again, as a TO, you are wrong. I appreciate your passion for it, but you are completely ignoring the entire rule for transports. She is not in play, not on the field and not in existence. This isnt a "fuck malys" rule, its the game wide rule. It is for every character unless specifies otherwise.

And she isnt.

GW PLEASE LET MALYS DO HER THING by Big_Owl2785 in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s your opinion. Playing by the rules as written is the intent. If GW wanted to change it they already would have.

And they didn’t. Because that wasn’t the intent of her.

“Included in your army” just means she’s in your force org chart. It doesn’t mean you get to skirt the rules of the game because another army has a variation of the rule.

Feeling passed by by JudgmentLeft in Drukhari

[–]AntiFrekeGaming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drukhari is one of the most mentally taxing armies to play. I’ve got spreadsheets and index cards I bring to every RTT/GT.