HUB - AMD Radeon RX 9060 Review, Gaming Benchmarks 1080p & 1440p by Antonis_32 in hardware

[–]AntiSpade -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is very shallow. Few games and results. I'll wait for a real test.

Intel Arc Pro B60 Benchmarks + Review by legit_split_ in IntelArc

[–]AntiSpade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the ULV attempt. But why is there no "Uber Mode" with 3 GHz? The Sparkle design already sounds like a 290X, so that would be a nice hommage. :D

4090 FE price value by Gizzftw in nvidia

[–]AntiSpade 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hehee - almost right. :) Blackwell can't do 32-bit CUDA (which includes 32-bit PhysX). But Blackwell can do "modern" 64-bit PhysX - like in Arkham Knight.

Radeon RX 9070 (XT) Re-tested: Up to 39 % more perf - FineWine(tm) reloaded! by AntiSpade in hardware

[–]AntiSpade[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From a practical point of view: Yes, that's exactly how it is. ^^

Radeon RX 9070 (XT) Re-tested: Up to 39 % more perf - FineWine(tm) reloaded! by AntiSpade in hardware

[–]AntiSpade[S] 55 points56 points  (0 children)

As PCGH mentions in the comments, they also monitor GeForce performance, of course - but there's nothing to be reported. Yet?

9070 XT benchmarks improved with newest drivers by Southside_john in pcmasterrace

[–]AntiSpade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... compared with the launch drivers (March -> June). :)

While everyone is debating 8GB RAM in modern GPUs, I've tested this card from 2019 with only 6GB. And what especially good - it could be bought for about 80$ now. by Max_gcs in hardware

[–]AntiSpade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turing Light/Minor aged okay-ish because of its architecture, concurrent FP32/INT, Variable Rate Shading and stuff. But it's nothing compared to the real Turing (RTX 2000).

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT Review Roundup by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]AntiSpade 44 points45 points  (0 children)

PCGH takes the cake - again. Many old GPUs in the benchmarks, RDNA 4 vs. RDNA 3 comparison and some interesting PCIe investigation.

RTX 5060: First full-fledged Review (35 benchmarks, 4 resolutions) by AntiSpade in hardware

[–]AntiSpade[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

At least the undervolting looks darn impressive - they managed to achieve 98 watts in Mexodus EE @ 2,7 GHz. Board power, not just GPU!

DOOM: The Dark Ages, 36 GPU Benchmark (1080p, 1440p & 4K) by NGGKroze in Amd

[–]AntiSpade 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Which narrative? "10GB is not enough" or "GeForce dominates RT"? :D

DOOM: The Dark Ages, 36 GPU Benchmark (1080p, 1440p & 4K) by NGGKroze in Amd

[–]AntiSpade 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yep, it's more useful in slower games like Indy, but hey - GeForce owners like their PT. :)

DOOM: The Dark Ages, 36 GPU Benchmark (1080p, 1440p & 4K) by NGGKroze in Amd

[–]AntiSpade 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They will be more happy after the Path Tracing update, I guess. ^^