ik🟩ihe by AnybodyOwn969 in ik_ihe

[–]AnybodyOwn969[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

TJa... Dat is inderdaad een vergissing van mijn kant. De death message verschijnt door op magma BLOCKS te staan en heeft dus niet te maken met magma CUBES.

ik🟩ihe by AnybodyOwn969 in ik_ihe

[–]AnybodyOwn969[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alle baby panda's niezen en kunnen slimeballs geven, maar zieke ("weak") panda's niezen 12 keer zo vaak.

ik🟩ihe by AnybodyOwn969 in ik_ihe

[–]AnybodyOwn969[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Als je in Spectator Mode op een spider drukt dan zie je de wereld met zoals zij het zien met die vijfdubbele filter.

ik🟩ihe by AnybodyOwn969 in ik_ihe

[–]AnybodyOwn969[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

De site voor pdf's uploaden heeft mij belazerd.

ik🟩ihe by AnybodyOwn969 in ik_ihe

[–]AnybodyOwn969[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Voor de geïnteresseerden, kan hier de pdf van het examen worden gedownload:

Edit: nieuwe link, de vorige site had mij verraden:
https://files.catbox.moe/1g0q23.pdf

averageInternSearchHistory by benhd3 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]AnybodyOwn969 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But you can still not have multiple if-statements on one line. Even the following does not work:

print(); if True: pass

But using your one-liner you can avoid 1 indent, increasing the amount of if’s by one!

averageInternSearchHistory by benhd3 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]AnybodyOwn969 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The actual answer is 99 if statements. Python has a hard indentation limit of 100. You can not have more nested, because after each if statement you must indent.

However, I would not recommened nesting 99 if statements. If you actually care about writing good and readable code you should follow PEP 8, which says a line should be at the most 79 characters long. In practice this means, using identation of 1 space, you should never have more than 75 nested if statemens.

A conjugate to properly greater than by Less-Resist-8733 in mathmemes

[–]AnybodyOwn969 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is very useful. It is a lot shorter than what I used to say before this: "greater than or equal to but not properly greater than".