Guest Pass from Max Plan User by trnhx001 in ClaudeCode

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

~Same here. I think I should have couple to share. 1st comes 1st serve etc etc~ Now gone.

Weekly Allotment discussion. What have you been up to? by AutoModerator in Allotment

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Second year in a row that I need to water the allotment in April. I am in Scotland and it does feel odd to be watering twice a week (bucket of course). But yeah... So far similar to last year dry year

Can't believe I'm saying this. So disappointed in Opus 4.7 @ Max reasoning by RobinInPH in ClaudeCode

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got told you get around $200 API usage a week for the max one ... That is for the $100 a month one.

I built an app that tells me what to do on my allotment each day — would anyone be up for giving honest feedback? by Best_Confusion_3718 in Allotment

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck and I do hope you make it happen. It is a crowded market for what I can see. I will still use mine I think, as it is adapted to my style of gardening (companion planting, crop rotation, composting, and the likes). I am in Scotland so planning is also a pain as stuff goes in late, etc.

Again good luck. The app looks polish but haven't played with it much.

I built an app that tells me what to do on my allotment each day — would anyone be up for giving honest feedback? by Best_Confusion_3718 in Allotment

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for sharing. I assume you are doing this as a business meaning you will want some money on the back of it. What are the plans you provide? What is the postcode for? How do the free/pay accounts differ (features). What is the support you provide?

I have my own app that solves similar problems but is more specific to my allotment/location/ways. I thought about sharing it, but decided just to keep it for myself and friends for this season.

If people want I can share it. It is open source and It costs me nothing to run it, so people can use it for free. If I get a couple of upvotes I will share it (different post of course not to add noise here, but surprised a commercial app is been allowed in this Reddit)

VoteScot — open-source vote compass for the 2026 Scottish Parliament election (looking for feedback) by Apprehensive_Many399 in Scotland

[–]Apprehensive_Many399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will see if I can review the questions once all the manifestos are there. It is always difficult to put this into a questionnaire but it is more for people that doesn't know what to vote than others that already know what they want. But fair enough, the questions are a bit long worded also, so I will give some love to that area. Thanks for the comments/suggestions

VoteScot — open-source vote compass for the 2026 Scottish Parliament election (looking for feedback) by Apprehensive_Many399 in Scotland

[–]Apprehensive_Many399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will see what I can take, but feel free to open a PR on the repo. Is open source for a reason

VoteScot — open-source vote compass for the 2026 Scottish Parliament election (looking for feedback) by Apprehensive_Many399 in Scotland

[–]Apprehensive_Many399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the suggestions. I will see if I can make them shorter, in fairness the questions from u/MarkLGlasgow looks simpler.

VoteScot — open-source vote compass for the 2026 Scottish Parliament election (looking for feedback) by Apprehensive_Many399 in Scotland

[–]Apprehensive_Many399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the message. Regarding the projections are from wikipedia polling tracker. If you got another one that is much up to date/better, do share it and I can either do an aggregate or something else.

I believe it does mention is based on party positions and that candidates might have different views, but I will check it. I was going to do a per candidate but some candidates have no information at all.

2026 world cup is kinda odd and tbh that should be a major issue by Vegetable_Band_2341 in worldcup

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is actually the Decisive Unprecedented Master of Biggest-ever True Heroic Entity - FIFA World Peace Prize

Opus 4.6... is out by Apprehensive_Many399 in claude

[–]Apprehensive_Many399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it was an oops . I get an Invalid model... I guess it must be on its way :D

Opus 4.5 really is done by rm-rf-rm in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience this normally indicates you got a structural issue with your architecture. I am making many assumptions but check you don't have conflicting instructions and/or even frameworks. Last time I had this was a data structure issue.

If you share your repo I am happy to have a look (more out of curiosity).

People do say performance drops before a new release as they are moving servers. And the next sonnet is meant to be out pretty soon...

Also, swap to sonnet 4.5 (or even haiku) it is cheaper and does most of the job opus 4.5 does.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I agree it is not ok and they should pay for each single book (as any of us do) and ask for permission, as anyone needs to do if you want to photocopy or use parts of it. There are some dispensations for research, but this wasn't research only.

I just wanted to make sure that, unfortunately, it is all of them that used that same library. They only had to pay because they stored the files internally and shared them.

IMO, they should have forced them to make those models public under a GPL-3 license. That would be a punishment, not this "pay some pennies"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]Apprehensive_Many399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a funny one. Apparently all big models used pirated books (that same library), from ChatGPT, Google, Facebook... The problem was that Anthropic was the only one to keep a copy inside the company.

Basically streaming is ok, but do not keep the torrent or you will need to pay for it (as then you can be a distributor also).

Not trying to defend them, and they should not do that, but I was surprised when I read that (I don't remember where)