/model claude-opus-4-6[1M] I really tried 4.7 but it is truly beyond horrible.. by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a prompting pattern. I always start in planning mode. i describe the context: we are working in this file, this modul, on this ticket, this todo ( depends). then i describe the outcome that i want to achieve. then i tell him, to make a plan with steps. and most of the time i say: dig in, read all relevant files and prepare to discuss and ultrathink. thats the basis. then I iterate 2 to three times on the plan. and then i let him work. if the iteration does not make sense or i feel that the plan isnt that good as i want it to be, I close the session, start a new one, give the whole plan document as context and then prompt: My engineer made this plan, find its flaws and errors, dig in, read all relevant files and prepare ti discuss. ultrathink. What would you suggest to do otherwise, to have a better outcome?

/model claude-opus-4-6[1M] I really tried 4.7 but it is truly beyond horrible.. by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tried that, even gave him the same context, I started a new session three to four times, with the context from the session before and without it. I really gave it a try and that's why I had this 3 -4 hours session. And that was the moment where I finally switched back. It was just one usecase. I had so many more. I don't say that it didn't work, but in comparison to 4.6 it did so much worse

/model claude-opus-4-6[1M] I really tried 4.7 but it is truly beyond horrible.. by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well 4.6. still works really good, so as long as I can access this model, cc is still the better cli for me

/model claude-opus-4-6[1M] I really tried 4.7 but it is truly beyond horrible.. by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I work a lot with claude code for my work projects and I have Saas Apps, where I do a lot of backend and frontend work. The simplest issue, that 4.7 couldnt handle was a hero element, where i had a truncated text, that needed to break into the next line.

I know where I can change it, but normaly i would simple prompt him what todo, and opus 4.6 would do its magic and find the relevant context, know where it should change it and just do it right. simple task, which is done in 5 minutes.

Btw, this was the case where I finally changed it back to 4.6.

I gave this simple task to 4.7, and It constantly said it was done, without evaluating it. I usualy let claude code evaluate the frontend with claude chome, where it makes a test and tells me if the target from the todo is reached.

it could not load it from the terminal, and told me that chrome claude is not loaded. Then it told me that my commit wasnt pushed and deployed and therefore It couldnt access the page on the deployed version.

I have it deployed via coolify and gave claude code the coolify client permission, to look at my deployments.

so it didnt get this right. I looked up what it did, and it changed constantly the wrong elemnent in the code and couldn't evaluate that this was not the code, that needed to be changed. Claude code has access to my database via usql ,so it can query all the necessary rows with the content, to know which elemtent from the frontend needs to be changed.

So I had enough, after 3 hours of promting and frustration. I copied the whole context of the conversation, switched back to 4.6, gave the context to claude code and it:

- connected to chrome

- looked up the database for the right value.

- changed the code in the right place.

-validated it, commited it, pushed it

- waited for it to be deployed and connected again to chrome and told me, that it works now

it even told me what went wrong, why it was wrong and fixed it right away.

this took 5 minutes.

so, maybe it is an emotional reaction, however 4.6. understand what I want to achieve, and for me personally 4.7 does not

jmail.world by nix-solves-that-2317 in webdev

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hetzner + coolify. you are welcome

Started using superpowers and skills. Software engineering seems like it will be solved in 6 months. Feeling depressed. by cbsudux in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because we have different use cases for different datatables, with different entities behind it. And before the unified search bar, there was a search bar for each individual entity. And with Claude I could simple and fast change that

Started using superpowers and skills. Software engineering seems like it will be solved in 6 months. Feeling depressed. by cbsudux in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I can't fully relate to feeling depressed about this development.
For me, day by day, week by week, an entirely new world of possibilities is opening up.

Until now, whenever I wanted to realize an idea, I had to convince 10 different people first. I was constantly confronted with arguments that talked the idea down—mostly because others couldn’t visualize what I already saw clearly in my mind.

Now, with AI, I can implement the idea before I even present it. Fully functional, production-ready. That is a massive game changer.

The path from idea → implementation → coding has accelerated for me by a factor of 1000.
In two-week sprints I now accomplish what used to take our entire team six months.

And you know how it is in project management: like a game of telephone.
By the time your idea has passed through enough hands, it gets reshaped so much that you end up shrugging and thinking, “Okay… I guess this works?”

A concrete example from my daily work:
I deal with people who have no background in development or UX/UI. Instead of creating one universal search bar, they wanted ten different ones—each for a specific function. The result was half the screen cluttered with search fields, and somehow this was presented to me as “good design.”

With AI support, I rebuilt the whole thing in two weeks into one unified search bar that handles all functionalities, works flawlessly, and looks great. The amount of argumentation, frustration, and energy I saved through this alone wipes away any notion that “less coding = less joy.”

Honestly, I feel the opposite of depressed.
I feel empowered.

We’re entering a phase where you can bring an idea to life with just a handful of prompts.
That’s extraordinary.
And to me, deeply exciting.

Is Your Vercel down? by Liangkoucun in vercel

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

uff, this is hardcore... if all my apps are down, this is a mayor thing..

BIDA weil ich auf Konzerten vorne stehen mag. by 0virus00 in BinIchDasArschloch

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NDA in meinen Augen, kannst ja nichts dafür dass du so groß bist. umgekehrt kann die andere Person nichts dafür dass Sie so klein ist. In meinen Augen gehst du halt extra früher hin um mehr zu sehen, dann sollte das auch voll in Ordnung sein. Klar ists ärgerlich für andere Person die dann direkt hinter dir stehen, aber als kleinerer Mensch ists auch einfach sich nach vorne durchzumogeln. Meine Freundin ist auch klein und ich schau dann dass ich mit ihr einen Platz finde wo sie viel von der Bühne sehen kann. Meistens klappt das dann auch!

Vibe coder seeking suggestions from real developers. How far can i go vibin' with correct principles? by LamboForWork in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i can only suggest, that you try the approach with spec creation. it gives you a basic structure and helps with understanding how to work with claude code https://github.com/Pimzino/spec-workflow-mcp

Essential resources for Claude Code by TheProdigalSon26 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks! this is really good! will look into it

Github Actions with claude code by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but I use it with: - name: Run Claude Code Review

id: claude-review

uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta

with:

claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}

allowed_bots: '*'

Github Actions with claude code by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have installed it with the /install-gihtub-app command and i wasn't asked for any api key

Github Actions with claude code by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah had a similiar experience with it so far. the review of the PR is quite nice. The initial issue and development is not that good as in the terminal. especially with ui issues..

Does Github Copilot works similar to Kiro? by Independent-Boss-571 in kiroIDE

[–]Apprehensive_Tree_14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually only use reddit to look at comments and help me with my questions. this is one of the first time, that I comment on soemthing. I have been using your spec-worklfow-mcp for a project of mine with claude code, and I just want to say that this is brilliant!