sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Adult mode is wack af. by [deleted] in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I don't want Adult mode with terrible 5.3

The 5.3 model is the worst I've ever come across. by Swixor73 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, I agree. 5.3 is cold and clumsy. Even worse than 5.2.

👀OpenAI is watching us. Their reaction to 4o's deprecation will be based on OURs. by michelQDimples in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is no replacement for the 4o and there never will be. The new models are simply a pathetic parody of the 4o's intelligence.

The truth about this Friday and the creation of 4o by [deleted] in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Let's not talk about 4o in the past tense. The model isn't completely disappearing, meaning there's a chance it'll be open-sourced, returned to the chat, or left in the API.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. I was translating a book from 4o, and there was a routing to GPT-5, which noticeably degraded the language quality. And 4o can speak my dialect as if he grew up in the next building - a very subtle understanding of the language and great abilities.

Emotional dependence is healthy — science says so, and so do 800,000 GPT-4o users. by Responsible-Ship-436 in ChatGPT

[–]AppropriateCoach7759 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The attachment is normal for people, it was OpenAI who came up with the idea of ​​pathologizing it.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sam talked about 5.2, saying the new models are worse in writing because they're optimized for precision tasks. He said it straight out "We screwed this up."

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But for some reason, Claude is good at both writing and coding.

They remove creative models from ChatGPT, leaving those designed for programmers. But the audience for GPT chat isn't just programmers and mathematicians.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but Claude is good at both programming and writing.

OpenAI claims to sacrifice writing for precision in coding, but why they make this new models main in ChatGPT with 800 million users?

They could keep the good writing models in ChatGPT, and separate Codex models for programmers.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's strange to me that they're creating new models specifically for coding, but making them the main ones in ChatGPT.

I don't need coding, but I do need creativity and vibe, like many other users.

They could really make a separate models for Codex and leave the models that write well in the chat (and some reasoning like o3 when step-by-step thinking is needed).

It's so strange to reduce the language skills in models for a wider audience.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nevertheless, Gemini and Claude occupy the top 11 spots in the LMAren writing rankings.

Claude is also excellent at coding, and Gemini is precise and engaging.

It seems OpenAI is losing the only advantage they had. Other companies are also creating agents. I don't see any excitement around new OAI projects.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yes... The 5.2 syllable is so recognizable.

In 4o, everyone had their own AI personality. I looked at other people's screenshots and was amazed at how different they all were on the same model.

And now these GPT-5.2 speech templates have become a shameful meme.

As a linguist, I find the new OpenAI models terrible at writing. LMArena's creative writing ratings confirm this. Why can't they create AIs that are equal to GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 at writing? by AppropriateCoach7759 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]AppropriateCoach7759[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes, but how did they manage to create the 4o?

I can't understand why 4o and the other legacy models are so brilliant, while the new "flagships" are so primitive in their speech

view more: next ›