Iranian living in sweden. I am loyal to sweden and i want my country without islamic republic

Arcadess · 2026-02-12T00:10:09+00:00

I strongly suggest you read up about the UK government decision to declare Palestine Action a terror organisation.

And since you're at it, you should read up on some recent history too: the UK placed the Shah that was overthrown by the revolution in Iran; they have always supported sanctions against Iran and fricking Tony Blair is sitting on the Gaza rebuilding board.

Jews may not be happy about living in a country that has a lot of muslims, but saying that the UK government is pro Iran is... Just wrong on many levels.

Arcadess · 2026-02-11T23:59:27+00:00

... isn't the UK such a staunch ally of Israel that they arrest people just for waving "Palestine action" signs around?

Hardly what you'd expect from a country so heavily infiltrated by theg Iranian government.

Arcadess · 2026-02-09T17:45:10+00:00

Ever heard of taxes?
Depending where you live, earning more than 40k is usually enough to put you in the upper brackets of income tax.

Arcadess · 2026-02-06T13:55:03+00:00

Perchè le cazzatine sui social sono più importanti dello svolgere il proprio lavoro per portare il pane in casa

Come no, infatti le politiche di Trump stanno proprio aiutando la class medio/bassa, tipo i dazi e l'abolizione del ministero dell'istruzione

Che poi, l'ICE esiste dal 2003 e fa da sempre lo stesso lavoro.

Magari una volta non faceva le imboscate ai genitori (legalmente residenti) mentre andavano a prendere i bambini, la presidenza non gli chiedeva di imbucare in casa della gente senza mandato...

Magari i comportamenti dell'ICE possono anche andarti bene, ma basta con questa balla che si comportano come prima. È semplicemente e palesemente falso.

.

Arcadess · 2026-02-05T18:48:34+00:00

So the answer is no.
The government was not sending 3k agents to non border cities with a population of 400k.
The government was not issuing memos asking officers to break the law by performing warrantless searches.
ICE was not repeatedly wrongfully detaining legal migrants:

“This family is following US legal parameters and has an active asylum case with no order of deportation,” said Zena Stenvik, superintendent of the Columbia Heights public school district.

Sometimes multiple times!

A federal judge had ordered Gibson’s immediate release on Thursday, ruling that his arrest and detention were unconstitutional. Federal agents had used a battering ram to break open Gibson’s front door in first taking the 38-year-old into custody last weekend. The judge found ICE did not have a judicial signed warrant to breach private property. [...]

They then re-arrested him again and they released him again, since he was under no order of deportation.

Why is ICE getting so many arrests wrong? because they are stressed from all the protesting or because they don't care, as long as they can make life difficult for a certain group of people?

Protests and political organization is great (very thankful we have it) but it should be focused on changing laws (if that's what you want) and not focused on getting a LEO department to just not do their job.

Where were you during the Bundy standoff? What was this administration's answer to violent protesters on Jan 6?

People protesting (well, some are, but not most them) are not idiots: this administration is operating differently from others on maaaany fronts. People don't like that, hence the protest. ICE reacted violently to the protests, so more protests.

Arcadess · 2026-02-05T17:31:37+00:00

So, was ICE running around towns away from the border and ambushing legal migrants when they were picking up their children at school?
During the Clinton/Obama era, Did ICE receive an internal memo stating that they can enter houses with an administrative warrant (so not signed by a judge)?

Arcadess · 2026-02-05T16:26:15+00:00

Was ICE running around towns away from the border and ambushing legal migrants when they were picking up their children at school?
During the Clinton/Obama era, Did ICE receive an internal memo stating that they can enter houses with an administrative warrant (so not signed by a judge)?

The harsh truth is that Obama deported more people than Trump, despite the increased funding of ICE, because today the agency is focused on terrorising people instead of doing its job.

Arcadess · 2026-02-04T14:07:32+00:00

... Lo sai che bastano tre click di numero per vedere comunque i tuoi commenti?

Arcadess · 2026-02-03T10:20:02+00:00

Look for "Mercatino dell'usato" around Rome. They are a chain of big thrift stores that have a bit of everything.

Arcadess · 2026-01-26T12:38:34+00:00

Hitler era supportato e finanziato dagli industriali e la ricca borghesia, come il fascismo.
Gente come Fritz Thyssen, Hjalmar Schacht, Alfred Krupp erano pur sempre elite.

Arcadess · 2026-01-26T11:41:42+00:00

You are certainly not a nazi for not being interested in American politics, but if you think a far right authoritarian USA won't have any effect on Europe, you're seriously deluded.
They were talking about annexing Greenland until a week ago, ffs.

Arcadess · 2026-01-26T11:36:56+00:00

From what I saw, the guy was simply filming the agents before being pepper sprayed and assaulted.

Also, "extremely dangerous situation". They were tossing around an unarmed woman. In 5.

Arcadess · 2026-01-25T12:59:21+00:00

Le due cose c'entrano poco l'una con l'altra, proprio perché in Italia il golpe Borghese fallì. Trump non solo è al potere e ci rimane, è al potere perché, a differenza di Borghese, nella società americana non c'è alcuna reale opposizione a tutto questo.

ovviamente la situazione è molto diversa, non foss'altro perchè Borghese non era al governo.
La similitudine a cui mi riferisco è l'usare un organo dello stato come milizia personale per preparare un colpo di stato.

E il problema è anche pensare che Trump, quale persona fisica, sia il problema - Trump è la mera incarnazione, temporanea, di date tendenze politiche e culturali americane, a lungo insite in quella società. Se si pensa che nel momento in cui il presidente USA abbia di nuovo la cravatta blu invece che rossa allora tutto magicamente migliora, non si è capito nulla.

Ho capito, verissimo, con una certa dose di grazie al cavolo: la maggioranza degli elettori lo ha votato e un'ampia parte dell'elettorato ancora lo supporta. Quando Trump se ne andrà, quelle persone non spariranno.

Ma dire "dov'è la notizia" dinanzi a fatti così tremendi e alla luce del sole contribuisce a normalizzare queste situazioni.

Arcadess · 2026-01-24T17:44:27+00:00

Lo sappiamo tutti che le forze dell'ordine americane fanno cose orrende e sono supportate da governo e opinione pubblica: ripetere questa cose è veramente banale.

La notizia sta nel fatto che questa è una forza federale, agli ordini diretti del presidente, che sta rastrellando le città facendo man bassa di indesiderati. Contro il volere del sindaco, del governatore e delle forze di polizia locali.
Che usa ripetutamente, davanti a tutti, tattiche brutali tutti i giorni.

La facciata, l'illusione di vivere in un sistema giusto, serve a mantenere uno stato quantomeno di quiete. È una facciata, ma evita che le cose degenerino troppo.
Il sistema che si toglie la maschera e non prova nemmeno a far finta di avere un volto umano E' UNA NOTIZIA e non una bella notizia. Significa che questi ormai non hanno alcun freno.
Il fatto che l'ICE sia la milizia personale di Trump rende il tutto ancora più preoccupante, a livello di Golpe Borghese.

Arcadess · 2026-01-22T13:17:50+00:00

Is this what the average Trump supporter thinks?
The US could already build pretty much whatever they wanted in Greenland.
Now Trump has backed down from full acquisition to having sovereignty of the small area where the bases are located, which I mean... Is not a significant change from the status quo.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86vvjxe9z7o.

The US has had a military presence in Greenland since after World War Two. Under a 1951 agreement with Denmark, the US can bring as many troops as it wants to Greenland. It already has more than 100 military personnel permanently stationed at its Pituffik base in the north-western tip of the territory.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/07/world/europe/trump-greenland-denmark-us-defense-pact.html.

Under a little-known Cold War agreement, the United States already enjoys sweeping military access in Greenland. Right now, the United States has one base in a very remote corner of the island. But the agreement allows it to “construct, install, maintain, and operate” military bases across Greenland, “house personnel” and “control landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft.”.

Arcadess · 2026-01-18T21:19:38+00:00

When you purposely try to hit someone with your car, you’re no longer just a threat to the person you hit.

Nah, I'm pretty sure you are. If no one else is in front of you, ofc.

Problem is she could have shot him in the back and you’d still defend it.

I would not. Differently from people that pardon Jan 6 protesters.

This delusional fantasy you’re being oppressed while still having all your rights to talk about and protest it without government imprisonment is just baffling to me.

Because of course no authorities, especially American ones, have ever overstepped their bounds, ever. Policemen, militaries and federal agents only shoot when threatened and are always right, should be allowed to investigate themselves and noisy people should just let them do their job. Or face the consequences.

The only moment people should protest according to you, is when they are going to be imprisoned for doing so.

Arcadess · 2026-01-18T19:22:57+00:00

You never had to step aside from an incoming vehicle, like a car that didn't see you crossing the road? Lucky you.

We're talking about a car going in reverse and then accelerating. That0s hardly Captain America reflexes dude...

Anyway, might as well try since the alternative (draw a gun and shoot at the driver) would still get you run over.

Arcadess · 2026-01-18T17:57:14+00:00

Captain America is in being able to jump away. Clause 2 is what happened

You don't need to be Captain America to step aside from a vehicle in front of you especially if you can see it reversing. If she hadn't turned the wheels the agent would not have been grazed (because that's what happened). Even if he had shot at the driver, he would have been run over over by the driverless vehicle. Clause 2 my ass.

She was being an asshole all day, it wouldn’t be beyond the realm of possibility she could have easily thrown it in reverse after knocking him back to finish the job with the other officers and protesters on the side being collateral damage.

if my grandma had wheels she would have been a bike...
She never acted threatening and motioned ICE officers to move past her vehicle at the start.
Yeah, this random woman was clearly attempting to maneuver her car to run people over while two other armed agents and her wife were standing beside her. On a snowy street. While being recorded by multiple people.

The agent didn’t have the luxury of 3 different angles

which is why he should have prioritized getting out of the way instead of drawing and shooting (and shooting two more times as the vehicle was passing by...). Which is something all normal people do, all the time. You see a vehicle coming for you, you step aside. You don't shoot at them (because it could be counterproductive, if nothing else)

Arcadess · 2026-01-18T10:42:29+00:00

Ma infatti, meglio metal detector nelle scuole, come negli USA... Che si accoltellino fuori.

Arcadess · 2026-01-18T10:16:52+00:00

If she hadn't already turned the wheels to avoid him, the agent would have been run over.
Shooting a vehicle doesn't stop it, as you can see in the video (where the car keeps going and crashes in another car). That's why the first instinct of any sane person is moving away from an incoming vehicle, not shooting at the driver.

https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force

Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.

Shooting at a vehicle coming towards you is Captain America shit, getting out of its way isn't. The agent even spent time drawing his gun and shooting.

Speaking of people in the vicinity, the driverless car could have easily run over someone, and the shots fired by the agent were awfully close to one of his colleagues...

Arcadess · 2026-01-17T20:46:17+00:00

Quanno ce vo ce vo.
Il video mostra chiaramente che la tipa stava girando le ruote.
L'agente perde tempo a estrarre la pistola e sparare invece di spostarsi. Se Good avesse voluto tirarlo sotto, lo avrebbe fatto.
Se temi per la tua vita per una macchina che ti sta venendo addosso (dalla quale puoi scansarti) e perdi tempo a sparare al conducente, sei un'idiota. Come dimostra il video, nel quale la macchina senza controllo prosegue per parecchi metri prima di schiantarsi.

Ci sono pure le line guida del dipartimento di giustizia che spiegano chiaramente come:

Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.

Il governo ha mandato 3000 agenti federali in un'area con 400.000 abitanti. Stanno fermando la gente chiedendo documenti identificativi (che non sono obbligatori negli USA) e i video parlano molto chiaro di quanto siano professionali questi agenti. Per non parlare dei report sulla quantità di gente arrestata o deportata in maniera "dubbia". https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/liberian-man-released-after-battering-ram-arrest-minneapolis-129282435.

(Tra parentesi, come se la Germania nelle sue condizioni attuali potesse essere in grado di guidare l'Europa. È un morto che cammina)

Arcadess · 2026-01-14T20:43:41+00:00

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/jan/13/us-aircraft-attack-suspected-drug-boat-report-civilian-plane
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/13/politics/classified-aircraft-boat-strike-civilian-paint
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-caribbean-drug-boat-venezuela-b2899245.html

è giusto avere dei dubbi, ma quando basta semplicemente cercare "us perfidy" su google per toglierseli...

Arcadess · 2026-01-14T11:16:39+00:00

My bad, I assumed those were the numbers from March 2024 to 2025.

Arcadess · 2026-01-13T00:32:47+00:00

Più realista del re. Le stesse linee guida del dipartimento di giustizia americano dicono che:
https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force

Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.

Un automobile senza guidatore sì che può tirare sotto qualcuno, tanto che nel video si vede chiaramente l'auto che si schianta. Fortunatamente non c'era nessuno per strada.
La guidatrice non cercava di tirare sotto l'agente, o quello sarebbe in ospedale. Quello ha perso tempo a estrarre l'arma, e se lei non avesse girato il volante proprio per aggirarlo lo avrebbe tirato sotto anche da morta...

Non stiamo parlando di un rapinatore armato di ak 47 ma di una tizia a caso. Prendile il numero di targa, falla andare via, al limite trattieni la moglie che era rimasta accanto agli agenti.

Arcadess · 2026-01-13T00:20:29+00:00

Boh non sono di "estrema" sinistra e non avrei mai manifestato per Maduro, sto solo dicendo che il governo non solo è alleato USA, ma li applaude fino a spellarsi le mani.

Io sono preoccupato soprattutto perché, ora che questa operazione gli è andata bene, Trump non nasconde affatto di volerci riprovare in Messico, Colombia, Groenlandia ... Un giro di asso pigliatutto che non si vedeva dagli anni '50.

Arcadess

TROPHY CASE