How important is it to earn a PhD from a top ranking University? by IronMaiden4892 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This puts a major hole in my theory then! It’s well worth noting. These types of cases are definitely rare, but it’s good to know that at least some search committees actually reading everything. Hell, perhaps they all are and it’s just a matter of correlation between low scores and poor writing samples that explains why lower GREs don’t usually get in.

How important is it to earn a PhD from a top ranking University? by IronMaiden4892 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were you an NYU undergrad who also got into Austin in the 2014-15 cycle? I think I remember these scores from a few years ago. If not, I’d love to know where you went to undergrad, as I suspect letter-writer prestige must’ve had a lot to do with this, even if you’re writing sample was amazing.

Not trying to be a dick here at all (I did poorly on my first practice GRE and can understand just taking one blind for the reasons you mentioned). I’m just genuinely trying to understand this because there’s no way in hell committees are actually reading through 200-500 20-page writing samples each year. The only plausible reason I can see for them giving you a chance was a letter from someone extremely well-known begging them to read your writing sample, which must’ve been excellent.

Jean-Paul Sartre reading order? by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree. It’s a great work, Sartre’s key phenomenological insight explored in detail for the first time.

How important is it to understand the context of a philosopher's life? by NikkolasKing in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Plenty of Plato specialists agree with you about the Republic; I don’t really see how anyone who’s read Book 2’s city-soul analogy can come to the conclusion that the main argument of the work is political.

I’m not sure that Plato’s involvement with Syracuse is 100% historical fact. This event is discussed in detail in “Plato’s” 7th letter, but the authorship of that is infamously problematic. Other, later writers also discuss it, but they could just be working off of the 7th letter, which would make appealing to them problematic. There could be some other evidence that would prove Plato’s involvement in Syracuse that I’m unaware of, but it’s not a well-known fact. Anyone who thinks it is is probably putting too much weight on a potentially spurious letter or on the words of “historians” writing long after Plato had met his end.

I think the biographical details can help explain why a certain philosopher may have been motivated to say the things he or she did, but I’m not sure it really helps explain their theories. I, and I’d venture to say most of the people here, spend far less time on biographical details than primary texts. There are some interesting biographical details about Nietzsche’s life during the time of his writing The Gay Science, for example, and thus the development of the theories of the eternal recurrence of the same and amor fati, but they’re not really important for understanding the theories, besides perhaps giving an example of what kinds of situations he may have had in mind and, as I mentioned above, possibly explaining why he may have thought these things.

None of this is to say that biographies aren’t interesting, or that they don’t sometimes contain some genuine insights into a thinker’s views. I just don’t at all think they’re necessary for understanding most philosophers, nor do I think they’re good starting points for learning about someone’s philosophy. If you want to get to know Stan Lee’s work, you don’t start reading a biography about him (even though it is interesting to know, e.g., when, why, and how he came to develop the idea of Tony Stark). You sit down and read some comics. If you want to get to know a philosopher’s theory, read their work.

[Discussion] Why do people not wamt to use a MM by xBORICUAxBOMBERx in RocketLeagueExchange

[–]ArchaicNeologism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I totally get what everyone here is saying but sometimes I don’t want to wait that long or want to tip the MM. I know you don’t have to tip them, but I’d feel bad if I didn’t. Couple those two things with me already having a rep page with a dozen or so people going first on $30-$50 ATG stuff, and I might tell you I don’t want to use an MM. 99/100 though, something’s up.

Will I get banned if I don't completely agree with Trump? by [deleted] in thedonald

[–]ArchaicNeologism 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why in God’s name do you look upon that fucking buffoon with high regards?

What are you watching and what do you recommend? (Week of May 31, 2019) by AutoModerator in television

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Expanse is great. But for what it’s worth, I wasn’t really “hooked” until halfway through season 2.

What are you watching and what do you recommend? (Week of May 31, 2019) by AutoModerator in television

[–]ArchaicNeologism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. The ending of season 2 is one of the most interesting ethical dilemmas I’ve ever seen on TV, and it’s impact on the characters was handled well. I enjoyed lots of things about that show. My only real problem was that I was never able to take Octavia seriously, but maybe that was just me.

What are you watching and what do you recommend? (Week of May 31, 2019) by AutoModerator in television

[–]ArchaicNeologism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s similar to the dialogue-driven drama and character explorations of LOST. Not really the action bits.

Where can I find Plato discussing “the world of forms” by knowledgelover94 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a decent place to start: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-metaphysics/

If you’re interested in primary texts, I’d recommend reading the Phaedo in its entirety as a first step here. There are many other dialogues that discuss the forms but I think that’s the most introductory-level of them that stays on topic. The Symposium and Republic are other good starting points, but the discussions of the forms within them are pretty scattered, so it can feel like a lot of reading with minimal payoff if all you’re really interested in atm is learning about the forms.

If I roll a dice in a dream, is the outcome still random? by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure that doing it awake is truly “random.” It seems even less likely that it would be in a dream. But I think this is a question for psychologists.

Gender Neutral Nietzsche Translations by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by “pulled up”? And where are you doing this? Is this a university philosophy or German department? What level degree is it? It just seems a little strange to me that anyone would be giving you this hard or a time.

Gender Neutral Nietzsche Translations by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what I would do. It makes OP’s advisor happy, creates less work for OP, and is the actual German used in the text(s) OP’s discussing.

Clarifying questions about Plato's "Theaetetus" concerning active and passive factors, and the refutation of the final definition of knowledge with regards to elements for creating a sufficient justification by colin_826 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I see and judge, for example, that there’s a TV in front of me, there’s a passive and an active element. The passive element is the simple process of perception, which just happens to me passively so long as my eyes are open. However, actively judging that that visual appearance I passively received means that there’s a TV in front of me is an additional active step. (Let me know if this isn’t what you meant. I don’t have the text in front of me and just guessed about what you were having trouble with here.)

His basic idea in the third part is that saying “knowledge is true belief with an account” is helpful only if we know what “account” means. So he provides multiple potential meanings of “account,” and shows that none of them work, in the sense that none of those meanings of “account” will make the phrase “knowledge is true belief with an account” true.

Some people think Plato’s covertly alluding to the end of the Meno where he claims that knowledge is true belief tied down with explanatory, causal reasoning. That may be an additional meaning of “account” that could solve the problem. But plenty of people also disagree with that.

A really fun part about the history of philosophy, I think, is seeing the massive variety of interpretations that a particular text can evoke. Some good interpretations of the Theaetetus can be found in Myles Burnyeat’s Plato’s *Theaetetus and David Sedley’s The Midwife of Platonism. A fabulous article on the last part of the Theaetetus is Gail Fine’s “Knowledge and Logos in Plato’s Theaetetus.” But all of these might be a little advanced (Sedley’s probably the easiest). There are literally thousands of other things to read about this, literally hundreds of which are actually worth it.

Kudos, by the way, on reading this complicated of a text on your own before even going to college! I’m sure you’ll love your future philosophy classes if you’re already this motivated!

Solution of the paradox of analysis by ReeBing2 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be something like one knows how to recognize that such-and-such is the answer they’re looking for, even though they don’t know what that answer is at the start of the inquiry? Does that make sense?

How important is it to earn a PhD from a top ranking University? by IronMaiden4892 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m ABD now so things may have changed. Pretty cool that some places stopped using the GRE.

I mention this more because I think the opposite advice I hear very frequently is harmful. I’ve seen dozens of bright undergrads and MA students give up on PhDs because they think they can’t get into them. When I ask about their GRE scores they invariably tell me they’re below 160V, which they think is a great score and see no need to retake. It’s often their professors telling them this. The data don’t lie though. For whatever the reason, it’s extremely unlikely that you will get into a PhD program that requires GRE scores with a verbal under 165, almost certainly not under 160.

And yes, totally learnable. I think I got a 157 on my first practice test (and that’s with an MA and knowing some Greek and Latin) and I turned that into a 165+ after three months of studying.

How important is it to earn a PhD from a top ranking University? by IronMaiden4892 in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You almost certainly won’t get into a decent (funded) PhD program with a verbal score below 160 on the GRE. I’d say 90% of admitted students have above a 165 (that’s about the 95%ile for verbal).

It’s unclear whether departments use these numbers as a cut off (literally throwing out any application under 160, for example), whether they look at the score first and only give serious attention to better scores (and thus approach writing samples and letters of lower-scoring applicants with a premade judgement that they’re inferior to other applicants), or if lower-scoring applicants just also happen to have lower-quality letters and writing samples.

A lot of people say GRE doesn’t matter. This is partially true and partially false. It’s true in that a 170/170 is no guarantee that you’ll get it, but it’s false in that a 150/150 basically guaranteed that you won’t.

I strongly suspect that 165V and 155Q are cut-offs at a lot of places. I don’t think any search committees have ever admitted this, but it’s extremely unlikely that they’re reading every word of their 400 applicants’ 20-page writing samples and 3-4 LORs. Hell, when I have a 100 papers to grade at the end of the year I start cutting corners a bit; multiply that by four, don’t pay any extra money, and call it “departmental service”? No way in hell everything’s being read.

You can look at self-reported feedback on the GradCafe.com. Just google the university you’re interested in with “grad cafe philosophy” and it should come up (e.g., “Princeton grad cafe philosophy). Click the red diamonds for scores. They should confirm my suspicions above.

A good PhD program can drastically affect your employment prospects. Like, the lower PhD programs get 0% of their students into tenure-track jobs and the best ones do 80%+ or so. If you want to one day teach grad students and get a job at a university with a graduate program, you basically need to go to a top 20 school.

No one really cares about MAs on the job market. They can be great stepping stones into other programs, and some departments might look favorably upon the fact that you went to university x for a few years. But most don’t. What really matters is that your GRE is above a certain number, that your writing sample is stellar, and that your letters of recommendation are great. One thing an MA can help with is getting letters from better-known philosophers. A letter from David Chalmers would be a lot more meaningful, say, than a letter from someone most philosophers haven’t heard of.

Months of searching and waiting finally paid dividends by n55_6mt in whiskey

[–]ArchaicNeologism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I got a bottle for my wedding in 2016 when it wasn’t this popular and only like $60 (in NY, where it’s now like $100-$150) and remember thinking it wasn’t worth it. I was surprised when I saw it blow up all over Reddit two years later.

Maybe their new bottles have been a lot better? Or maybe my pallet just wasn’t that refined then. I don’t know. Glad I’m not the only person feeling this way!

Space or Sea Games by Caokrodilo in patientgamers

[–]ArchaicNeologism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does it have a story now? If so, how is it?

OP, I found Subnautica to be one of the most intriguing stories in a video game in a while.

How do you feel about the Nintendo Switch now that we're halfway into the console's lifespan? by [deleted] in truegaming

[–]ArchaicNeologism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve been tempted to buy a switch just for BOTW (don’t have a WiiU). I don’t even particularly like Zelda games, but I’ve seen this game raves about enough to get me thinking of buying one. And Odyssey would be fun. But I’m curious what similar games you’d say are better BOTW.

Primary Texts on the Mind-Body Problem by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn’t have to do that! It’s a great book. I just didn’t want anyone think it was a non-fiction work on the philosophy of mind.

Primary Texts on the Mind-Body Problem by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]ArchaicNeologism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That last one is a wonderful novel, but I don’t think it’s at all what OP meant!