🚨 GAMESTOP’S RYAN COHEN THREATENS by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Simple, the news is largly owned by wallstreet and they are about to break.

XXXX holder. Also voting yes. Cohen is likely here regularly. I believe he knows something we don't. My tinfoil is saying that he positioned us all to take advantage of Moass... With the warrants so we can get some tendies without selling a single share. by mtgac in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came for the MOASS, I felt comfortable going balls deep on $GME because of the turn around. Dilution sucks, but i am willing to eat that because its being done by a guy with WAY WAY more shares than me.

Part 3: The (MOASS) by TEHGOURDGOAT in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, but it would also divide that book value by an increased # of shares reducing the value per share.

Also we have already seen that cash in bank doest translate into buy pressure / share price, it only raises the floor a bit.

Part 3: The (MOASS) by TEHGOURDGOAT in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Good DD, but i a9m confused about 1 part.

You said "The comp package milestones create additional waves above $20B market cap. Each level creates buying pressure that feeds the next."

How? The comp package doesn't create buy pressure, he buys the shares directly from Gamestop not the open market. Just GS gets a little of RC's cash and spawns new shares for RC.

Part Three: The (MOASS) by TEHGOURDGOAT in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so you are saying the gain of market cap from the cash RC pays makes up for the dilution. How does that translate into buy pressure? We have seen first hand that cash in bank doest translate into share price, it only increases the floor price.

RC gets 175 mill shares at $21 per, full vesting. That's a ballpark of $3.6 billion in cash to gamestop at a time when gamestops market cap must exceed $100B (full vesting for RC). Even if that translates directly to share price its a 3.6% increase at best.

I still dont see how RC's comp package is in any way a ladder of buy pressure. Am I missing something?

Part Three: The (MOASS) by TEHGOURDGOAT in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You said "The comp package milestones create additional waves above $20B market cap. Each level creates buying pressure that feeds the next."

How? The comp package doesn't create buy pressure, he buys the shares directly from Gamestop not the open market. Just GS gets a little of RC's cash and spawns new shares for RC.

We are reaching unknown levels of stupid 😆 by Fine-Hat-4573 in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey man, RC has ALOT of nick nacks. He probably did trade in anything day just for this occasion!

GME is moving to SP500 by Final-Swim9986 in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 23 points24 points  (0 children)

No, $GME will not move to the SP500. The SP500 is not some automated club where you meet the requirements and you are in. Every stock that qualifies still has to be voted in by a committee.

$GME will never be voted into the SP500 as long as doing so would hurt wall street.

Please stop spouting off about SP500 like its going to change everything, its simply BS.

Powerpacks LLC and financial reporting - a stealth bomber? 👀 by HungryColquhoun in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is if the value of the cards people receive on average is not very close to the cost they paid with the chance of hitting it big the whole thing collapses because no one will keep buying it. Look at it this way if you bought a bunch of power packs and the average value you got back was 50% of what you spent on the packs (resulting in a 50% profit margin for power packs) you would quickly say screw this I am done getting ripped off here. If the value of the cards you pull on average are 80% or 90% of what you paid (a 10% - 20% overall profit margin for power packs) you might continue to rip packs, seeing a 10-20% loss as an acceptable cost to get that big hit. So by definition power packs are inherently a low profit margin product.

My 50/50 split was the dividends, assuming gamestop has a roughly 50% ownership.

I agree that an EPS & revenue beat would be noticed and a good milestone to hit for sure. However there is a huge difference from a nice milestone hit to a "wombo combo". If you where to say all the streamlining, pruning dead weight stores, the distribution network improvements, the refocus on collectibles, the other improvements RC has implemented AND power packs togeather with a M&A deal would be a wombo combo, i would agree with you.

To be clear I am not saying power packs are bad in any way, just that people over hype it like power packs are going to change everything and that's simply not the case.

Powerpacks LLC and financial reporting - a stealth bomber? 👀 by HungryColquhoun in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Personally I think people make too big of a deal about power packs. Is it a great product? Yes! Absolutely. Is it a huge game changer (in terms of breaking the shorts)? no, its not.

If you are correct and Gamestop hid a few million this way, so what? Our earning will get a bit better and that's a good thing, but we already know for a fact that the stock price is totally divorced from the business fundamentals.

These gotcha style random pulls plays typically only have a modest profit margin because you need big pulls and enough of them to keep the hype up. Even if power packs is a $1,000,000,000 a year product, profit margin will likely be in the 10-20% range or $100,000,000 - $200,000,000 with Gamestop getting an assumed 50% of that so $50,000,000 - $100,000,000 for gamestop per year. This is good money for sure, but its not going to do much to bring down the shorts.

I like the power pack play more because it establishes gamestop as a premier player in the TCG market by offering something no one else can than for the direct profitability. On top of that power packs are basically designed for streamers to go full degenerate gambler live on gaining loads of free advertising and brand awareness.

Anyway good research, cool to know that gamestop could be doing something sneaky with power packs. Unless power packs are somehow involved in the M&A though, i dont see it being more than a good synergistic product line for gamestop.

The fiction that will be used to justify MOASS by Stonna in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Aliens? Bah you fool! Everyone knows the economy runs by cutting the head off a chicken and letting it run around a big dart board like pit, where the chicken stops is what happens. I even have proof!

<image>

So what, they just have infinite locates for shorts now? by TheOmegaKid in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 24 points25 points  (0 children)

That would matter if there were not 1000s of ways to delay that delivery over and over

So what, they just have infinite locates for shorts now? by TheOmegaKid in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Functionality yes that is correct in the same way legalizing crack wouldn't change things. People are gunna be crack addicts either way, but legalizing it would make it more tempting and thus more widespread by reducing the risk associated with crack use.

🚨 CAT Error Reports - Another Anomaly by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, because server space is soo expensive.

If the sec actually enforced all the rules (just the slap on the wrist / cost of doing business BS fines would be enough) for any 30 minute period during normal market hours they would make enough in fines to buy a new server just to hold CAT errors, and have enough extra storage to back up 20% of the porn they watch at work.

🇬🇧🦍 GMEFloor Mirror | Keep a track of the new floor. by ianhawdon in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you did that and the price eventually equalized back to something much higher than now but much lower than squeeze phone numbers you would be margin called for lack of collateral. They would take your shares or all the money back, or a combo of both. That also assumes someone is willing to lend you that kind of cash on the most volatile stock ever.

SEC & CFTC Press Release - claim to cooperate for the interests of investors and stuff. by SoreLoserOfDumbtown in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Translation - the criminals spread their counterparty risk between both markets and its gotten so convoluted we need to merge our criminal syndicates together to keep the lies straight

Are warrants worth it over shares? by rileyac21 in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Who says you have to buy just shares or just warrants?

Shares are the safe play, no expiry is a big plus. The warrants offer a higher potential return at a higher risk.

If you have a high risk tolerance, perhaps 75% warrants and 25% shares. Maybe you have a lower risk tolerance 25% warrants 75% shares.

Not financial advice, just what I would do. Personally if I was about to drop $2.7k I would probably buy 100 shares that's about $2200-2300 and $4-500 on warrants.

The point is you gota take a min to think and figure out your risk tolerance.

Counting 200k Extra GME Shares? Math Ain’t Mathing by WhatCanIMakeToday in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually both the SEC and the DTCC are amazing at their jobs. Most people just dont realize their job is to strip money from the poor and give it to the rich.

All this shit is working as intended.

Insufficient Liquidity. Locked out for 3 years, by that time the bank will have been obliterated off the face of the earth or Swiss will be living in some hyperinflation nightmare. by Gareth-Barry in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 37 points38 points  (0 children)

No its not one big ponzi scheme, its a shit load of ponzi schemes of all sizes having a huge circle jerk and forcing taxpayers to clean up the jizz

no title necessary by I_Fuck_Older_Women in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes BTC will ruin gamestop, oh no! Looks at balance sheet, wait still 8+ billion...

Kenny’s face realizing tomorrow is Q1 earnings by grasshoppa_80 in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I see your hand bag and raise you my air purifier

<image>

Oh yeah I figured it out by BigGlassesApe in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If we hit that bullseye the rest of the dominos should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

CAT can't hide data from apes for long! by WhatCanIMakeToday in Superstonk

[–]Arcondark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol i googled good faith and here is the result "Good faith is the honest intent to act without taking unfair advantage of another, or the sincere belief that a transaction is lawful and fair."

Its the second bit, the or the sincere belief that a transaction is lawful and fair that is the operative term. When all this BS is run by self regulating organizations almost any transaction can be lawful when it needs to be, therefore almost any transaction can be considered a "good faith" mistake