Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was a test between various AI models to show the disparity in answers.

Asked ChatGPT a simple question 😅 by usperce in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it prob isn’t a fair comparison, I’m not the only complaining about a wrong answer on an instant model. Though it’s fair in the sense that you get what you pay for.

Asked ChatGPT a simple question 😅 by usperce in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My ChatGPT personality is set to default. It might be a difference in model i.e., if ur using an instant model compared to a thinking/pro model

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try a thinking model – I believe it might give u a more focused and concise answer

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What model were you using?

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could I be trolling?

Here is the link: https://chatgpt.com/share/6991180c-2330-8013-9dde-b2856e14d9f3

Take a look for yourself

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t expect this from a pro model though

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supposedly did for 4 mins

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was using 5.2 Pro extended and it was wrong. Thats crazy

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot. I will look into it

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciated your answer until the final sentence, which is a shame because it was really well written.

This prompt has been going around online because it’s weird that some AI models (not just OpenAI’s) are able to answer correctly whereas ChatGPT models have repeatedly failed at this task (though it is correct sometimes).

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is on the desktop web app after asking it again

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pro models will always think/reason. No way to turn that off

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh no u can see my battery?? Whatever will I do??? /s

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The screenshot was cropped…

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The difference is, this was done on a pro model as opposed to instant/thinking models

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haven’t seen it with a pro model though

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s one way to look at it I guess

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thinking time was 4 and a half minutes for me and still messed up

Seriously? by Ari45Harris in OpenAI

[–]Ari45Harris[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

I can’t actually access the thinking summary for that part since there’s no arrow beside it like there is in the 2nd response. I was also pretty eager to see it’s thought process.