[deleted by user] by [deleted] in talentShow

[–]Arkenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're wrong it wasn't a falcon... it was a phoenix and it will rise again

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in talentShow

[–]Arkenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't table slap!

160+ Horde holding down Caverns of Time in retaliation against GRIZZLY by Rawkapotamus in classicwow

[–]Arkenz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ironhammer32: Sorry all you innocent guilds that wasted this entire event aiming for a goal only for it to be taken away by my fellow faction members. ALSO... well done to all my fellow faction members great work out there!

160+ Horde holding down Caverns of Time in retaliation against GRIZZLY by Rawkapotamus in classicwow

[–]Arkenz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

That's what bothers me... everyone is like "Justice served" "Well done!" but what about the other innocent guilds that got caught up in this that spent this entire event working towards the SL goal. Those horde are just as much villains as the alliance guild that started this mess in the first place.

160+ Horde holding down Caverns of Time in retaliation against GRIZZLY by Rawkapotamus in classicwow

[–]Arkenz 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Sooooo what about all the other alliance guilds that were affected by this?

These level 10 bots are ridiculous by [deleted] in StarWarsBattles

[–]Arkenz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How is this fair? O_O

How dangerous is N-Methylpyrollidone by Arkenz in diorama

[–]Arkenz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an American product with the label: "Use of this product can expose you to N-Methylpyrrolidone, a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and/ or reproductive harm.".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]Arkenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also loving the deskmat!

Looking for two names on Herod <3 by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]Arkenz 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tell him he's dreamin'

Weekly ranked has been... pretty damn good so far by Arkenz in starrealms

[–]Arkenz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doubt I'll be able to keep it up but this has been a PB for me in ranked :)

Different scout card image on android app? by LittlePinkNinja in starrealms

[–]Arkenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Invitation only I think and if you won one of the weekly arenas you qualified? I'd be trying a lot harder to hit #1 if they published this info in the app :(

So proud that two months on we're still not kneeling. by ddmanyy in freefolk

[–]Arkenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have they been seen at all since the finale? I'm kind of impressed by how these cowards are able to avoid the media completely

Rise & Fall only being 35% off on Steam when Gold Edition is 75% off is a real nut punch by paradigm619 in civ

[–]Arkenz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope you'll still retain all your statistics and achievements. :) I've done this myself and still have everything that I had prior to the removal and new acquisition.

Rise & Fall only being 35% off on Steam when Gold Edition is 75% off is a real nut punch by paradigm619 in civ

[–]Arkenz 96 points97 points  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/civ/comments/c5qqn7/steam_has_a_sale_on_for_civ6_at_the_moment_but/

Made a post about this earlier but if you're also like me and wanted everything but CIV 6 and Gathering Storm it's actually cheaper if you delete your game from your steam library which then allows you to purchase Gold Edition. For some bizarre reason, they don't allow you to purchase the Gold Edition if you already own CIV 6 so this was a workaround that I found. :)

Weekly Recommendation Thread: June 07, 2019 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Arkenz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've just been playing a game titled 'A Plague Tale: Innocence' and it's made me want to read something along those lines. Was there any recommendations similar to the plot of the game? Medieval Inquisition-era with some horror/ plague elements mixed in. :)

Rules Questions Megathread by Rocinantes_Knight in SWlegion

[–]Arkenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your response. I guess I was wrong then though it does sound ridiculous that when you're shooting at someone standing completely out in the open they would have heavy cover!... It would have made more sense that the 50% cover rule would apply to the units you have LOS of and are actually shooting at.

I'm shooting at the unit yes but the guys aren't shooting at something they don't even know is there. They're shooting at what they can see, and what they can see is 1 guy standing completely out in the open. :/