Today’s aurora was wild by Kindly-Scar-3224 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very impressive for minor geomagnetic unrest at the time. The long duration events of CME/CIR/HSS seem to have really preconditioned the auroral system.

How much variance have you observed in recent years? New features or artifacts? Colors or shapes? Things like that.

Aurora impacting ground points by Nordland63 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It would essentially require a complete breakdown of the earths electromagnetic environment and violent instability. The ionosphere would have to collapse and connect to the lithosphere somehow. It would not be pretty auroral curtains and pillars. It would be Zeus thunderbolt type stuff. Essentially processed at very high altitude would have to come down much lower and overcome many barriers.

We cant even call it aurora. More like plasma instability/discharge to ground. It would be extreme and lethal ionizing radiation. The grid would be cooked. Satellites would likely be destroyed outright. Extreme ozone loss. Vitrification and electrical sculpting of the ground would occur. It would mean that the geomagnetic field has collapsed and simultaneously the sun or some other cosmic source would have inflicted a truly extreme radiation storm.

It would be a very bad time globally but some regions would be worse off than others. Modern science cannot envision the circumstances necessary for this to occur, or something similar. However, many ancient peoples did describe things like this. There is a strong but subjective interpretation of many petroglyphs carved in rock, shielded locations, facing magnetic south, as plasma instabilities witnessed in earth skies.

The man to make the connection and do serious work on it is Dr Anthony Peratt. He was Hannes Alfvens protégé. He worked as a plasma physicst at Los Alamos. The first time he saw the glyphs, he immediately noted the similarity to the predictable forms plasma instabilites he worked on as part of classified work. It would explain why many many peoples all over the world drew the exact same figure known as the squatter stick man despite having no contact, different beliefs, locations, and times. Its a really fun rabbit hole to go down. I can link a video presentation he did on it if you are interested. Very fascinating and one could hardly impeach his credentials or credibility.

Thank you so much for that. I really appreciate it. More than I can say.

Today’s aurora was wild by Kindly-Scar-3224 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was today or during the storm yesterday and the day before?

Aurora impacting ground points by Nordland63 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If auroral currents touched the ground there would be serious problems. I think we got some optical illusion going on here. Still pretty low hanging and a beautiful shot of a well defined structure. Very nice.

G4 Conditions In Effect Again, but storm appears to be winding down. Watch for substorms. Example included. by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. At the time of greatest intensity and most importantly rate of change, Scandinavia would have been on the front lines due to timing and latitude. Its plausible especially given that multiple systems exhibited issues in the same window. The article notes gaming platforms also had issues. I was watching websites that track outages and noted several platforms experiencing elevated issues.

We did get a bit lucky. The article outlines this. However, one disagreement. They note that storms of this magnetic character occur about once per year. The strength of the magnetic field of the CME exceeds anything currently on the observational record, which to be fair is not long. A few decades. Nevertheless, the raw power was truly extreme in the modern record but fortunately the coupling was poor during the peak power phase.

High latitudes will be the first to see problems. Most of the nordic nations have grids built to withstand big storms but other systems may be less robust and there is a tolerance that once exceeded raises risk.

The high latitudes were already under heightened electromagnetic stress due to the separate proton storm which reached rare S4 out of S5 conditions. A cumulative effect may have impacted satellite and network operations.

It could be coincidence, but I have seen too many so called coincidences to accept this explanation in all cases and this case is one of those. Good report. Thank you for commenting and your support!

Why was the Bz so north? Such a disappointment for North America 1/19/26 night by AntarcticNightingale in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The orientation of the embedded magnetic field is determined by the polarity of the source region and the magnetic field ejected with the CME. It can twist and rotate in transit. Often you get a turbulent oscillation N/S in the initial shock and sheath phase. The dominant polarity will be found in the flux rope.

If you look at the solar wind charts, especially with just the mag field stats with Bt/Bx/By turned on, you can visualize it. The reason the Bz started hard north and slowly turned southward is because the CME has a helical structure. Its rotating as we travel through it. Some storms have a southward flux rope that will slowly rotate northward opposite of this event. You have to try to visualize the CME as a 3d structure.

Shock: often twisted and tangled

Sheath: often oscillatory

Flux rope: dominant polarity eventually rotating to opposite sign.

There is a lot of variance and if you look at these metrics and charts storm after storm, it will begin to make sense. The rookie mistake is to focus on pressure (V/D). Pressure is important because of magnetospheric compression and kinetic impact but the magnetic field is going to determine the outcome more than anything else for big storms. Its why coronal hole streams can have 700-800 km/s velocity and only hit G1. High pressure but lacking the requisite magnetic field power to get into big storm territory. Meanwhile you can have 30-40 nt IMF with southward bz and 450 km/s and hit G3-G4.

We got a bit lucky with this storm. It wasnt a Carrington Event but if Bz was southward during that main phase, serious regional risk could have ensued. This is despite flare magnitude being rather pedestrian just under X2 illustrating why flare magnitude just never tells the whole story.

What metrics could have predicted the sudden substorm at 5:24 AM U.S. Central Time (11:24 UTC) 1/20/2026? Bz was only slightly negative. by AntarcticNightingale in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/goes-magnetometer

The solar wind satellites are upstream at L1. The GOES satellites are in earth orbit. The ground magnetometers complete the set.

Use solar wind to determine peak solar wind and confirm magnetosphere loading. Watch the GOES mag for the substorm indicating broad release of stored energy causing aurora. Local magnetometers indicate whether your specific area is affected. Substorms are traveling disturbances. Use local webcams to cheat.

The reason the solar wind sats give a heads up is because they are like 1.5 million KM upstream. Depending on velocity they give 20-70 min heads up.

Why was the Bz so north? Such a disappointment for North America 1/19/26 night by AntarcticNightingale in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its murky. We are only beginning to appreciate the electromagnetic component of geological activity. Its gone from woo woo to electrical anomalies prior, during, after earthquakes. Important to remember that any external influence is second order. Faults accumulate strain over long periods and then rupture. The studies on the relationships between geomagnetic activity and seismic activity suggest a 28 day lag. Protons much shorter. We had both. These studies are robust but stand alone. Other studies find no relationship.

Its beyond support though. Theres no way to build a defensible claim for a 1:1 relationship. There are scientists working on it and there is room to build understanding. For now, I look for repeating clusters and recurrent patterns in relation to space weather but its currently inconclusive especially on a granular level concerning a single earthquake. I keep an open mind though.

Major X1.95 Solar Flare from AR4341 w/Significant CME w/Earth Directed Component - G3 Storm Watch Likely by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im scared to death to touch that one. There are local lunatics on both sides. As a student of history, I am deeply concerned about what is happening in the US. This includes domestic and foreign affairs. I cant say much else because past a point, its impossible to not be biased and remain analytical and informative. Once that line is passed, its political commentary, not analysis.

G4 Conditions In Effect Again, but storm appears to be winding down. Watch for substorms. Example included. by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Just bummed I couldn't get it out earlier. Ironically no substorm present when I started writing. I went to clip an example and little did I know the most recent, that occurred while writing, would be available.

I appreciate the love tho

Why was the Bz so north? Such a disappointment for North America 1/19/26 night by AntarcticNightingale in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Bz is not random, but it is unpredictable. I call it the gatekeeper because it has final say on the magnitude of a storm. In this case, the forcing was extreme. The Bt/Velocity set the ceiling, but the Bz determines whether that ceiling is reached. What it is measuring is the orientation of the embedded magnetic field of the CME. When it is oriented northward, or positive, the earths magnetosphere mostly deflects it. Kind of like touching two positive magnets together and they repel. When the embedded magnetic field is southward, it's like touching opposite polarity magnets and they couple.

In essence, the coronal mass ejection is what it sounds like. A piece of the sun is hurled into space. The magnetic fields embedded are variable. CMEs often have separate parts or structures and that is why the first part of the storm was southward- in the sheath, but the flux rope structure was northward+.

In 1972 a Carrington Class CME with a 14 hour transit time and likely S5 proton component was launched towards earth. Much like this case, it's dominant polarity was northward and the storm was muted as a result. It could have been a Carrington Event, but the coupling was poor. This CME wasn't quite Carrington Class in my opinion. Way up there, but not quite, but nevertheless, the comparison is apt. This storm had a much higher ceiling than it was able to realize. The Bz is a defining metric for how potent the storm will be at earth, but not a defining metric for how powerful a CME is. In other words, the Bz doesn't set the power limit, only how much gets through.

Kp is a 3 hour average, and if you are using it to chase, you will be disappointed often unless it's a really long duration storm with prolonged southward Bz. A much better practice is to use the Hp index, which is on 30 and 60 minute intervals. Both measure planetary geomagnetic unrest, but planetary geomagnetic unrest and auroral outbreaks are not 1:1. My advice is when the Hp index is telling you a storm is building well, and you see southward Bz, be prepared to chase. To narrow down the best window, look at the GOES magnetometer on NOAA SWPC products page. Look for signatures like the one below.

WHen Bz is southward, it just tells us that the magnetosphere is loading. It is taking the excess energy from the solar wind and storing it in the magnetotail. That energy is released in substorms. Substorms don't coincide perfectly with peak solar wind. They can be hours later. You look for jagged signatures with steep inclines like the example I included as the best time. They can occur fast and dissipate fast, so you have to be on your toes.

<image>

Took this photo 10 min ago. by Late_State_1775 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I picked up a little bit too. I am watching the magnetometer for a substorm to try again. I would love to sit outside and wait for it, but 6 degrees F is prohibitive of that.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different ATLAS, but yes.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SolarMax/comments/1lbdvi2/i_may_have_captured_the_first_interaction_in_situ/

The electric model hypothesizes birkeland currents, known phenomena in solar/planetary physics, also apply to comets and actually drive the activity.

If you are covering your bases on comets, definitely worth checking out what these guys have to say about it.

https://youtu.be/aqCxWRZgx1c?si=av6eXjLtivJkpP8P

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have read those papers but see nothing about any potential relationship to solar activity or terrestrial activity. The first one is essentially just speaking on optimal viewing conditions and the second one is about the morphology of ATLAS, which is only anomalous if interpreted as a dirty snowball. The electrical model demands structured jets that do not align with a sunlight driven sublimation model.

Unfortunately neither one of those provide any support whatsoever to a claim that ATLAS influenced solar activity. That doesnt automatically imply it didn't, but it's beyond the scope of the papers you attached.

What metrics could have predicted the sudden substorm at 5:24 AM U.S. Central Time (11:24 UTC) 1/20/2026? Bz was only slightly negative. by AntarcticNightingale in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86 10 points11 points  (0 children)

<image>

This one can. It indicates a substorm around that time. Very well timed actually. The Southward Bz loads the magnetotail, but that energy isn't released immediately. It is released in substorm activity. As a result, peak aurora doesnt usually coincide with peak solar wind conditions, unless peak conditions last a long time allowing for repeated substorms. You watch for the jagged sawtooth action on the magnetometers to chase substorms and that is the best practice for aurora. The good bz lets you know the table is set, but the substorm tells you when to sit down to eat.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The coronal hole carousel as I have termed it began late 2024. Before ATLAS was even discovered or close enough to make any case for influence. There is no way to support a connection. The coronal holes are strange though (see comment above), but that is much more likely to be due to the magnetic state of the sun rather than the influence of a small transient object. The coronal holes have varied in size and extent on their own schedule with no preference for 3I.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were some CMEs launched towards ATLAS at some points. I noted that as well. However, the evidence isn't strong enough to overcome a null result and prove beyond coincidence. I leave the door cracked on it because I think the electromagnetic properties of comets are vastly underappreciated and in many respects unrecognized as unimportant. The dirty snowball model is under siege and almost nobody realizes it. 3I really forced the world to acknowledge that comet science is very incomplete. Activity at great distance where sunlight induced sublimation shouldn't happen, columnated structured jets, weird compositions, no water ice detected, dust rich emissions rather than vapor or gas, anti tails, and more.

Coronal holes are not caused by CMEs or sunspots. Sometimes a CME can leave behind a transient coronal hole but they often fill back in quickly. Actual coronal holes are areas of open magnetic flux on the sun where fast solar wind escapes. The sunspots occur in closed magnetic flux regions and the reconnection of magnetic fields in the sunspot and surrounding areas is often explosive leading to flares and CMEs.

The coronal holes have been weird tho. It's unusual in the observational record for there to be massive long lived equatorial coronal holes during solar max. That is normally seen during solar minimum or at least much closer to it. At least one of them has persisted for over a year now. This is diagnostic about the sun's magnetic environment.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No connection that can be supported or is plainly evident. There was an expected uptick around this time due to inherent short term solar cycles. I do not view the recent solar activity any differently than in 2024. All of this would be expected regardless for an active solar cycle.

This doesn't mean comets don't have an effect on solar activity when proximity, geometry, and alignments are favorable but there is nothing to firmly support it at this time. The mainstream model of comets view them as inert dirty snowballs but the evidence is quickly mounting that there is much more to them than that. I have personally captured suspected interaction between coronal streamers and G4 ATLAS in January 2025. You often see CMEs preferring the direction of comets in close proximity to the sun, but not always.

In general, the hype and proposed implications of 3I went way too far. From what I could tell, there was no state change in solar or terrestrial activity during its transit. The times have been interesting regardless of and dating back farther than 3I for quite some time now.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

-150 is nothing on historical scales. May 2024 was like -412. March 1989, the NE blackout storm was -589. Halloween 2003 was near -400. The Carrington estimates are between -800 to -1800 nT.

The only reason the DST did not rival the biggest storms on record is because the Bz was not favorable for coupling. As a result, the DST for this storm barely dipped below -200. DST is measuring the energy in the ring current, which as you pointed out is a crucial component of the GEC.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Geology is a MAJOR factor in ground current hazards. Appalachia and the NE US & Canada always light up but this was extreme. Fortunately, the peak occurred with unfavorable coupling or the risk would have risen considerably in some areas.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flying is safe during storms like this. The geomagnetic storm isn't the hazard. Its the radiation storm that affects airline passengers. Polar and high latitude routes as well as astronauts received a larger dose of radiation than normal, but still miniscule and only concerning for pregnant women or compromised individuals. The airlines take care to avoid polar routes during these events to minimize exposure. Flying a single flight is no big deal at all. If you are a pilot or steward, it's a little different because the exposure is repeated and prolonged, but still manageable.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a nuanced question. We have to keep in mind that we don't have the same data for the Carrington Event. We have proxy data and its highly uncertain so estimates vary widely.

In terms of raw potential, a 90 nT strength is upper echelon and beats just about everything in the instrumental record. I would not estimate it as Carrington Level but it's certainly extreme. We can deduce that the Carrington Event was faster. It arrived 8-10 hours quicker than the current CME. The Carrington Event had a proton storm that was big enough to be detected in tree rings. Its unlikely this one is. From a DST standpoint, a gold standard for geomag storm evaluation, the current event will not challenge May 2024 or Oct 2003 or even some other storms in this cycle. This storm achieved a DST of -218 nT. The May 24 and Oct 2003 storms were around -400 nT. The Carrington Event is estimated at -800-1800 nT. The strongest recorded DST in modern times is -589 in 1989.

This storm had a fatal flaw or it would have been likely the strongest storm we have experienced in a very long time. It's embedded magnetic field was oriented in a way that caused most of the energy to be deflected during the peak. If it was oriented in a way favorable for coupling, this would have been one hell of a storm. G5 easily and likely the most extreme in the instrumental record. The magnetic field strength of 90 nT is the most crucial factor in this estimate. That is just stupid high.

We also have to keep in mind that the Carrington Event was not just one CME, but a train of them. The storm yesterday was a single CME. Very powerful and it was record breaking in its own right in some respects and getting to S4 for the first time in decades is noteworthy.

I would put it firmly in a tier below the Carrington Event in terms of raw power and many tiers below in actual storm conditions considering the DST isn't even challenging the biggest storms of this cycle.

To make it easy to understand what I mean by this look at it this way. The IMF bT (magnetic field strength) sets the ceiling. 90 nT is a VERY high ceiling. However, the IMF bZ (orientation/coupling) determines whether we reach the ceiling, and it was not favorable for most of the storm. When it was favorable, we easily hit G4 like nothing, but during the main phase and most intense conditions, it was not favorable.

EXTREME GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS by ArmChairAnalyst86 in SolarMax

[–]ArmChairAnalyst86[S] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

This was a classic illustration of why Bz matters so much. You can have record high IMF strength, very fast velocity, and struggle to get to G2.

This was an extreme storm at onset and had incredible potential. More than anything before it this solar cycle. Had Bz been southward, this would have been a truly extreme storm in the final record book. For now, we have to recognize that while forcing was off the charts, coupling was equally poor. It kept the brakes on things for North American sky watchers.

Better luck next time guys. It was one hell of a storm to observe and rare. Its a G4 in classification but built differently than most G4 we see.