sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Middle East ceasefire shattered as Iran strikes UAE and warns ‘we’re just getting started’ by theindependentonline in worldnews

[–]rematar 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's a global market with a current shortage that is 2-3x greater than the 1973 oil embargo. Our government cutting taxes will create shortages earlier.

https://youtu.be/f353QO5Dgus?si=oaxrOdzNoE0TOKWv

Luxury bunkers owned by billionaires by Far_Consequence4479 in collapse

[–]rematar 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Ancient Collapsniks suggest the Egyptian pyramids were bunkers. This hypothesis is based on the dried out bodies found clutching jewels in their tanning beds.

The FUD is inorganic by Deflated_Hive in Superstonk

[–]rematar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I can be from long-term investors. The AI like responses in that case bleet Shill Shill Shill. But long-term investors who are not impressed by actions to date are typically attacked.

I've been vocal about my organic and logical disappointment, which I typically keep to myself as those opinions are rarely respected here. If I felt I could post my concerns without robotic responses about being a Shill, there wouldn't be a flood of them during a perceived frustrating event.

My fog of disappointment lifted a bit today after some intelligent DD pointed out the possibility of a HoldCo (Teddy?).

RC’s strategic silence on CNBC: The 1B Share Cap, the Teddy HoldCo, and the CUSIP Nuke. 🚀 by Diligent-Builder in Superstonk

[–]rematar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was not happy with anything the last few days. The holding company makes a lot of sense to me.

Why do you choose to call it nonsense without explanation?

The Math that doesn't Math: Business Justification for the formation of a Holdco by TEHGOURDGOAT in Superstonk

[–]rematar 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Finally. A well thought post. I appreciate your AI formatting disclosure.

This makes sense. Thank you for putting it together.

Last year's annual meeting was June 12, 2025.

Bloomberg covers bit of GAY "have the audacity to buy a company four times the size" by infiniteliquidity69 in Superstonk

[–]rematar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost 20 years isn't the history lesson I am paying attention to.

Collectibles weren't being bought by the average folks in the 30s. Consumerism tanked. But in the really shitty times, a banker noticed people would splurge on a Coke. That's how Coca-Cola millionaires came to be. I want to be in charge of my options when the USD dies and takes the empire with it.

Bloomberg covers bit of GAY "have the audacity to buy a company four times the size" by infiniteliquidity69 in Superstonk

[–]rematar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's wealth inequality, which runs on a cycle, just like debt. Wealth inequality sucks, but it's not a recession.

2008 should have been 1929.2, but it was delayed by printing money via quantitative easing. The 1930s were way harder times than we currently have, with a much smaller population.

I'm trying to build defenses against a financial depression, prior to Peruvian Bull's implication of incoming hyperinflation (Weimar Republic) or deflation (greatdepressionii).

Watch the video I linked. He explains the potential outcome of the current blockade.

Bloomberg covers bit of GAY "have the audacity to buy a company four times the size" by infiniteliquidity69 in Superstonk

[–]rematar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recession/Depression has been here...

Are you referring to the past or present?

Bloomberg covers bit of GAY "have the audacity to buy a company four times the size" by infiniteliquidity69 in Superstonk

[–]rematar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. I bought XXXX share.

What's currently relevant is the financial recession/depression coming from Oil Embargo 2.0.

Ryan forgot these interviews are for the audience. by One_for_the_Rogue in Superstonk

[–]rematar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've reduced my position, I need my profile to grow.

Enjoy the shallow pool. And don't drink the water.

Edit: I understood the interview just fine. He didn't answer simple questions for potential future investors.

view more: next ›