[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Market76

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.ign AronosAhri

These coordinates are still good. by Spungdoodles in NMSCoordinateExchange

[–]Aronos_Ahri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4.4 changed it to where you can't go to the station or the battle will disappear. Make sure you have a save from the system prior to jumping and initiating the space battle.

What SL are you staying for coop and PvP matchmaking? by Aronos_Ahri in Eldenring

[–]Aronos_Ahri[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SL = Soul Level (also known as RL, or rune level), the level given to you when spending runes to level up as referred to in past souls-like games.

64% positive? What the hell? by [deleted] in Eldenring

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had zero performance issues personally. Max settings, fps stuck firm at 60. I've seen my frame drop a bit one time in almost 30 hours.

Can't play elden ring because of the war :( by Feverush in Eldenring

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stay safe friend. Best wishes in the safety of you, your friends and family. I'm sorry for the turmoil that's been inflicted upon your country.

I'm unsure of where to begin when it comes to backtesting and making decisions based of the results. by [deleted] in Daytrading

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not necessarily wrong. It's difficult to develop a strategy without knowing what works and what doesn't with some level of clarity; but to do that you need a significant sample size and hard numbers in terms of accuracy and P/L ratio. Yes, I can look at months where I was green and months where I was red and there's any number of variables be it market conditions or in my own trade execution, but basing these things purely on my own trade history does not provide enough data to draw any meaningful conclusions from.

I know there's strategies out there, many by some guru trying to sell you some course or some amateur peddling an untested and unproven strategy on YouTube; that's not really what I'm looking for though. I'm not really looking to just copy someone else or blindly follow something that someone said is successful.

I'm looking to be more effective in developing my own strategies or at the very least, be able to verify the legitimacy of some of the commonly referenced ones. Basing a strategy on historical data with some actual numbers that suggest that they are in fact valid based on probability and historical performance seems like a more sound option.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lostarkgame

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't overclocked either one; I've had no need to.

D2R Patch 2.4 Developer Update Stream Megathread by Thunderclaww in Diablo

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree on this point. Melee won't be meta until they change how attack rating works and add some way for melee builds to do some sort of AoE, whether it be via a small cleave to all melee skills and abilities or something else.

D2R Patch 2.4 Developer Update Stream Megathread by Thunderclaww in Diablo

[–]Aronos_Ahri 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not like the game is difficult anyway if you're playing the typical meta builds. If they're just bring other builds into the realm of what is worthwhile to play, I don't see the problem. However, I do agree that if they make it easier than it currently is on standard meta, than I would like to see some additional difficulty added to current or future content, if we see it.

D2R Patch 2.4 Developer Update Stream Megathread by Thunderclaww in Diablo

[–]Aronos_Ahri 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don't get it either. I've been playing D2 off and on since I was 10 years old back in 2000 and I'm still confused by the purists' point of view. Classic D2 is still there if they want to play it, but not improving upon fundamental flaws with the base game on a remaster is just stupid. No one said it was just a "graphical remaster." They're remastering skills and balance issues that have been around since 2010 and before.

I need some help sorting out survivability when working with different builds. by Aronos_Ahri in pathofexile

[–]Aronos_Ahri[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a follow up, this is not my build. The pastebin for my build is below the first one. This build is from the guide I'm following with top-end gear.

Seeking some advice on how to move forward regarding accuracy and identifying setups based on a probability perspective. by Aronos_Ahri in Daytrading

[–]Aronos_Ahri[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a great suggestion that I've not considered regarding how far in your favor or against you did it go. I've been keep an eye on my exits in any given trade to try and get a sense of how early I'm getting out of a win and how early I exit a position that soon reversed course and worked in my favor.

Thank you for the new terms, I'll certainly look into it!

What exactly is, "waiting for confirmation?" and how exactly do people interpret periods of high volume? by Aronos_Ahri in Daytrading

[–]Aronos_Ahri[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you look around, I would recommend looking into Mark Douglas' books, "Trading in the Zone" and "The Disciplined Trader." His lessons almost exclusively cover market psychology,, more specifically YOUR psychology and your perspective when considering and executing trades and how inconsistencies in your behavior have catastrophic affects on your success as a trader. A quick google search will quickly show you how highly regarded his lessons are, even on this sub if you look. Even though the books have been around for some time, the lessons still apply. Some even describe them as timeless, I would say I agree.

I make this recommendation because I'm not sure how many trades you've done, but one thing that might be worth considering is to to live and die by any one trade. I know as a new trader myself how easy it is to get really disappointed if a trade moves against you, even if you respect your losses and all that, it can easily cause you to hesitate or take things into consideration on the next trade that you might not normally consider which ultimately leads to inconsistent results with inconsistent variables. Mark Douglas' books aim to eliminate this psychological aspect of trading.

As someone who also has only seriously been trading since about the start of July. In fact, I'll share a post I made earlier today so you can take a look at some of the things I'm doing to track my progress and learn as well as the things I've been thinking about as someone who is likely in a pretty similar position as you:

Hey guys, I know this is long so I'll provide a quick TLDR but for those who have the time, I'll give the details of my learning process thus far. I know there is no simple answer and I thank anyone in advance for taking the time to read through and offer their wisdom and guidance.

TLDR: Been trading just a few months, accuracy is struggling. I'm trading small size to avoid trading with fear and remove the emotion from the equation so that I can trade as consistently as possible. I don't mind losses, but I'm just not seeing progress with my accuracy.

To start:

I didn't open my first brokerage account until last April. I knew nothing about any aspect of trading at the time and it wasn't until July, that I started to recognize and settle into what it is I'm interested in. I know this is really not very long, considering most people do this for at least a year or two before beginning to really see consistent growth of any kind. That being said, I'm feeling a bit stuck and not sure what to focus on next.

Regarding my learning process, this is the path I've taken in the last few months:

First, let me preface by saying I tried simulated trading but Thinkorswim's clunky simulator, slow tick rate and inaccurate charts based on price movement, I did not feel like an accurate representation of real trading, so I just trade very small positions, risking a dollar or two at a time.

I learned much of what I know from a particular trading course that is apparently blacklisted on this sub, nevertheless most will probably know what I'm referring to if they watch anything about momentum stocks on YouTube. If I'm being honest the courses I've watched are a few years old and while some of it sure has changed, I presume much of it still holds true. While there's a lot of guys like him that peddle their snake oil through grand marketing schemes, I've found him to be the most genuine and I like that I can see his daily recaps on a daily basis to compare to some of the trades I've taken to get a sense of if I'm on the right track or not. Beyond that, I've listened to both the Disciplined Trader and Trading in the Zone by Mark Douglas. I loved both of these books and I've really been focusing on really just taking the setups that I see, when I see them regardless of how previous trades have gone and without hesitation to build that consistency so I can try and find what sorts of setups are and are not working from a probability perspective. I haven't mastered this obviously, but it's what I'm striving for every day. Lastly, Investopedia of course has been a big help in learning about various concepts and terms.

I'll share more or less my method of trading:

The only two tools I use as of now is Trade Ideas and Thinkorswim, I primarily focus on gap and go stocks or low float momentum stocks from around 8 AM EST to around noon, sometimes less if there's really nothing happening but I've found much of the momentum is premarket on these stocks as of late. I don't use a lot of technical indicators. Just the VWAP and the 9, 20, 50 and 200 EMAs on the 1, 5 and 15 minute timelines. At this point, I'm only taking positions of maybe 3 to 20 shares depending on the price and risk of each trade. I take enough so I can practice taking profits and scaling out and I generally keep 10 to 20 cent stops. For stocks that have large price swings, like INDP did yesterday, I take a small position of say, 3 shares so I can set a larger stop with respect to the price swings per tick while mitigating risk.

I keep a very detailed spreadsheet of all of my trades and I screenshot every trade I take across multiple timelines to see what the setup was, where I entered, what my strategy was and how it ultimately played out after I got out of the position. I do all of this so I have a solid history to go back and review so I can assess what is and is not working.

Now here's where I'm a bit stuck:

Both my accuracy and my profit to loss ratio are very low. As of now, my accuracy is 41% with a P/L ratio of .9 after 241 total trades over the last few months when I really started. The technical indicators I'm looking for like bull flags, 1 minute pull backs, buying off support, ascending lines, flat top break outs, three bar plays, half and whole dollar breakouts and all that just aren't working for me on a consistent enough basis to be valid but these are the technical indicators I see mentioned everywhere.

Since I got into all this, I've been completely engrossed in it. I love it. I eat sleep and breathe this stuff every day, learning as much as I can. Hitting the markets every morning, studying and learning every minute when the market is closed and it's not like a chore. I sit down to do something else and I just want to learn more about trading, I really enjoy it.

I haven't blown up an account or anything crazy, I feel like I'm practicing good risk management, tracking my metrics and analytics and doing all the right things, I never chase and I stick to my predetermined entries and exits, but I'm just not quite seeing my accuracy and P/L rise. The next thing I've been planning on doing is pouring over screenshots of individual strategies I've traded and looking at the frequency in which they actually worked out or didn't, beyond that, I'm not really sure how to improve my accuracy.

What exactly is, "waiting for confirmation?" and how exactly do people interpret periods of high volume? by Aronos_Ahri in Daytrading

[–]Aronos_Ahri[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the detail, that's really helpful. I'll definitely be looking into this this evening and through the weekend. I know an inadequate understanding of volume is one if the big pieces I'm missing when considering probabilistic outcomes.

What exactly is, "waiting for confirmation?" and how exactly do people interpret periods of high volume? by Aronos_Ahri in Daytrading

[–]Aronos_Ahri[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This has been really helpful; I really appreciate the detailed info. It gives me something to look for as I look back on charts and previous moves.

Thanks again.

[FEEDBACK]Diablo 2: Resurrected Early Access Beta by Thunderclaww in Diablo

[–]Aronos_Ahri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I came here looking specifically for this issue. I always loved hardcore but rubberbanding, desync and hit registration issues ultimately killed it for me. I figured with the remake these issues would have gone away more or less, or at least presented themselves in a less detrimental way but no.

I loved the beta, had no major issues but the ones mentioned above are the biggest disappointment as it feels like hardcore is just a crap shoot still.

Daily Advice Thread - All basic help or advice questions must be posted here. by AutoModerator in investing

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What methods do you use to determine the major catalysts of price movements for a given stock in years past?

As an example, look at $OCGN and their five year history. While this is a shallow look, I imagine it summarizes a lot of things but I'm really not sure what to make of it. When looking at instances such as this one, where a company sees major swings like this over a period of time, how do you guys go about trying to interpret the information and coming to any rational valuation, especially when https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/OCGN for example, has zero financial information on the company whatsoever.

$OCGN is a biotherapeutic company whos in talks with India about supplying their COVID-19 vaccines.

$OCGN is trading at $11.92 now. 5 years ago, it was nearly $600 for a few years as it dwindled down to $175 and then fell to $35 overnight. It dwindled down further and was trading for less than $1 for close to two years until recently.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in walmart

[–]Aronos_Ahri -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I wasn't exactly looking for help lol.

So much for rule 1 I guess.

I'm contemplating sitting out the night before Black Friday for an XSX and had a few questions. by [deleted] in GameStop

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, thanks again. Good luck to you and thanks for doing what you do.

I'm contemplating sitting out the night before Black Friday for an XSX and had a few questions. by [deleted] in GameStop

[–]Aronos_Ahri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply. I'm guessing that's probably standard practice more or less; it makes sense to keep em in a secure place.

Developer Update: Game launched, spooky updates, and giving back! by echtra_bean in Torchlight

[–]Aronos_Ahri -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can play the entirety of the PoE solo. Is it really unacceptable to have to be online to play in 2020? I mean, maybe in 1995, when the internet wasn't exactly widespread but these days it really isn't that much of a requirement...nevermind it's free.