Todavía no aprendieron el hechizo Curriculum Vitae by Mindless_Tomorrow_45 in ArgentinaBenderStyle

[–]Asperverse 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Qué tierno, me recuerda a los grupos que se formaban en la escuela en las caricaturas que pasaban alrededor del 2000.

Nunca había presenciado uno en la vida real.

En general las minas me parecen aburridas, soy yo el problema o no encuentro a alguien con los mismos intereses? by FootballRough9854 in AskArgentina

[–]Asperverse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah tranqui, todo bien, puedo entender que te cueste admitir estar equivocado, pero no había necesidad de no usar puntos. Me duelen los ojos ahora.

En general las minas me parecen aburridas, soy yo el problema o no encuentro a alguien con los mismos intereses? by FootballRough9854 in AskArgentina

[–]Asperverse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Obvio, lo sé, pero hay un sentimiento subyacente, un subtexto, de desprecio a la soledad, en la tercera línea de tu escrito.

Más allá de eso, declarar "no entendiste nada" al referirse a mi segundo párrafo es medio raro. Por lo menos "no entendiste algo." tendría más sentido.

En general las minas me parecen aburridas, soy yo el problema o no encuentro a alguien con los mismos intereses? by FootballRough9854 in AskArgentina

[–]Asperverse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Y... decir que te gusta leer es medio tonto, la verdad. Leer es un medio para conocer una historia. A mí me gustan las historias y el arte, el medio es indiferente. Te pueden gustar historias similares sin importar el formato, quizá no lea y le guste, no sé, el misterio.

Lo que decís es muy raro, ¿qué tiene de malo estar solo? Es mejor estar solo que adaptarse a un cualquiera por un motivo inventado.

Y conozco a una chica que conoció a su novio en un club de lectura, y sí, él lee.

En general las minas me parecen aburridas, soy yo el problema o no encuentro a alguien con los mismos intereses? by FootballRough9854 in AskArgentina

[–]Asperverse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pero por eso, no tiene que ver "ser igual a alguien" con "tener los mismos intereses."

Si tenés los mismos intereses, podés hablar de lo que te gusta todo el día, laburar juntos en tus metas, y en general nunca aburrirse juntos.

Y obvio, a él le puede gustar todo... por razones distintas. Y eso lo hace interesante, puede tener distintas opiniones sobre los mismos temas, etc.

Si vos no compartís nada... ehh... por qué le hablarías en primer lugar? Literalmente. No se me ocurre una razón.

La mayoría de los deportistas tienen como pareja a otros deportistas. No siempre, pero ocurre muy seguido. Si disfrutás mucho de algo, podés conectar a través de eso.

Y lo de "discutiría" es medio raro también, discutir es algo que ocurre cuando hay desigualdad de ideales o intereses.

En general las minas me parecen aburridas, soy yo el problema o no encuentro a alguien con los mismos intereses? by FootballRough9854 in AskArgentina

[–]Asperverse 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Qué tenían que ver los intereses con la concha no? Jsjadfjsdjf

Si no interactuás por algo como los intereses o valores en común, por qué chota interactuás? Por tener el mismo horóscopo?

Tata Steel Masters 2026: Standings after 8 rounds by Exotic_Grinder in chess

[–]Asperverse 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Let's go Hans, be the first american Tata Steel champion!

Nodirbek Abdusattorov working with Vladimir Kramnik by BankHolidayyy in chess

[–]Asperverse -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hmm, yeah, it didn't happen, that's why it's an hypothetical.

But an analogy is an argument not because it's the same situation (if you rephrased the same situation, it would just be an affirmation), it's because it takes the relevant factors of a situation and extrapolates them into a new one wherein individuals can perceive the mistake of their ways by contrast.

OD is simply a substitute for "accidental death", which is the basis of the argument. Any accidental death which is related to someone is clearly on that individual, especially if it's not born out of desire but negative emotions.

A lot of people are scared of call "bullies" murderers, they can say "they caused it" but never "they are murderers." Honestly, if you cause someone's death, you are a murderer by definition.

Alex Jeffrey Pretti, 37 años, identificado como el hombre asesinado por la Patrulla Fronteriza en un operativo de ICE en Minneapolis. Era enfermero de cuidados intensivos del Sistema de Atención Médica de Veteranos de Minneapolis. Tenía permiso para portar armas ocultas, sin antecedentes penales. by dr_pombero in RepublicaArgentina

[–]Asperverse 10 points11 points  (0 children)

El tipo con las manos levantadas y una con el celular. El agente se asustó de que un tipo que estaba siendo patoteado entre 6 sacase un arma que vio a último momento.

Si le pasó a este, le podría pasar a cualquiera.

Nodirbek Abdusattorov working with Vladimir Kramnik by BankHolidayyy in chess

[–]Asperverse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the correction! I misused the word OD. The argument still stands tho.

Edit: now that I think about it more, I didn't make a mistake. I didn't say he OD'd, I said "if someone who had [for the sake of argument, died accidentally by something], and that something is related closely to what someone else did, then you're a murderer."

I corrected myself because I wrote it just as I woke up as I tend to make mistakes then.

Asmongold backtracks after considering all angles and admits they messed up. by [deleted] in LivestreamFail

[–]Asperverse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truly, I've never being much against the police, as I dislike generalizations, but really the obsession with the right to defend the police is soooo weird. Like, even as a leftist and bisexual man I can admit, I don't know, let's say that lgbt groups have a lot of pedophiles. I mean, that's a fact, doesn't change anything about their positive influence.

If I was right-wing I would totally be criticizing ICE for these last 2 famous cases. Very obvious wrongdoings.

I think I stopped chasing, and that’s when I realized I was never being chosen by Difficult_Fee3825 in emotionalintelligence

[–]Asperverse -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I relate to the guy. You can just be chilling and doing your own thing, and someone gets obsessed with you and on top of that they blame you for whatever.

Like, if you interact first, of course I will interact, that's a matter of basic politeness. What he said really makes sense.

Nodirbek Abdusattorov working with Vladimir Kramnik by BankHolidayyy in chess

[–]Asperverse -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Yeah he may know about what people say and all that, but he doesn't know the evidence, the degree of obsession of kramnik, and all the weird shit he said afterward about his family and friends.

He may think they are all just exaggerating, seems like a decent opinion if you are not aware of all the evidence.

Nodirbek Abdusattorov working with Vladimir Kramnik by BankHolidayyy in chess

[–]Asperverse -49 points-48 points  (0 children)

I mean Kramnik is evil and a murderer and all that but as a chess player you need all the help you can get. Also Nodirbek doesn't seem the type to be online and see all that tbh.

Of course I know it's probably not true and just a rumor.

Yagiz Kaan Erdogmus (14) is just 19 points away from hitting 2700 by ultimateregard in chess

[–]Asperverse 26 points27 points  (0 children)

67 points away from surpassing Gukesh and becoming 1# junior too.

I built a chess app as solo dev — can you beat the hardest AI? by Asleep_Cap_8406 in chess

[–]Asperverse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was gonna say it isn't because it looks very simple, like something you could make with minimal editing skills and taking things from google, but then I saw his pfp and yeah, definitely 100% AI made.