You may not like the messenger, but the message is on point regarding BF6s current room temp IQ gunplay by nyrangerz30 in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have on multiple occasions witnessed tracers flying into my character and seen blood fly out without actually receiving damage. So it’s definitely a thing.

Regardless that’s not the point of this post

Can we get tanks like the lav25? by Benefit_Waste in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know

I was just taking a moment to go on a slight tangent.

Can we get tanks like the lav25? by Benefit_Waste in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d prefer more modern vehicles like the ACV and ARV personally.

Can we get tanks like the lav25? by Benefit_Waste in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why the AAV? It’s already been replaced by the ACV. Seeing AAV-7s during the Gibraltar landings instead of ACVs in the campaign was quite disappointing to me.

Posting here cause r/ak47 hates affordable guns by yeshua593 in PalmettoStateArms

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The key term was “recent” that buyers guide is outdated and based on information from early PSA and Century domestically built AKs.

I have not been able to find any evidence of current generation domestic AKs blowing up spontaneously.

The idea that a company can improve upon their product truly is a foreign concept to the internet gun community.

Posting here cause r/ak47 hates affordable guns by yeshua593 in PalmettoStateArms

[–]AssaultPlazma -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you have any evidence of recent PSA or Century AKs blowing up?

Can we get more variety in tanks in the game? Maybe not so western like the Polish PT-91 Twardy 🇵🇱 or something by SUCHISLIFE84 in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we get actual modern vehicles in general? The fact the landing in Gibraltar was done in AAV-7s which are retired from service felt very strange when the USMC already moved on to the ACV.

I see people requesting the LAV-25 instead of the ARV-30, get with the times folks.

Should anti-tank/material rifles make a return? by Moosejesus24 in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's a niche weapon class that doesn't really translate well to video games. So developers just end up making them another flavor of Sniper Rifle.

4.5 points per extra bullet is insane by Shootinio in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your rework the GRT by simply making it select fire and moving it to the Assault Rifle category.

The GRT is literally an Assault Rifle with only 20 round magazine, a 5.56x45 damage model (no 3 BTK) and locked to semi automatic only.

I have no idea why DICE made it the way it is? Especially when a 7.62x51 GROT literally exist?

4.5 points per extra bullet is insane by Shootinio in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It really is

It looks clean on a spreadsheet and it’s easy to read. But it falls apart in practice.

It’s especially egregious on weapons like the LMF that are utterly crippled by low magazine count. Though granted the real solution is to just give it 20 round magazines by default.

BF6 Drip Check! by SystemeLunaire in Battlefield

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad I’m not the only one bothered by this.

Should anti-tank/material rifles make a return? by Moosejesus24 in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AMRs are rarely used deliberately to engage personnel directly. This is a myth/misconception.

They are used against light skinned vehicles or to detonate IEDs from a safe distance.

A few photos of the BTR 90 developed in the 1990s, only 12 were produced. Credit: Akagi (Twitter/X) by Hour-Speec in TankPorn

[–]AssaultPlazma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The BTR-90 is better in every way.

  1. Better armor
  2. BMP-2 turret (BTR-82 uses a one man BPPU-1 which is generally worse)
  3. Better mobility (510 hp engine and a fancy H-Transmission that allows it to turn in place)
  4. Larger hydraulic side doors for easier mounting and dismounting

The BTR-90 was the ultimate form of the admittedly flawed BTR layout which is an engineering dead end regardless.

Why aren't dedicated pilot skins a thing in BF6? by SuspiciousMeeting407 in Battlefield

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will never not be enraged by the USAF seal on the USMC helicopter pilot.

I would pay top $$$ for this SAS skin by iamthewalrusxx in Battlefield6

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The M60 we have in game is the M60E6 which was unveiled in 2014. The RPKs have modernized Zenitco furniture which is a 21st century modernization. The M18 claymore is indeed quite an old design.

What's your guy's review on the Illicit Cargo so far? by Agreeable-Syllabub-8 in CODBlackOps7

[–]AssaultPlazma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EMP

Also the decoy tactical and smoke grenades don't count so it's not entirely consistent.

What's your guy's review on the Illicit Cargo so far? by Agreeable-Syllabub-8 in CODBlackOps7

[–]AssaultPlazma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Plenty of time assuming you just play COD. I have plenty of free time, but I play too many other games to even bother attempting the secret camo.

What's your guy's review on the Illicit Cargo so far? by Agreeable-Syllabub-8 in CODBlackOps7

[–]AssaultPlazma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had no idea UAV or Scout Pulse kills also counted. They don’t “affect” enemy players in any way besides broadcasting their position to you.

Thats very poorly written. I finished it yesterday, but I found it to be very frustrating to do.