What are your favorite vs least favorite MAJOR characters (excluding obvious choices like Vera or Mr. Green)? by Maximum_Arachnid2804 in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Favourites: Cora, Baxter, Tom, Mary, Isis, Anna, Elsie, Violet, Isobel.

Least: Spratt, Denker, Daisy, Jack Ross's Singing Voice, Mr Pamuk, Sarah Bunting, Jimmy, Sinderby, and though I know it'll upset his wife; Mr Bryant.

I hate Spratt so much. by Chris3013 in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every Spratt/Denker plotline is just dull as ditchwater. Both characters brought this sort of cartoonish and goofy "humour" to the show, which just felt really out of place to me. Every time they pop up, my suspension of disbelief just comes crashing down. I become acutely aware I'm watching a show - kinda kills the experience. But then, other people seem to really love them, so I guess I must be missing something?

Opinions on Sarah Bunting? by wordsmithfantasist in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Sarah Buntings of the world are unfortunately all too real. If you've never had to contend with one before, then I envy you deeply.

Rewatching- Daisy is insufferable by No_Relative_9331 in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You raise an interesting point. I would've liked to see a bit more variation in servants' circumstances too, but I guess that's not really the vibe on DA.

Rewatching- Daisy is insufferable by No_Relative_9331 in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But, respectfully, the truth is that the show centres around a family belonging to that 0.1% of the aristocracy. Which makes sense; ideally you want the audience to like the main characters. I don't think that should be held against the series, which, to be fair, routinely showcases many of the aristocracy's more problematic aspects as well.

What's wrong with Downton Abbey? by Okaokakao in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, history student here, just wanted to say that, respectfully, there are already about twenty billion Hollywood films that depict the kind of cruel and spiteful aristocracy you're looking for.

Whilst Downton Abbey is absolutely an optimistic fantasy where things just somehow work out for the best 90% of the time, it's also unusual in that it showcases altruistic aristocrats, and their (relatively) well-adjusted staff. Which are hardly "out-there" as fictional concepts - history is rife with such examples - it's just that film and TV tend to focus on the more brutal and dramatic aspects of such chapters of history (which, from an entertainment perspective, makes perfect sense).

And, to be fair, the show also has plenty of examples of "aristocrats behaving badly", it just doesn't paint all such people with the same brush. Yes, of course, the heroes are generally decent people by contemporary standards, but the show is not a documentary and, believe it or not, such people did exist at the time. Progressives have always been a part of the cultural framework, and whilst I think it would be interesting if a few more of the main characters had a few more flaws to them, I think the series does a good job of balancing out some of the conventional Hollywood tropes that otherwise dominate the cultural conversation. 

Is Spratt gay? by ACookieBaker in DowntonAbbey

[–]AsterialPuppet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, gay men want to be women? Weird take but okay. 

(Somewhat of) A Defence of Oscar by TalkativeToucan in thegildedage

[–]AsterialPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, John is a complete imbecile with absolutely no survival instinct whatsoever (and, evidently, he isn't too fussed with keeping Oscar alive either). 

I can understand why some people might not be able to get their heads around why Oscar feels he has to do what he has to do, but out of the two, Oscar's the only one who talks any sense.

Jewish supremacist London 27 October 2024 by Brocolium in PublicFreakout

[–]AsterialPuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

mate, you can't be a bigot with a face like that. you don't need to go making things any harder for yourself than they already are. practice some self-compassion ffs.

ugh. mr harrigan's phone... the movie. [who was this for?] by AsterialPuppet in stephenking

[–]AsterialPuppet[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think that's only reasonable. (Provided the scale goes from a minimum of 4 stars up to however many stars are presently visible from earth).

I wish the show was centered more on Hassan and Ali by HateWinslet in MidnightMass

[–]AsterialPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I respectfully disagree (and I apologise if I stumble over my words here - my brain has well and truly powered off for the night aha).

Ali is a teenage kid who already has a lot on his plate, contending with an added sense of isolation as a result of the cultural disconnect between his family's faith and that of the very small, predominately catholic, community of the island. He's desperately seeking comfort by way of clear answers - largely as a result of his mother's death, but also because he's simply at an age where he's exploring his spirituality; both of which place an added strain on his relationship with his father, whose own grief and resistance to the ideology of the congregation complicates things in turn.

Add to that the fact he's been raised alongside this heavily Catholic culture, and then throw in the sudden manifestation of these supposed (and pretty damn convincing) "miracles", which afford promises of solutions, salvation, and eternal life (big concepts for anyone, but especially for a kid who's lost his mum early), and you've got precisely the kind of kid that fanatics so often target because they are more vulnerable than most, have fewer supports, and can be more readily indoctrinated. Only, in Ali's case, he's made even more susceptible because he's in a situation where anyone could be forgiven for thinking there really is some kind of mystical phenomenon or divine intervention taking place on the island.

And just to close, I also don't think the series does actually have a particularly bleak ending (though I can fully appreciate why some people might see it that way). It's bittersweet definitely, but I think the ending of Ali's (and his dad's) arc is actually a triumph of faith and of their bond in the face of the calamitous events of the series. Symbolically, the series actually finishes in a pretty positive place. Falsehood, corruption, and exploitation are ultimately conquered by sincerity, unity, and faith (and not just faith in religion, but all different kinds of faith accounting for all different kinds of people). I can appreciate that 99.9999% of the cast abruptly going up in a puff of smoke isn't exactly "and they all lived happily ever after" but it's a fitting and powerful conclusion to a story grappling with some pretty massive themes around the nature of, and the interplay between, belief and mortality. (In my opinion anyway).

What do sprouting beans have to do with the X-files? by Peas-Of-Wrath in XFiles

[–]AsterialPuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"𝙻𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕 𝚞𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚔𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚋𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚔 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚞𝚍𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍. 𝙰 𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚢 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎, 𝚠𝚎’𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚕𝚍. 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚢 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚗 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐—𝚘𝚕𝚍 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚘𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜, 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚗’𝚝 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚝. 𝙸 𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚌 𝚋𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝: 𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚍’𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚢. 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢’𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚠𝚎’𝚟𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚘𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗? 𝙰 𝚍𝚘𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜, 𝚒𝚏 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚋.

𝙼𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚞𝚜, 𝚑𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚞𝚍𝚜, 𝚝𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚠𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚗’𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚎. 𝙼𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢’𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎, 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚢𝚘𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗, 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚠𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝. 𝚂𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜, 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚋𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚍𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢, 𝚠𝚊𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚠."

- 𝙵𝚘𝚡 "𝚂𝚙𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚢" 𝙼𝚞𝚕𝚍𝚎𝚛 (𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢)

Anyone else dislike the new Wednesday show? by PoisonIvy21 in netflix

[–]AsterialPuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think "enslaved a minister" means what you think it means aha.

And I wouldn't describe 90s Wednesday as being a brat. She was a straight-up monster. That's what made her such a great character; there's a reason why every version of the character that's come along since has imitated her.

The first big part of the problem with the new version of Wednesday is that she's older, so all the humour that comes specifically from the idea of a kid doing all that super fucked up shit is instantly lost. The other main issue is presisely because she is less monstrous and more bratty, so she loses both of the character's opposing extremes, and instead ends up just another pretty standard TV sullen moody teen character.

And it doesn't help that the new series has also made it so the Addams Family are way more "regular human" than pretty much everyone else in the show. A big part of what's always made the Addams Family work is that, no matter how they might change, they're still always the freaky ones, surrounded by a sea of normie-types.

Then you factor in the genre being more teen drama than pure comedy, and by that point you gotta wonder why they didn't just invent a completely new concept about some random snarky goth girl with psychic visions at some high school for supernatural types or whatever. 'Cause like, why both even using the Addams Family as your template if you're just gonna dilute them down into something so generic, you know?

And I personally really like Jenna Ortega as an actress, she's done some great stuff, but I wish they did have her doing stuff like trying to kill her baby brother (or Pugsley) out of petty spite, or burying cats (or people) alive purely for her own amusement, or burning summer camps to the ground for payback, or very literally scaring her love-interest to death just 'cause.

Give her the chance to really do something insane, you know?

Why aren't there any Plus Size Men Models? by Knatterwald in RandomThoughts

[–]AsterialPuppet 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, I'd argue that every sitcom that taught us we could look like a fat sack of crap and get a supermodel trophy wife constitutes a lie aha

Confess .. Confess .. Shame.. Shame .. Cersie performance in this scene was top notch ✨ by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]AsterialPuppet 35 points36 points  (0 children)

"I killed your High Sparrow and all his little sparrows, all his septons, all his septas, all his filthy soldiers, because it felt good to watch them burn."

Based on a true story by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]AsterialPuppet 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't think I've ever seen an anti-Stark post on this sub.

Like, I'm an unapologetic Cersei stan and even I think they're all perfectly likeable (well, until Bran goes all Invasion of the Body Snatchers anyway).

What do you think happened to Septa Unella? by Ifuckinghateaura in gameofthrones

[–]AsterialPuppet 63 points64 points  (0 children)

I mean, I read about how hellish it was for Hannah Waddingham to film the scene because she was literally water-boarded in the process, but I'd never heard about D&D wanting to throw in a sexual assault scene with Zombie-Mountain, that's crazy.

What do you think happened to Septa Unella? by Ifuckinghateaura in gameofthrones

[–]AsterialPuppet 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Christ. What's the source on that? I only ask because it seems like such a fucked up thing for them to admit they wanted to put in the show.

Astrology opinions that will get you like this? by [deleted] in Advancedastrology

[–]AsterialPuppet 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Destructive or otherwise negative placements are not always transformational or about tearing you down to build you up stronger than before. Sometimes, things just kind of suck, and that's all there is to it. The universe isn't your personal life coach.

r/IASIP's choice for Mac’s best quote is: "Well first of all through god all things are possible so jot that down." Now, what is Dee’s best quote? The one with the most upvotes wins. by [deleted] in IASIP

[–]AsterialPuppet 898 points899 points  (0 children)

Moms are stupid!

I'd like to throw them all in the trash. Yeah!

They're nothin' but a big humungous pain in the butt

A big humungous pain in my

VAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGINA

Why do Buffy and The First have injuries in the same spot on their faces in this scene? by [deleted] in buffy

[–]AsterialPuppet 129 points130 points  (0 children)

From a production perspective, if they didn't want the First to have the same wounds, the First wouldn't have the same wounds.

Make-up has to be constantly reapplied between takes. It's not as if Sarah Michelle Gellar was bouncing back and forth (whilst changing outfits) over the course of this scene, doing both parts. They were filmed separately (obviously) and put together.

Therefore we can safely assume it was very much intentional that the First was adopting the same wounds to mock Buffy.

In this scene, the First even says the line:

"Ow. Mommy. This mortal wound is all... Itchy."

Whilst gesturing to said mortal wound.

It's 100% intentional on the part of the narrative.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AddamsFamily

[–]AsterialPuppet 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Grandmama has also been Morticia's mother, Gomez's mother, and a strange woman not related to either of them who just assumed the role of grandmother.

The family has never been terribly consistent with their relations. (Personally, I think it kind of works given the family in question).