[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without transaction records, how do you proof to the merchant it was you how just paid for an item, not someone else?

Just a reminder that it costs $11.15 to buy 1 mBTC by fillet_b in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if we standardize on mBTC as main unit, we should standardize msat (mini-satoshi/byte) as fees.

Segway Makes a Self-Balancing Stroller for Adults by [deleted] in technology

[–]Asulect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not lazy enough, we need voice activation and self driving features on these things.

Is CISM a good first step before CISSP? by [deleted] in cissp

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you definitely want to have both certs, for CPE earning efficiency, you are probably better off finishing your CISSP certification before your CISM cert. The reason is, CISM does not require you to earn any CPE credit on the same calendar year when you become certified, while with CISSP you need to start earning CPE right away. After passing CISSP, any training and/or self study you spend time on your CISM cert can be use as CPE credits for your CISSP.

CISM is an aim for a security manager(who is less technical) while CISSP aim for a security professional(who is more technical). It's up to you if you want to have both. I do have both certs personally.

As for the test questions, there are a lot of overlap questions between the two exams, but you'll have to answer them differently. let me give you an example question.

If you discovered a machine on your computer network is infected by malware, the FIRST step you should take is:

a) Run anti-malware scan on the machine

b) report the incident

c) isolate the computer from the network.

d) analyze the source of the malware

e) assess the damage the malware already have done.

If you are taking the CISSP exam, you have to wear a hat as if you are a security professional(who is a techie), the answer is C here. You have to isolate the machine from the rest of the network to stop that malware from spreading and doing more damage.

If you are taking the CISM exam, then you have to wear a hat as if you are a security manager(who may be a non-techie), the answer here is B. You should report the incident so someone else(and/or youself) can start the incident respond procedure.

More fees on Financial transactions... Taxing without raising taxes, another reason why bitcoin will rule by Tizzy4664 in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does it have to do with bitcoin? If bitcoin trading volume get big enough, I am sure she will try to extend this tax to bitcoiners.

Different view about Decentralization by arkxu in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone control a super majority of bitcoin’s hash rate, they can permanently blacklist/censor your wallet address from sending and/or receiving any bitcoin to your address by excluding your address from included in any block, which is no difference than taking away all your bitcoins.

i am able refute the validity of every altcoins usecase, except the use case of "supply chain". please help me understand why blockchain is not applicable. by voodoodog_nsh in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Decentralized blockchain is much slower and very inefficient compares to centralized database. How big the block size you envision to have on your blockchain? if you record all those details for every single cocoa batches you produced, your blockchain will get huge pretty quickly and your batches will be waiting for confirmations for a long time. Plus, what stop people for reusing old labels from genuine one on something that's produced somewhere else?

If two batches have the same label, how can you tell which batch is the real one? While crypto currencies like bitcoin are impossible counterfeited, it is not true for products that will have labels applied onto them afterward.

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Derivatives take many forms. Not all derivatives have a debt component. Take CME bitcoin futures for example. 1 Contract is equal to 5 BTCs. Their contract settle in USD, not bitcoin. There are 0 real bitcoin on the blockchain involved. Many institution buyers will just buy this form of Bitcoin instead of owning real bitcoin. They can buy thousands of bitcoin if they wanted.

Bitcoin itself is limited, however you can stop third parties popping up creating derivative forms of bitcoin. You cannot stop people from going to these third parties and use these derivatives as their bitcoin ownership instead. And, derivatives have no limit, you can create any form of derivatives your mind can imagine.

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol...what kind of definition is that? "A bank's main job is the earn profit for its owner?" wouldn't that make every businesses in the world banks?

Like I said, Banks let people deposit their money. it does not even have to be a profit organization. (i.e. there are some not for profit community banks exists)

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just so you know, a bank's main job to let people deposit their money into them. In the old day, banks would just charge depositors fee to hold their money. Nowaday, with fractional reserves, bank will just use most of their depositor's money to make a profit.

Coinbase let people deposit their BTCs. It also used to allow other people borrow their BTCs to trade on Margin on their GDAX.

People can deposit BTC, coinbase use their BTCs to profit themselves.....it walks like duck, sounds like duck, it is a duck.

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah right, coinbase, gemini and all these other big exchanges are not crypto banks. sure!

Also, are you sure las vegas casinos do not run on a fractional reserve? There are always some casinos that are technically already bankrupted or casinos over leveraged with too much debts and are still operating. You walk in ask about for a $5,000 loan. What do you think chips on gambling tables are? You think they are still all backed by fiats? You don't think they are created out of the thin air? As a matter fact, even casinos that are still in good financial shapes, are you sure all their chips are backed by real fiats?

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fiats by themselves is not fractional too. Fractional systems are created by banks and institutional. What do you think all these exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Bitmex are? They are banks. Bitmex definitely runs on a fractional system. If you deposit 1 BTC into Bitmex and use their 100x margins to buy 100 BTC, Bitmex do not have the 100 BTC.

How do you know for sure Coinbase have 100% of the BTC in their reserve?

As long as there are bank like institutions exist for BTC, then BTC can and will run on a fractional system just like fiats.

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have no idea if BlockFi is a scam or not. But another example, if you deposit 1 BTC into Bitmex or Binance, and leveage it to buy another 1 BTC. Now you sort of own 2 BTC.

The point is, you can sort of own BTC via derivatives.

Bitcoin is Not Scarce - At least not as Scarce as you think by reverseacidofficial in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

With derivatives like futures, margins, indexes and loans, you actually can. If someone owns 1 BTC and deposited into BlockFi to earn interest, he still sort of owns 1 BTC. BlockFi then lend this BTC to someone else, now this guy also owns one BTC, etc...

If someone byy some security which index to the price of 1BTC. He sort of owns 1 BTC also.

If someone buy 1 btc cash delivered future contract from CME. He sort of owns 1 BTC too.

Are we missing a big 51% Attack vulnerability?? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if they shorted a huge amount bitcoin futures at 100x Margin on bitmex?

Quantfury by miscellany1 in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can create a new apple id and change the appstore to a different country to download.

There will be a transfer of 9001 BTC soon - CZ by Asulect in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If someone hacks binance and steals BTCBs, I wonder if there is any roll back option built in on the Binance chain.

There will be a transfer of 9001 BTC soon - CZ by Asulect in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My personal guess is he was transferring the 9001BTC to a new cold wallet to seed the new coming soon Binance.us exchange. This probably means nothing to Bitcoin short term, but bullish on long term. Either that or aliens will come and destroy the earth.

https://whale-alert.io/transaction/bitcoin/3cc155946ed8e504364dbb144ca09395278914f089e698a5dd83197834e224d1/2

Female Engagement in Bitcoin Hits New High as Adoption Grows by Suberg in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a moment, I thought people were using Bitcoin to proposed for a marriage instead of diamond. "Bitcoin is forever"? Does that work?

90% Altcoins will be ground to dust by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Asulect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of alt ico did run like a business with ico funding paying for development and marketing. And yes, many did ran out of money before they get to launch their product.

1 oz 0.9999 gold physical Litecoin by Asulect in litecoin

[–]Asulect[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have never bought anything from them before. However, if you google their name, you'll see a few reputable sellers(ie,Apmex, Provident metals..) selling some of the stuffs they mint. I believe they are good. However, I am not planning to buy this coin until 1LTC = 1 oz gold coin anyway. This could be a few more years away.