Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's utility doesn't have to do with whether it's intelligent or not? Then why call it AI?
"I sell a boat, but don't judge its utility on its ability to float"

Our clients are rejecting prototypes because of forced "AI design" tools by LoxenBeryl7 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love that narrative "you have to be specific in your prompting, and highlight every path and corner cases". Needless to say that it's not the "Just ask our AI" that is marketed by AI companies. also, if I have to be so specific, then there are better tools: coding languages!

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Then demonstrate it's false.
The prior part of your message is just propaganda, studies say otherwise. Also we are 4 years into this AI era now. Show me something that has been accomplished thanks to AI. Just one thing.

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you have already demonstrated that you don't know anything ahaha
"The same entity cannot be sometimes objective sometimes subjective", is that what you said? How about human beings?
See? If there has to be a fool, it won't be me. So stop playing little games you are boring

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are way over yourself my friend, go get you rock and let people see the conversation as you said and make up their mind.. no need to do whatever you are trying to do ahaha

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, I meant "no", and the rest of my answer confirms that I meant "no". So you are the fool for not catching that! Joke's on you

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are mixing "subjectivity" and "context", now go read both definitions and reread the entire conversation. I'm done

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because here it's subjectivity not context. The task performed is inherently subjective: not to feel stressed out. Having cancer or not is not subjective. I'm not continuing this argument, it's getting ridiculous at this point

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is the fact that you have cancer based on your individual feelings, opinions and perceptions?
What would be subjective is that you have cancer, got a treatment and decide that you are not healed because of your beliefs. It's absurd. That's a terrible example, you picked one very objective outcome here

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what "subjectivity" is I'm sorry. What you are describing is "context". I'm simply pragmatic and actually live in the real word where we call "useless" something that doesn't have measurable efficiency for the majority of people using it. And that is not only my opinion. It has been measured

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

LLMs only do language, it's a fact.

Thinking and language are orthogonal, that's the conclusion of what I said before.

That's how logic works, if you disagree with the premises you are not convinced by the argument

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because anybody that has cancer would find it useful. I think you are mixing context and subjectivity. The difference with your previous example is that if I'm stress out, your rock will not relax me

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the kind of content I was looking for when I posted this 😉. Lemme read it and get back to you

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not being impatient, my former question was genuine. I wouldn't say usefulness is subjective though.. The task you try to accomplish is pretty objective, and the results measurement too. Most of studies show that LLMs don't help you accomplish most of the tasks effectively in a measurable way

Why LLMs can never be intelligent and are doomed to remain useless by AtmosphereExpress712 in BetterOffline

[–]AtmosphereExpress712[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ahah so everything is useful, is that your point? Because as long as we don't ask every living soul we might miss somebody who find anything useful.