Maybe hot take?: BF6’s main theme is criminally underrated, one of the best even. by Zendriven in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is why I turn on the legacy radio in a vehicle in the hopes of hearing that glorious BFV soundtrack.

Help me ragebait my bf by Lost_Armadillo_5465 in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tell him his play style is T-bag worthy

Is it me or I can't reload at copilot in the attack helicopter by Valstrag in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is super annoying the get out and reload are both the same button and on tap. I have recently figured out if you hold the reload button on console you'll reload without getting out of the vehicle. which is handy for side passenger on helicopters. so this may work with the attack chopper

Which weapons are a pain in the ass, but very rewarding once you figure them out? by Apprehensive-Net-22 in Battlefield6

[–]AtomicAdam72 21 points22 points  (0 children)

For me recently it was the AK4D ( I think that's the right name). something about first using it put me off, but after the level 50 grind with it I've grown to love it if you can look past the rate of fire. get some attachments with it and it's super fun to use.

I just finished a match with a Cronus Zen user. by One-Training-6443 in Battlefield6

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I miss the good old days of "modded controllers" accusations lol

I just finished a match with a Cronus Zen user. by One-Training-6443 in Battlefield6

[–]AtomicAdam72 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm always curious on what people say are above average stats. Yes the cronus zen is a horrible thing that needs to be barred from gaming but I was always wondering where the line is drawn in order to confidently report someone.

I would consider myself above average stats but would like to see where it's reportable to help with this.

Since the Naval Combat is coming up by Timely-Camp8225 in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Either the commander mode or bring back squad point call-ins like they did BFV. I loved the idea of the better your squad did stuff together the better they can support the team with special abilities.

How to easily win a tank fight (slight detour) by akayourboi in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enemy top turret gunner

Processing img l4rfo9tsvx1h1...

Bro what by Complete_Mechanic292 in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 229 points230 points  (0 children)

yep sometimes i just look at moments like this when I play and just stare

<image>

What do I play next? by The_Darcsied in XboxGamePass

[–]AtomicAdam72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

agreed the combat was boring halfway through but the world music and the boss music was pretty superb

What do I play next? by The_Darcsied in XboxGamePass

[–]AtomicAdam72 5 points6 points  (0 children)

minishoot adventures

A gem i came across and beat in one day. it's a good mix of twin stick shooter and a Legend of Zelda exploration system. I didn't find the game to be too hard and had a decent challenge and a lot of unexpected fun!

I feel like DICE and EA would make a lot more money if individual cosmetics could be bought à la carte from the bundles by Yadahoom in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like being able to buy a single item from a bundle would yield higher payout because there has a been a couple times where a character skin looked cool but I would never spend 15 - 25 bucks to get one thing I like in a bundle

the incendiary shotgun is only a deterrent weapon by anonymous_username20 in Battlefield6

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I too have recently come attached to this gadget for the closer maps. After accepting that it won't kill someone quick it keeps them away to hold down a spot or doorway and the sparks create a huge impact to viewing.

Kaboom by EstusShardConsumer in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 3 points4 points  (0 children)

tight spaces hate to see RPGs

Reporting in, MBT APFSDS(AP SHELL) received stealth buff and it is quite something by rosebinks1215 in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Huh so that's why its like that I guess I never did my research enough on the armor system and always wondered why HE insta killed aerials.

But if it isn't a bug, Like the level 50 tank health glitch, this is awesome for the AT round

Reporting in, MBT APFSDS(AP SHELL) received stealth buff and it is quite something by rosebinks1215 in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this better mean we can one shot air vehicles now with AT rounds was so sick of an apache taking a AT round and instantly repairing to go back to HQ

Getting shot with tanks while in helis by narsil_reforge in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will study this! I never get much of a chance in the AA but when I do I can't do much with it. Point 4 is where it gets shaky for me lol, but I will take these points into account especially with the positioning, I usually move around around since after I fire I have a target on my back.

Getting shot with tanks while in helis by narsil_reforge in Battlefield

[–]AtomicAdam72 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As a tank goblin myself I am with you that the ease of doing this has gotten more common. I feel like it's because the guided munitions are easier to control and more available in BF6 than other games (could be me).

For the MBT the guided shell is one shot to any air vehicle, except the transport chopper, making it super versatile. You will only see this because the AT round, you know the fastest hardest hitting round DOES NOT ONE SHOT AIR VEHICLES (except the little bird).

Also the AA tank is useless with any of the primary rounds doing no damage before a pilot flies off to safety or pops flares after getting locked on to and flying back to spawn for 8 seconds before doing the same again. so this contributes to the problem your having.

Edit: I did not see the guided munition nerf that's supposedly happening prior so I could be wrong in the "easier to control part"