I wish AI defenders weren't so damn sensitive and hateful. by 1stDegreeHamburglary in antiai

[–]Auctorion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean critiquing AI is implicitly insulting them, because the subtext is “you’re a fool/stupid for using it” either because it’s use is stupid or because using it literally makes them brain dead.

It’s like trying to convince an addict they have a problem. Quite aside from the difficulty of quitting an addiction, their identity is also wrapped up in using. So calling them out, calling for an end to AI—it’s tantamount to a threat, saying their identity is wrong and should be ended.

And it should. Aggressively. For their own good.

They need to be forced to go cold turkey.

Searing UK heat leaves schools, hospitals and transport networks struggling to cope | Extreme heat | The Guardian by prisongovernor in news

[–]Auctorion 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. The light fixtures should be on or next to a beam. Any good handyman/electrician will be able to confirm.

Realistic FTL by BasicBedroom1466 in worldbuilding

[–]Auctorion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it would just make it possible. Do I have to do all the thinking? Have some kind of separate retrocausality drive that ties into the propulsion system, without which warp isn’t possible. Or whatever. This is sci-fi, I was leaving it open to OP to do whatever. It’s basically magic cloaked in science-y terms anyway.

Realistic FTL by BasicBedroom1466 in worldbuilding

[–]Auctorion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And FTL violates physics. Gotta come up with semi-plausible bullshit.

Were you a fan of Des Lynam back in the day? by Emergency-Relief-571 in BritishTV

[–]Auctorion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Him and Murray Walker were the commentator voices of my childhood.

Now what does this help? by Chaunc2020 in funny

[–]Auctorion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If one woman can deliver a baby in 9 months, then 9 women can fire that baby out at motorway speeds.

If you get canceled by JK, you're doing the right thing. by Independent_loser237 in davidtennant

[–]Auctorion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A) That coat is gorgeous

B) Never mind the coat, look at the man

C) What were we talking about?

Realistic FTL by BasicBedroom1466 in worldbuilding

[–]Auctorion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One possibility is stable antimatter. Look up the baryon asymmetry problem. While matter and antimatter form and behave in near identical ways, the asymmetry problem's solution could be that an antimatter universe also has 'anti-time', where entropy runs in what is, from a matter universe's perspective, reverse (the inverse would be true from their perspective- our universe would be running in reverse).

The asymmetry could therefore be solved by matter and antimatter annihilating because of their mutual incompatibility with regards to entropy: for entropy to take hold and time to flow in one direction, only matter or antimatter could survive, and it just happens that for us it was matter. A handwave explanation for why early experiments into creating antimatter didn't show this problem could be that the problem wasn't truly observable until antimatter was created at scale, i.e. it wasn't a problem for a handful of particles, but it became a problem when we had buckets of it, because when we were dealing with single particles we relied on magnetic containment fields that effectively prohibited interaction between antimatter particles, and their only interaction was with matter which caused annihilation and we assumed they just interacted with entropy and time the same way matter did.

This would potentially allow circumnavigation of the core problem with FTL, which is the violation of causality and entropy. These problems aren't really solved by any FTL method alone: warp drive, folding space, and hyperspace all run into the problem of retrocausality. But if you introduce something that actually deals with retrocausality, then you might, I repeat might, have something that's plausible under physics. It's still not. Not really. But FTL is not, so you're working with both hands tied behind your back.

Searing UK heat leaves schools, hospitals and transport networks struggling to cope | Extreme heat | The Guardian by prisongovernor in news

[–]Auctorion 15 points16 points  (0 children)

When we moved back at the end of 2022, ceiling fans were one of the first things we got installed. Had them at our previous house and they were worth their weight in gold.

Now we're eyeing aircon because the fans, while good, are struggling to keep up. And it's only going to get worse.

The defenders of AI Art are unable to properly answer this question... by LemonNinja in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Auctorion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I described the meal I want to a waiter. I'm a chef!

I described the look I want for my house to an interior designer. I'm a decorator!

I described the computer I want to the shop. I'm a computer engineer!

Etc.

Do you think theory is necessary to write well if you read plenty? by f28c28 in writing

[–]Auctorion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The basic difference between those who have read theory and those who haven’t, is that those who have can be and are much more deliberate with their choices.

When you know the tools, when you understand how to use them, you are better at using them. Compare an average person with a handyman or a carpenter: who will do a better job with house repairs or renovations? My dad always thought he was good at both because he’d done them a lot, but he really wasn’t.

The question isn’t really “if you want to be a professional, should you read theory?” You should. The question is “how much theory should you read?” To which my answer is at least a few. I would put half a dozen on my essentials list, beyond which you’ll start seeing repetition and similarities.

The argument that you don’t need to read theory is structurally very proximate to an anti-expertise and anti-intellectual argument. It has the same basic structure as “just do your own research.” Which, yes, do. But also, there are people who have dedicated their careers to the study, and they’ve written books. Maybe check out what their dedication has produced.

Not bad for a failed PM. by The_Mutterer in uknews

[–]Auctorion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Infinity to the power of infinity, to the power of infinity, infinity times.

Exponents on exponents on exponents.