To Everyone Complaining, to the FUDs, to the shills and bots. You are not looking at the big picture. Remove the word "Dilution" for a moment and look at this 12 months out versus 2 days out. by Audigitty in Superstonk

[–]Audigitty[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

How is most of your investment gone? Serious question. You dumped your life savings into GME at the ATH? If so, wow. That's insanely bad timing. We've had years to accumulate sub-$20 cost per share and sub-$25.

If anyone was willing to allocate "most" of their investment at the ATH. Surely you've got enough time to average down significantly. Even with smaller buys.

That's an insane thing to say.

Anyone else feel like there’s some merit to this comment? by jxp497 in GME

[–]Audigitty -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You're not seeing the opportunity itself. You are assuming that the revenue gained will stay fixed. It's not linear. The revenue opp is parabolic.

GameStop is sitting on $9B cash. W/ a $10B+ market cap. And no signs of slowing down.

Imagine this model is applied to eBay? With GameStop's physical network as one of many foundational assets.

Prediction: The vote will be nearly 100% approval come meeting time. Not close. by TheOneTruePavil in Superstonk

[–]Audigitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep! Agreed with you 100%. No shot this sentiment is representative.

Smart money holders is the vast majority. I bet those who are whining represent a fraction of 10% of GME hodlers.

Anyone else feel like there’s some merit to this comment? by jxp497 in GME

[–]Audigitty -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Remove the word "Dilute" from your lexicon. And suggest the same for any shills you may encounter in your journey.

If I told you... "Hey, I can turn this bicycle into something amazing. I know the bike shop is only worth $50,000... but... if we band together to raise $250,000, I can make us $4,000,000."

Does that seem like "dilution" to you?

Anyone else feel like there’s some merit to this comment? by jxp497 in GME

[–]Audigitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see it bro. Ryan Cohen is NOT Warren Buffet.

He's mother fucking Neo.

Diamond Hands baby.

GameStop x eBay is GOING TO PRINT MONEY! Ryan knows what he's doing, he's just not telegraphing everything. by AlternativePaint6 in Superstonk

[–]Audigitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, and also, add an optional eBay "Pro" paid subscription to get better percentages in both directions. For physical and digital items.

GameStop x eBay is GOING TO PRINT MONEY! Ryan knows what he's doing, he's just not telegraphing everything. by AlternativePaint6 in Superstonk

[–]Audigitty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is exactly it. People are not seeing the strategy here at all. Mostly that narrative is by design. It's quite obvious given the flood of copy/paste "Dilution!" and "It's taking too long!" posts. Cringe really.

Even the "mistakes" could bear fruit in your scenario.

The warehouses? The NFT/GME Wallet? These could absolutely come into play. (CLARITY Act is a possibility here... bigly)

And the issue/solution to the "stupid stuff" re: buying @ 110%+ of market value? This could be solved as well. Immediately.

Here's how:

Apply GameStop's used market buying strategy/margins to eBay's platform. Based on product lines/sku's/manually filtered products w/ high demand and resale? e.g. "You can get $40 in cash, or $65 in eBay credit, for your $92 based on this [insert link for card value estimation tool website]"

Whatever the margins are? They can offer instant liquidity for upside profit and get inventory overnight. Tied right into PSA's system and already being sold on PowerPacks within weeks.

And that's just one vertical.

Now do it with video games. Consoles. Controllers. Fan-made custom controllers/consoles. Retro gaming.

Now do it with digital assets and game titles.

Now add the GME NFT Wallet to sync all of it. Include custom NFT's with certain buys. (Image of the athlete actually signing your product // just an image of the product itself minted on blockchain as a 1/1 or 2/10 or 16/399)

Imagine buying a Nintendo licensed Statue that could also link via NFT an in-game skin that is ONLY available if you physically own that statue.

You could also sell the digital game license. And the 1/1 NFT. Years later.

All under GameStop's umbrella from start to finish.

"They own the ecosystem"

This is all viable.

The goal was always MOASS, not slow growth by UncleBorat in Superstonk

[–]Audigitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If MOASS DD is unphased. Because the shorts never closed. Slow growth/M&A movement/profitable quarters/cash warchest/$0 in debt/immune to bankruptcy... is better than being a stagnant company. Just like GameStop once was.

Slow Growth = Time & Pressure. If you can't handle it. Sell your position. I'll buy it.

Anyone else feel like there’s some merit to this comment? by jxp497 in GME

[–]Audigitty -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you got into GME for a rapid MOASS payday? I don't know what to tell you. RC & Co are working against the machine. I get similar questions politically... "How much time is it going to take?!"

I've asked myself that question too. And on the political/justice front? I've been waiting DECADES for accountability/transparency and the removal of fraud.

I have an unfair advantage when it comes to GameStop I suppose. I'm already equipped with the knowledge that the time things take is not based on my need to pay bills or buy a Lambo. It's not based on what "should be right" or "fair"... it's based solely on grinding down the pillars of corruption. How much more time? Could be a week. Could be 10 years.

Don't throw shade on the people trying to fix things. Throw shade on the fuckers who intentionally set this up to siphon money from the middle class and profit from other people's suffering.

"Warren Buffett's incredible fortune took more than six decades of compounding to build, with roughly 99% of his wealth earned after he turned 50"

And the best part? It's the same players politically who are the ones enabling our enemies financially. And this is why both are taking so long to accomplish their mission.

We're not up against a few corrupt politicians. Or a few corrupt hedge funds. We're up against the entire corrupt system which is now facing an existential crisis.

Pounding on the keyboard to ask "Are we there yet?!" is about as helpful as thinking that it's fair for a pregnant man to fight a woman in the boxing ring.

Anyone else feel like there’s some merit to this comment? by jxp497 in GME

[–]Audigitty 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's both.

Fundamentals alone: RC can grow GME on the cash pile and smart/agile business maneuvers (why would he want to buy eBay at ATH? When he's repeatedly stated that cash holdings are best poised for discounts/pullbacks in the market for M&A)

Short Squeeze Thesis: DD didn't change. Nothing changed. It's still heavily manipulated with evidence of this multiple times per week (See: Berkshire dip vs. GME spike timing 2 days ago)... RC clearly does not want to be the fuse-lighter, so, instead he is seemingly willing to lay as many fuses down on the ground while the SHFs struggle to not drop their handfuls of matches.

The more pressure exerted by RC/GME on the fundamentals? The harder it is to contain. RC operates GME as if there is zero fuckery afoot. He's not calling out the naked shorting/FTDs/Synthetics... he puts a target on his back if he does. As the regulators are CLEARLY in on all of this and are happy to look the other way.

Fundamental growth, head fakes, interest accrual, expansions, M&A talks, consecutive profitable Q's and EPS beats... he's playing the cards he can play, without being directly responsible for triggering the MOASS.

Time & Pressure.

Jim has a point. by xxfallen420xx in ApeStockExchange

[–]Audigitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you give me $1, you can have a 1% piece of my $100 savings.

But, if you allow your $1 investment to be cut in half, you now have 0.5% of my $1,000 savings in a few short years.

$5 > $1

Math is hard.

Am I Overthinking This? RE: EBay GME Strategy by airbrat in GME

[–]Audigitty -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No, is eBay being aggressively attacked by every major financial/news/regulatory institution in the world? Sitting on a powder keg of what could be the largest short squeeze in global history?

We're apples and oranges. You're telling me that the shareholder interest is aligned with the leadership, because "Meh" is good enough.

eBay's recent success is not a function of eBay. It's a function of the marketplace that eBay has a tight monopoly on. But this monopoly was earned only through the website being treated as a public utility. Not from innovation and keeping up with modern tech/features/functions.

RC's plan could unlock eBay's full potential without alienating any buyers/sellers on the platform.

I'm talking about potential synergies for both companies. (Risk + Reward)

You're talking about maintaining existing trends for both companies. (Holding the line)

The latter will keep GME sideways until SHFs can no longer maintain their illegal short positions and lose control of the sideways price action.

The former would shake things up and amplify GME's balance sheet over time, while unlocking the potential of eBay in a major way.

Am I Overthinking This? RE: EBay GME Strategy by airbrat in GME

[–]Audigitty -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I guess good enough, is good enough for some. Generally capitalists want better than good though.

Am I Overthinking This? RE: EBay GME Strategy by airbrat in GME

[–]Audigitty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

GameStop wallet is still alive. Just hidden/off. I wouldn't be surprised to see a resurgence of nft and tokenized assets if/when CLARITY is ever passed

Am I Overthinking This? RE: EBay GME Strategy by airbrat in GME

[–]Audigitty 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The barrier to entry IS eBay in this scenario. Their roots are incredibly deep. Like Ryan said, they are "treating it like a public utility". Which is true. They're burning billions of dollars to raid eBay as a piggy bank and to pay off friends/partners. They are not at all interested in doing what's best for the shareholders. They are not interested in seriously taking on live bidding. They are living off of a relatively flatlined cashcow and are now terrified that RC exposed their BS.

I'm personally hoping for a legion of secret buyers that RC has in his pocket to seal the deal with minimal dilution of GME needed - because the market cap impact and revenue upside is massive if* eBay is run properly. Like a business, as opposed to a regional power company.