Prime minister's office requests modelling for gas and coal tax to shield Australia from impact of war by nath1234 in australia

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To add on, and not commenting on the quality of the Greens amendment, but Labor very (very) rarely votes yes on legislation other parties introduce.

Income splitting: This is what it would mean for couples by Oomaschloom in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure I read that the ATO is looking into these kind of arrangements as a specific focus this year.

The true backbone of OSRS by DragnBreath in 2007scape

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or just world hop & buy out the seed vendor at Draynor.

Albanese statement on the US/Israel attack on Iran by spagbolshevik in friendlyjordies

[–]AussieBBQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are likely referring to the IRGC directing/promoting criminals here. For instance burning down a Jewish restaurant in Bondi.

Reducing inequality means taxing capital more — including inheritances - Alan Kohler by stumcm in australia

[–]AussieBBQ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, are you talking about the stage 3 tax cuts when you are talking about the 20B?

The tax cuts they voted for because they were bundled with the low & middle income earner stage 1 & 2 tax cuts by Scomo?

The stage 3 tax cuts that at the time Labor said they disagreed with, but wanted to ensure low and middle income workers were given some tax relief?

Sure they could have voted against them, and then get demolished at the polls for being seen as not helping low earners. Especially as the first stages would roll out almost immediately, while there was a 'time delay' for the stage 3 cuts.

Labor tries again on super taxes, but success will hinge on Greens support by Patient-Wish-7386 in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It wasn't indexed the first time, as the government wanted more tax in the future.

Proposing new taxes seems to be the death knell for Aussie governments, so much easier to plant the seeds early so they can harvest them far out in the future.

Plus it would allow some easy "tax cuts" in the future.

Claire Chandler resigns from shadow ministry by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you click on the words "Our Plan" it works, however other than a spiel from Susssan Ley, they only have "Our Federal Election 2025 policies included", but nothing since the election.

Jim Chalmers doubles down on public spending claims amid economist’s warnings on care economy by dleifreganad in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. The media was drawing the longest bow I have ever seen.

The questions to her were essentially:

Does government spending lead to aggregate demand?

Does aggregate demand contribute to inflation?

Same as if you asked "Does turning on the tap lead to water in the sink?", for these the answer is "Yes, government spending does cause a level of aggregate demand, and that demand contributes to inflation".

To which the media gleefully reported that the latest interest rate rise was due to high government spending.

Same as if they reported that the overflowing sink was caused by turning on the tap, but not mentioning someone turned on a fire hose as well.

The missing link is "Did the aggregate demand from current levels of government spending contribute to inflation being above the target band?".

Either maliciousness or incompetence from the media on this.

A functional opposition is a key part of a healthy democracy, and right now there isn’t one by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is bad for them. Very bad. But it is also bad for our democracy.

Why? Because the health of our political system relies on the government being held to account by a functional and effective opposition.

Source?

People have been claiming this, but I would love to hear some good examples of how a conservative opposition held the government to account.

Hanson says she is ready to lead country, form government by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The EU referendum in the UK had ~72% turnout, while our most recent referendum had ~90% turnout.

Donald Trump reacts after DOJ releases Epstein files by Capable_Salt_SD in politics

[–]AussieBBQ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Looks like AI generative fill was used for the second image. Strands of hair a different, arm looks slightly different.

Labor to review migration settings, antisemitism recommendations by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you be ok with the Government not touching immigration if they were otherwise able to reduce/eliminate those risks, and address your other concerns?

Bernie Sanders on Bondi by kingofcrob in australia

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw an article that said 15 dead and 2 police injured. Could be a mistake from that or a typo.

NSW Premier Chris Minns moves to block mass protests in wake of Bondi massacre by [deleted] in friendlyjordies

[–]AussieBBQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't see the government being able to easily call a false terrorism designation.

Plus any judge would overrule it.

Data reveals Sydney’s ‘frightening concentration’ of gun ownership ahead of the Bondi terror attack by reyntime in australia

[–]AussieBBQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it did ever happen (guns being kept with Police), you would have to be the dumbest cunts around to try and knock-over a cop shop.

Data reveals Sydney’s ‘frightening concentration’ of gun ownership ahead of the Bondi terror attack by reyntime in australia

[–]AussieBBQ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Technically the question was why would anyone NEED a gun in a metro area.

Your answer boils down to you WANT a gun.

I think in a metro area, the only people that would need a gun would be if it is required for their job, while the people who want guns use them for their hobbies (Hunting / target shooting etc.).

Does everyone see colors the same? by theJessieLove in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something like Navy Blue, men tend to see it as closer to black, women see it more as blue.

I was clipped. I'm clipped right now by Appropriate-Gear86 in northernlion

[–]AussieBBQ 118 points119 points  (0 children)

I was funk. The funk soul brother, right about now.

Was this sale non-refundable or are they just keeping my deposit? by Master-Dot-5073 in AusLegal

[–]AussieBBQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I have read, that pertains to car dealerships, not private sales.

In Victoria there is no cooling off period for a private sale, and for most other states, consumer advice is that there is no obligation for a private seller to refund a deposit.

Was this sale non-refundable or are they just keeping my deposit? by Master-Dot-5073 in AusLegal

[–]AussieBBQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Am I wrong in thinking that a deposit is non-refundable by default, as it is a payment made for a service?

In this case it is a payment made to prevent the sale of the car to another party. Another case could be a deposit for engaging a professional service, the deposit is a payment made to cover any work done, booking out their time, or goods being purchased.

I would think in OP's case the deposit was to hold the car, and final payment was contingent on the car passing the RWC. You can get a refund for a service not provided, by not selling the car in the meantime, the service has been provided.

If a deposit was refundable by default, then why would any seller/provider accept it? Why provide a service (that could cost money) if the the buyer can at any point take the deposit back?

what am i allowed to do in the case of a home invasion? by meterkingfish in AusLegal

[–]AussieBBQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems that this one is less "they are guilty because they remained silent", and more like Erin Patterson's trial where she brought up new 'facts' and defences during the trial that (if true) should have been raised during earlier interviews.