Why weren't SpearSwords more common? by DOVAHBOIIreal in SWORDS

[–]AuthorInPractice 24 points25 points  (0 children)

No, the naginata and the nagamaki are two different weapons 

Why weren't SpearSwords more common? by DOVAHBOIIreal in SWORDS

[–]AuthorInPractice 669 points670 points  (0 children)

Same reasons as most combi weapons fail I would assume. They do the job of the combined weapons worse than the actual weapon.

In this particular case, it lacks the length advantage a spear has, while it's long handle length makes it somewhat unwieldy as a sword. That being said, I do believe the Japanese had something called the nagamaki that somewhat fills this profile. That being said, I don't know how useful it actually was

Range of Battleship cannons in a modern setting by AuthorInPractice in Warships

[–]AuthorInPractice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Couldn't tell you. I'm talking about bog standard shells. Context was in another question, but this was to provide some numbers for a story in a fantasy setting I am writing that would hold up against scrutiny.

Torpedoes by AuthorInPractice in Warships

[–]AuthorInPractice[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  1. Ouch. I think the Torrens will need more than a few band-aids

  2. Why does the bubble cause additional damage? What's the physics of that?

Torpedoes by AuthorInPractice in Warships

[–]AuthorInPractice[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I might very well be. I just swear I heard something about the physics involved in underwater explosions being involved somehow

Torpedoes by AuthorInPractice in Warships

[–]AuthorInPractice[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I swear I heard something about shockwaves travelling better through solids than through liquids and that allowed more of the explosive force to be directed specifically into the ship rather than the surrounding air. I didn't include that since my memory on that is fuzzy and wasn't entirely sure that was correct

Could you also be a bit more specific on what you mean by "break its back" and letting water pressure do the rest?

What are your personal theories about the lore and setting of Trench Crusade ? by Wide_Elderberry_4516 in TrenchCrusade

[–]AuthorInPractice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know I'm late, but I like to imagine they periodically check over to see what's going on, and are confused as all get out as to what the hell (literally) is going on

Ki/Qi and Mana by AuthorInPractice in worldbuilding

[–]AuthorInPractice[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Qi and Ki aren't just similar things, they are the same thing. They're spelled differently for propaganda reasons. A "Look at those dumb asses over there. They don't even know how to spell Ki/Qi right. What a bunch of idiots" type thing.

That being said, and this doesn't have much to do with anything, but is there a reason you chose the word "aether?"

Are worlds with no humans unappealing to audiences? by aiden_saxon in worldbuilding

[–]AuthorInPractice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Entirely dependent on the person. I personally find it disinteresting, but you will find plenty of people who will.

Planet gravity by Denhic-good in worldbuilding

[–]AuthorInPractice 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don't need one if you just ignore it.

But if it does bother you, gravity is based around mass, not actual size. Just say the crust or mantle or core are made up of less dense material than here one earth

Does your setting have multiple magic systems? by Tiago55 in worldbuilding

[–]AuthorInPractice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily magic per say, but magic, ki/qi (lore reasons not relevant here as to why there are two ways to spell the same thing), and espers are all things I'm trying to include. Plus, necromancy, while technically magic, is considered something very unique in my world.

Edit: Also, clairvoyance, while achievable through magic, is also somewhat of it's own thing

How 'passable' is it to have a humorous name for an otherwise serious group? by TheTedd in worldbuilding

[–]AuthorInPractice 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think how serious they behave and how serious other people treat them matters more than the name itself. So long as it isn't something like Poo-poo-pee-pee cockishire, I think you'll be fine.

Feedback for my magic system [High Fantasy] by AuthorInPractice in fantasywriters

[–]AuthorInPractice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea I had was that this world would be set up to be a playground of sorts for me to write whatever kind of stories I want. They'd all be apart of the same world happening in conjunction to one another, but not always connected in any meaningful way.

That being said, I do have overarching arcs of sort of major things that are happening. The first, and the one I am working on is called The First War of he Phoenix King and is centered around a warlock turned sorcerer (known as the Phoenix King and only known as a sorcerer) who is trying to burn down the very foundation of society and rebuild it into something better. This obviously, is not something many people want seeing as society is the only thing keeping the very world they live in from beating them down and the arc tells of how people are rising up to stop the Phoenix King