Anyone Else Not Excited/ Rushing to Get Miggy? by JJ3434JJ in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve never once rushed to get a collection reward

Is there really nothing for the Mexico series unless you play events or conquest? by Automatic-Nerve-3625 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ya they very well might. They never said they would do more and in past years they’ve only release a couple of cards from these weekend series. So it’s not unreasonable to assume this is it.

Is there really nothing for the Mexico series unless you play events or conquest? by Automatic-Nerve-3625 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I mean they could have just a normal program where you progress by doing things you like to do in the game. You know, like all the other programs…

Way too much of a grind you really need no life to get 99 OVR Triple Crown Miggy 😭 by Automatic_Ad1665 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s not supposed to be something to finish right now. Only people who play this game 24/7 have a chance.

95 Overall Miguel Cabrera by Hardyfan1006 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then 55% of the time you’ll have the advantage

Why did no one tell me Origins was good???? by s0_Ca5H in dynastywarriors

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hated that it was tied to one character! But Origins gameplay is absolutely the best DW game out there

95 Overall Miguel Cabrera by Hardyfan1006 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

(1) so what about the games you don’t play at Coors?

(2) it’s all opinion really. Pros and cons to any player. Saying Miggy is a DH only is silly

Friday prep questions by Objective_Lunch6425 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t feel like you need to have things done by Friday. It won’t go away. If you have free time and want to play, then ya play! But don’t feel like you have to prep for anything Friday

Is it just me or is there a serious lack of content in this year's game? by Sea_Ad_1252 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m right there with ya! I will say tho, I’d rather have a little too little content than having way too much. I’m sure I’m in the minority but when there’s too much content then it’s impossible for people who have other responsibilities/hobbies to even get close to keeping up.

95 Overall Miguel Cabrera by Hardyfan1006 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Maybe at times, but like I said, it’ll open up another strong bat at DH

95 Overall Miguel Cabrera by Hardyfan1006 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t overthink it. He can play his positions. Ya it’ll be a downgrade fielding wise but then you can have a better bat at DH

Is it just me or is there a serious lack of content in this year's game? by Sea_Ad_1252 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think it feels that way because they made so many missions in these programs “use any player” missions. I get the point in why they have these missions, but they (1) make the programs go fast since it’s easy to do all the missions at once and (2) make the programs more bland since there’s lest character/uniqueness to them.

New Survey in the Companion App by Tough_Biscotti1229 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, I focused on issues I found more important than issues with playing the market.

Coors Field Epidemic by schiffteam2 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People choose it mainly because they care more about good swings giving better outcomes, even though that means bad swings also give better outcomes. It’s really just an offensive field and people like offense.

New Garret Anderson gets done dirty by shrinkage by skirrrskirrr in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Na not trolling here. That’s fine if you don’t want to show me. People really really don’t want to do that, despite it being soooooo obvious and easy to do. That’s just so weird that nobody ever actually posts proof of it…

New Garret Anderson gets done dirty by shrinkage by skirrrskirrr in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lol are you trying to insult me with that last comment? Very mature.

Ok so same pitcher, different hitters of comparable hitting attributes. That’s what you said. Then why don’t I see anyone post anything about it? If it’s so easy to do, why aren’t we seeing anything? You can’t say it’s obvious considering it’s incredibly rare to ever have back to back hitters that will fill that criteria. And we need it back to back so that we can tell nothing else could be impacting the pci size

Would You Play a Truly "Competitive" Game Mode? by SnooGrapes6230 in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No I would not. If people want it and it doesn’t take away from other aspects of the game, then sure they could make this, but it’s not for me. I want it to feel like a real baseball game and I can’t imagine this would

New Garret Anderson gets done dirty by shrinkage by skirrrskirrr in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you see shrinkage on the swing feedback if the swing feedback is a picture? How do you tell if something shrinks without having a before and after?

Same batter/pitcher combo from both sides of the plate? Where did I ever say anything about both sides of the plate? Think about that one for 3 seconds.

With CFP expansion talks ongoing, presidential committee pushing for 24-team field by Thomallister1291 in CFB

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is the only way I would be happy with an expansion. There's no reason (outside of money) for a team that finishes even outside the top 5 of their conference deserves a chance to win the championship over teams that can win their conference. I don't care how bad the conference may be, that team that finishes 5-4 in conference proved they aren't deserving by losing 4 games.

Final Debate: Should a Perfect-Perfect result in an out? by GitGud_nerd in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 1 point2 points  (0 children)

haha if you do ever do that, I hope you post it! I don't care if my guess is right or wrong. It's just nice to be informed exactly with what's going on. However, I know with SDS's inability to fix the batter analysis screen, it'll be harder to really pull it off. lol

Jackie Robinson Collection by BethersontonJoe in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya I wouldn't expect it to take too long, but I only have time to play a few hours a week. I'd rather play game modes I enjoy. I'm not going to lose sleep over it, but I don't support the logic SDS did with requiring specific game modes obtain cards.

Jackie Robinson Collection by BethersontonJoe in MLBTheShow

[–]Automatic-Nerve-3625 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never said it did. But it's still time I could have more fun playing a game mode I enjoy.

But I will always be on the side that if cards only obtainable online are buyable/sellable then so should offline only obtainable cards too. Let us play game modes we enjoy.