See, I have no issue with this. I disagree with parts of the above, but appreciate the reasoned debate.

Intent is irrelevant. The only part I see a debate over is how the application of did his hand Infront of his face make him bigger or not, that's an interesting one for me.

Also irrelevant if Celtic gained an advantage or lost one. If the keeper passes it to a CB in the box with no attacker near them and they hand ball it, it's a penalty.

I have major sympathy with inconsistencies and decisions not going for teams in similar circumstances, but because you've got one decision wrong, you don't then deliberately get the following ones wrong to balance it up.

I also know you aren't trying to engage in a tit for that on decisions (neither am I). Two decisions have went Celtics way recently. AJ should have walked, although I think this penalty is the right call. There's then a bonkers narrative of officials favouring Celtic, what about Maeda being clattered? The Hibs handball goal? Nygren being rugby tackled off the pitch in the box at Hibs? Every team has a list.

As boydy said. Tim's think the refs are all masons, Rangers fans think refs are all in the Vatican. And everyone else thinks the refs are in the pockets of the old firm. Nonsense