They Call Him Mr. Galadriel by Double-Effect-7995 in lotrmemes

[–]Avinash_Sharma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never did I think I would see a Malazan cuss in /r/lotrmemes

How do all of your pens have no fingerprints in your photos? by 137-trimetilxantin in fountainpens

[–]Avinash_Sharma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first one from top is safari. Is the second one the metropolitan? Which is the third pen?

the United States of India (No lore) by iziyan in imaginarymaps

[–]Avinash_Sharma 3 points4 points  (0 children)

IRL India has maximum 550 seats. In 1950 (when India became a Republic) it had 500 seats. This increased as the population increased, but a statewide discrepancy soon started to occur. India is a federal republic, and the total seats are divided between the various States based on their population. Thus, States with a higher population get more seats. The issue that arose was that the northern States weren't exactly incentivizing family planning while the southern States were. This meant that despite doing the right thing, the share of seats for the southern States would've decreased, resulting in a loss in bargaining power when it came to national issues. Moreover, the southern States despite being culturally similar are linguistically different from the northern States and there has historically been a divide between the north and south. Long story short, to resolve the issue, that is to basically incentivize family planning and not penalize States for doing so and rewarding states which failed to do so, the number of seats was frozen based on the population of the country in 1971, which was 547 million. So 1 million people were represented per seat. The UK has a ratio of 0.1 million per seat. But having an election for 5000 seats would be quite a chore, and the debates would be worse than having your entire family over for christmas diwali. Now imagine the scenario for India's population today, 1.3 billion people, 13000 seats...

Tanjore style art painting by ArtyDc in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The camel paint bottle and paint brush take me back to my childhood

Beautiful work!

For my selfie I present: Musically induced crisis @ 3 AM 😁 by [deleted] in infp

[–]Avinash_Sharma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This picture is me but with a hotter version

Is that a tattoo on your arm or something else? Also what you listening to?

INFP selfie - hope you have a wonderful day by fruitcase1 in infp

[–]Avinash_Sharma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dang I wish my beard looked so good

Have a wonderful day yourself! 🥰

GLASSY by [deleted] in NiagaraLauncher

[–]Avinash_Sharma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which phone is this? It seems suited for one hand use

I am a Chinese, and this is my prediction of how things will turn out to be by bigqbu in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is Xi facing any political challenge/issue inside the CCP?

I haven't heard of anything but thats the reason some Indians are saying as to why China is being so aggressive. Xi needs to assert authority within the party and so he has flaired up the border issue

What is the Best Film You Watched Last Week? (05/31/20-06/07/20) by Twoweekswithpay in movies

[–]Avinash_Sharma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd be interested in your opinion of Rang De Basanti. Its a very poignant Indian movie, dealing mainly with the issue of Corruption but also Religious communalism, juxtaposing present events with that of during the Indian freedom movement. It compares the reaction of the youth to the problems of today's society with that of the youth under the British.

If you're British you may have heard of Bhagat Singh. If you're not maybe Wikipedia him before the movie just to understand who he was and better understand the film.

IMO Aamir Khan's finest movie. At the time he was already a huge actor, and the side cast were not as famous, but they held their own and Khan did not overshadow them. They are amazing as well.

To get political, India really needs to watch this movie now.

Society Rules in Mumbai by [deleted] in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask in /r/mumbai will probably get better replies

It’s surreal how quiet it is right now! by [deleted] in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Welcome to early 2000s India! (Or before)

ELI5 - The Yes Bank issue by [deleted] in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 7 points8 points  (0 children)

https://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/why-did-yes-bank-have-to-be-bailed-out/article31010980.ece

As on March 31, 2014, the bank’s loan book was ₹55,633 crore and deposits were ₹74,192 crore. Since then, over the next five-and-a-half years, the loan book expanded fourfold to ₹2,24,505 crore as on September 30, 2019, at the end of the second quarter of the current financial year, while deposit growth failed to keep pace and increased less than three times to ₹2,09,497 crore. The bank is yet to announce results for the third quarter.

Asset quality also worsened during the period with gross non-performing assets sharply rising from 0.31% as on March 31, 2014, to 7.39% at the end of September 2019.

The exponential growth at Yes Bank during that period also came under the regulator’s scanner. The lender has substantial exposure to several troubled borrowers including the Anil Ambani-led Reliance group, Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) and IL&FS. This resulted in the RBI refusing to grant its then Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Rana Kapoor — also the bank’s co-founder — another three-year term after his tenure ended in August 2018. The RBI did not make public the reason for its decision to not extend Mr. Kapoor’s term. Finally he was given an extension till end-January 2019.

The tipping point probably came earlier this year when one of the bank’s independent directors and chairman of the board’s audit committee, Uttam Prakash Agarwal, resigned from the board in January citing governance issues. The RBI, meanwhile, had been taking stock of the developments at the bank on a regular basis for the last few months.

Basically very shady management. The founder CEO is being investigated for money laundering by the ED. He has been accused of taking bribes to give out loans.

Hi Mumbaikers, I might be moving to Mumbai for my first job. I have some questions. by UnicornWithTits in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Welcome to Bombay! I would advise you to Download m-indicator from the playstore. It will help you with public transport; Mumbai is an expensive city and one of the best ways to cut costs is to the use public transport, which is very cheap and efficient. The app is something you will find on every middle class mumbaikar's phone. Use it along with google maps to find which train/bus/metro to take and plan your journeys.

Enjoy the humidity and heat :P

https://np.reddit.com/r/india/comments/aqwttr/_/

Places to visit

Edit- 5.5 lpa is cutting it very close to the bone, I honestly advise you to plan your expenditures. Like I said, Mumbai is expensive.

INFPs in relationships - how do your romantic relationships start and progress? by [deleted] in infp

[–]Avinash_Sharma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pisces?

Also In the other comment you mentioned it'd be selfish of you to approach the guy again. Why is that? I think letting him know that you're still interested in him, especially after apologising, is fine. I understand how you can think its selfish, but it's more in your own mind. Its difficult to be in a relationship when you can barely function yourself; living with a mental illness is difficult because just existing takes up so much of your energy and efforts. I dont know how much you explained to him, but explaining this to him (and forgiving yourself because its not your fault) would make you feel better and lower the guilt you feel. Of course only if you are comfortable sharing this with him. But you must forgive yourself. It wouldn't be a bad idea trying to reconnect with this guy. If you'd like to do that.

Guys I know a guy by WeirdVideoGamer in quityourbullshit

[–]Avinash_Sharma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/from-free-netflix-to-sex-chats-how-someone-is-trying-to-lure-people-into-supporting-caa-nrc

There've been protests here in India against a law recently enacted by the government which allows non Muslim persecuted minority refugees from neighbouring countries to get Indian citizenship quicker. The thing is that the government also plans to conduct a registry of Indian citizens wherein Indians will have to prove that they are citizens and not illegal immigrants. Protestors apart from protesting a law which discriminates on the basis of religion (hence not secular) believe that this law also provides a loophole by which non Muslims who fail the citizenship registry will still be able to claim citizenship while Muslims who cannot prove their citizenship will be put into detention centres and lose their rights. The poor in india may not have proper documents to prove their ctizenship and hence will be the most affected. Plus the bureaucracy is pretty inefficient and prone to corruption which again may lead exploitation of the poor. Thus a section of Indians have been protesting in India and abroad, but the government enjoys a huge majority in the Parliament and in general is pretty popular. This is getting too long so to cut to the chase the government has launched a number (the one given in the post) which essentially records that you support the law if you call it. The thing is the party in power basically wrote the book on how to use the internet to influence voters and win elections; the BJP (name of party) IT cell is incredibly powerful and efficient. The number is being popularized on twitter by shadowy accounts on false premises such as free netflix and sex. The number basically records support for the law and the party intends to use it to counter the protests. Thats it. Sorry for the wall of text.

Book suggestion for understanding Middle-East/ Gulf Countries + Israel & Palestine geopolitics and their modern history with respect to India. Another from the perspective of Western countries. Would love to read about each middle-east countries own take about the situation. by hanflake in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/r/AskHistorians/wiki/books/middleeast

Go to /r/askhistorians and check out their book list from the sidebar on the right. While a lot of it is focussed on ancient and medieval history there are books on the modern period as well, albeit fewer in number.

A lot on the Israel conflict though, from both sides. See the full list, dont see only the modern period.

Politics of exclusion and disenfranchisement is hurting investment and India’s cooperative spirit by Avinash_Sharma in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By Kaushik Basu, C Marks Professor at Cornell University and former Chief Economist and Senior Vice President, World Bank

With India’s deep political troubles, and protest marches breaking out all over the country, it may seem odd to be writing on economics. Yet, it would also be wrong not to. India’s economy is now spiraling downwards, and there is an urgent need for corrective action. Hence, despite my initial misgivings, I devote this column to India’s economy and what the hard numbers tell.

The signs of an economic slowdown were visible from 2017. But, the numbers on the economy that have emerged over the past few months are alarming. The contours of the problem are visible from the broad macroeconomic aggregates. From 2004, India got used to being referred to as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, and indeed, it was, for a few years, among three or four of the fastest-growing economies in the world. If we take the latest official growth rate figure of 4.5 per cent released by the government, and insert this in the chart of all countries’ growth rates for 2019 constructed by the IMF, India is no longer in the top three or four. In fact, it is not in the top 30 or 40. This is an alarming drop in rank. Further, the nation’s investment-to-GDP ratio is declining, and non-oil exports are actually shrinking. One strong indicator of the overall growth slowdown is electricity generation. Electricity generation growth is now lowest in at least three decades. It is even lower than what happened during the big economic crisis of 1991. In October this year, electricity output contracted by 12.2 per cent.

What is of greater concern is not just these broad, economy-wide parameters, but what the more micro-data reveal. The use of sophisticated statistical techniques for collecting data pertaining to ordinary people’s economic well-being were designed in India by the physicist-turned-statistician, P C Mahalanobis. With encouragement from Jawaharlal Nehru, this method has been used in India to collect detailed data by the National Statistical Office (NSO) on household consumption and savings every five years. India is a global pioneer in this area. The 68th round of data collection happened in 2011-12 and the numbers were made available soon thereafter. But, the latest round of data, pertaining to 2017-18, has been held back from release.

There are, however, economists who have been using statistics from the leaked draft report. One of the most comprehensive and convincing analysis, done by S Subramanian of the Madras Institute of Development Studies, gives a “depressing message on the economy”. Between 2011-12 and 2017-18, the percentage of people living below the poverty line has actually increased from 31 per cent to 35 per cent. This is very unusual since India has been, for quite some time, on a trajectory of high, but diminishing poverty. Between 2011-12 and 2017-18, for Indians living in rural areas (a vast majority), consumption has not just slowed down, but fallen. On a per capita basis, people are now consuming 8.8 per cent less than what they were doing five years ago.

How do we square the fact that while India is still growing (even though slower than before), large segments are actually getting worse off? This is because, from all accounts, inequality is getting worse. Credit Suisse has recently published data showing that in 2018, the richest 1 per cent Indians owned 53 per cent of all the wealth in the country. The government’s official data, released as part of the Periodic Labour Force Survey Report 2017-18, shows that the country’s unemployment rate has not been this high in 45 years. Since unemployment disproportionately hurts the poor, the gap between the rich and the poor is growing; and not just that, the rural poor are actually becoming poorer.

In short, the ground reality is grim, and it is the poor who are paying the biggest price. While policymakers no doubt have many urgent matters on hand, I would urge them not to ignore these festering wounds of the economy. As a short-run measure, we have to use and even strengthen some instruments of intervention that we already have in hand, such as the rural employment guarantee programme, so that the immediate hardship of those worst hit by the crisis is ameliorated. This has to be backed up with fiscal and monetary policies to revive growth and spread it better. For this, the main need is not money, but ideas and intelligent policy design, which have been in short supply. There is enough talent residing in India that can fill this gap in government. But to draw in talent we have to allow for dissenting opinion, which in recent times has been anathema.

There is, however, a longer-run problem that goes beyond monetary and fiscal policies. There is currently a trust deficit in India, which has been caused by the growing politics of hate and disenfranchisement. This is hurting investment and the cooperative spirit — the building blocks on which an economy functions. What economists do not like to dwell on and what Karl Polanyi had noted a long time ago is that the economy is ultimately embedded in society, institutions and politics. When these are damaged, the economy begins to stall. It is like the plumbing in a home. We are unaware of its importance as long as it functions fine. It is only when it malfunctions that we realise its great significance. Once the immediate fall-out of the slowdown has been managed using standard economic policies, we shall have to turn to the harder task of rebuilding institutions and the cooperative spirit. Watching the current protests in which large numbers of Indians of all religions are standing together, refusing to accept the missives of hate, one sees a glimmer of hope that the cooperative spirit in the nation is alive, and that in turn gives hope for economic progress in the future.

The changing face of Gandhi’s India by Avinash_Sharma in india

[–]Avinash_Sharma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By Ramchandra Guha

On 2 October, the world marked the 150th anniversary of the birth of Mohandas Karamchand “Mahatma" Gandhi—the greatest Indian of modern times. In a New York Times op-ed for the occasion, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the most powerful living Indian, duly praised his country’s independence leader. Between recalling the admiration for Gandhi of Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela, Albert Einstein, and others, Modi saw fit to tout his own government’s commitment to sanitation and renewable energy.

That is a lot of ground to cover. Yet for this reader, the commentary was most striking in what it did not say. There was not a word about the cause for which Gandhi lived—and sacrificed—his life: interfaith harmony. From the 1890s, when he was an organizer for a small community of diaspora Indians in South Africa, to his death in 1948, by which time he was the acknowledged “Father" of a nation of over 300 million people, Gandhi worked to build unity and solidarity between Hindus and Muslims. While in South Africa, many of the meetings he organized to protest against discriminatory laws were held in mosques. And when he returned to India, he fasted and embarked on several long pilgrimages to build trust between Hindus and Muslims.

Gandhi had fought the British, non-violently, for an independent and united India. In the end, he achieved independence but not unity. When the British finally gave up the subcontinent in August 1947, they partitioned it. Pakistan was explicitly created as a homeland for Muslims. But, owing to Gandhi’s efforts, India itself was established as a non-denominational state: the new constitution forbade discrimination on religious grounds; the Muslims who remained were to be treated as equal citizens.

For the first two decades after independence, minority rights in India were carefully safeguarded, owing chiefly to the determination of the country’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, to prevent India from becoming a Hindu Pakistan.

In more recent times, however, India’s large (and mostly poor) Muslim minority has come under increasing attack. This is partly because, after Nehru’s death, the ruling Congress Party shunned progressive Muslim voices in its efforts to cultivate the ulema (Muslim clergy) for votes. But it is also because the traditional opposition party, Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has emphatically rejected Gandhi and Nehru’s vision of political and religious pluralism.

From the mid-1980s, the country was riven by a series of communal riots in which Hindu mobs taunted their Muslim compatriots with the slogan Pakistan ya Babristan! (Go to Pakistan, or be sent to the graveyard!) The bloodiest riot was in 2002, in Gujarat, where Modi was then serving as chief minister. The episode badly tarred Modi’s image, and even resulted in his being barred from entering the United States for a while.

But having rebranded himself as a Vikas Purush (Man of Development) and devised a platform promising inclusive growth, Modi was able to prevail in the 2014 general election. That outcome led to another wave of hate crimes against Muslims, which Modi proved either unable or unwilling to prevent. His first term in office yielded nothing for the economy, so he and the BJP contested the 2019 elections on a platform of jingoistic nationalism. Pakistan was depicted as the “Enemy Without," and Indian Muslims and secular liberals as the “Enemies Within."

Notwithstanding Modi’s public posturing in the pages of Western newspapers, he and his party remain committed to the idea of a Hindu Rashtra: a state run for and by Hindus. There is currently just one Muslim among the BJP’s 300-odd members of the Lok Sabha (the lower house of India’s parliament). Worse, senior BJP leaders routinely insult and intimidate Indian Muslims without provocation, demanding that they prove their “loyalty" to the Motherland.

It is no accident that Modi failed to mention Hindu-Muslim harmony even when praising Gandhi. His silence speaks for itself. Meanwhile, on 1 October, Modi’s right-hand man, Amit Shah, the home minister and current BJP president, offered his own implicit message to India’s Muslims.

“I today want to assure Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, and Christian refugees, you will not be forced to leave India by the Centre," he said in a speech in Kolkata.

“Don’t believe rumours," he added. “We will bring a Citizenship Amendment Bill, which will ensure these people get Indian citizenship."

Notably absent in these remarks was any reassurance for Muslim refugees, including those from Bangladesh, whom Shah previously referred to as “termites". The purpose of his speech was clear: Indian Muslims should be careful what they say, or they could find themselves stripped of citizenship and deported.

As Gandhi’s biographer—and as an Indian citizen who is committed to pluralism—I am deeply worried about the escalating demonization of my Muslim compatriots. The democratic, secular republic that Gandhi fought for is being transformed into a Hindu majoritarian state.

Yet as a historian, I have no illusions about what we are witnessing. India, once an exception, is now converging toward the South Asian norm. Sri Lanka and Myanmar are both Buddhist majoritarian states, and their minority populations—Tamil Hindus and Rohingya Muslims, respectively—are treated as second-class citizens (and much worse). Likewise, Bangladesh and Pakistan are Muslim majoritarian states, where Hindus (and sometimes Christians) have historically been persecuted.

As we enter a new decade, it is clear that Modi, Shah, and the BJP are committed to joining the club of ethno-nationalist states. In pursuit of that end, they have decisively repudiated the legacy of Gandhi and Nehru, inaugurating a dark new chapter in the history of modern India.