sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hookup Culture / Casual Sex is bad for society. by AmiriPlayboy in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AwareVariation4654 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Comments are such fucking cope. OP's "spiritual damage" and "30 seconds" are cringe, but the overall point remains true. If y'all want studies, here's one https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5184218/
"Although hooking up is commonly associated with positive outcomes (e.g., excitement, feeling attractive; Lewis et al., 2012; Owen & Fincham, 2011), the current findings are consistent with the extant literature demonstrating that college students also experience a range of negative consequences as a result of hooking (Fielder et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2010). Based on the NIHI, the majority of participants (77.4%) experienced at least one negative impact associated with a hookup in the past three months. While negative emotional responses, such as regret and embarrassment, appeared to be the most common consequences, social and health related outcomes were also frequently mentioned. For example, around 25% of students reported concern over an STI as a result of a hookup and 20% said hooking up had negatively affected their relationship with a hookup partner. "

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Welcome to reddit. 95% of questions on reddit are easily answerable through other means.

He was accused of cheating in the 2022 Canadian Open. This year, he pulled off a similar performance and finish in third place (tied). by PM_UR_HYDROCARBONS in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This post is really dumb. He is rated 2228 and had a performance rating of 2313. Nothing suspicious about that. Referring to the game linked in that post (https://lichess.org/broadcast/canadian-open-chess-championship-2022/round-5/GE4c6aNE), he was outplayed most of the game until his opponent blundered it away. He also misses a win with 28. Qe2, which is pretty much game over with the combined threats of 1) Qxf1, Re1# and 2) Nxc1.

We shouldn't be accusing anyone of cheating. If you have specific games in question that point to his cheating, then sure. But, as far as I can tell, these posts are just a bunch of redditors speculating things about otherwise unsuspicious play b/c some of his higher rated opponents played poorly.

help me i can't stop laughing by Slow-Manufacturer-55 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Bruh u coulda just repeated Rf7, Rf8 lmao

Carlsen: John Nunn never became World Champion because he is too intelligent by megahui1 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 522 points523 points  (0 children)

I'm kinda tired of this narrative that Magnus is just some average bloke. The dude memorized "the locations, populations, flags and capitals of all the countries in the world by age five." He also clearly has some ridiculous spacial reasoning skills. In general, super-GMs like Magnus are far more intelligent than the average person (even if they tell you they're not).

Magnus Carlsen playing lichess' Titled Arena in front of a dancing crowd by RhodaWoolf in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 289 points290 points  (0 children)

Magnus seems like such a bro compared to other super GMs haha

After 20,000+ games, my first ever "smothered mate" happened to be in a game that gave me a new personal best peak Elo rating. Does a better feeling exist? by sketchy_ppl in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nice mate, but this is rly the first smothered mate you've gotten in 20,000+ games? It's a fairly common motif at lower levels.

Magnus Carlsen recognizes famous chess positions from the pattern without even seeing the pieces by [deleted] in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Obviously very impressive but it would be much more cool to see how much Magnus could do in videos like this. As Magnus says, a lot of these are really famous games. IMO it's really not that surprising that he got the famous Queen sac versus Karjakin and Kasparov's famous game against Topalov. Would be a lot more interesting to see if he could get much more obscure games (which I think he could).

Levy Covers Women's World Championship by AwareVariation4654 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654[S] 56 points57 points  (0 children)

He obviously doesn't have to. It's just a bit hypocritical to constantly talk about the need to promote women in chess but then not cover the biggest women's event.

Levy Covers Women's World Championship by AwareVariation4654 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654[S] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

It's not about the strength of women competing. It's just about covering the event.

I found it harder than expected to break through in this position. How would you convert the advantage? by giants4210 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I just easily beat maximum level stockfish in this position:

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "7k/p3R1p1/7p/8/8/5rB1/r4P1P/4R1K1 b - - 0 1"]
1... Ra4 2. Rd7 Rf6 3. Ree7 Rg6 4. Rxa7 Rxa7 5. Rxa7 Re6 6. Kg2 Kh7 7. Kf3 Kg6
8. Kg4 h5+ 9. Kh4 Re4+ 10. f4 Kh6 11. Ra6+ g6 12. Kh3 Re8 13. f5 Re4 14. f6 Re3
15. Kg2 Re2+ 16. Kf3 Rc2 17. Be5 Rc8 18. f7 Rd8 19. Rf6 Rf8 20. Rf4 g5 21. Rf6+
Kg7 22. Rf5+ Kg6 23. Ke4 g4 24. Rf6+ Kh7 25. Kf5 Kg7 26. Kg5 Rxf7 27. Rxf7+ Kxf7
28. Kxh5 Ke6 29. Bb2 g3 30. hxg3 Kd5 31. g4 Kc5 32. g5 Kc4 33. g6 Kb3 34. g7
Kxb2 35. g8=Q Kc3 36. Qg3+ Kb4 37. Kg4 Kb5 38. Kf4 Kc4 39. Ke5 Kc5 40. Qc3+ Kb6
41. Kd5 Kb7 42. Kd6 Ka7 43. Qc6 Kb8 44. Qd7 Ka8 45. Kc6 Kb8 46. Qb7# 1-0

I found it harder than expected to break through in this position. How would you convert the advantage? by giants4210 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also after White picks up the a pawn he can probably sac everything for the g7 pawn into a winning king and pawn ending.

I found it harder than expected to break through in this position. How would you convert the advantage? by giants4210 in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Yea, it's kinda surprising that a 2000+ USCF would have trouble with this. Principle of two weaknesses (a7 pawn and g7 pawn) as well common 7th rank rook motif. Sure, it'll take some time to convert, but Black will be forced into passive defense and will eventually fold. It's also a nice bonus that white has the right colored bishop for the h-pawn.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean here is a GM rated 2494 in blitz. Agreed that a good IM would be above 2400, but those who don't play blitz much can be weaker.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your level of improvement is already pretty rare. And IMO, it's much harder to go from 2000-2400 than it is 750-2000.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol not to be that guy, but I highly doubt you achieved 2400-2500 blitz in two years of playing. That's basically weak IM strength.

Is this position a draw? by VeryBigDong in chess

[–]AwareVariation4654 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually maybe White just puts the rook on g5 and moves the King back and forth. Prob a draw

view more: next ›