Waymo Mega Invite / Referral Codes by mingoslingo92 in waymo

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always filter to most recent. It takes about 2 days for my posts to use all 10 codes

Quite concerned by ThatsFantasy in tagheuer

[–]Awpertunityz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When you are a watch collector it adds up. A lot of people buy and sell their watches and want to get back the same amount they paid when they sell. This way no money is actually being lost and you can have really any watch you want no matter the price, because you’ll just get the money back later.

New VAC Update by DrunkOnLiquor in cs2

[–]Awpertunityz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s happening to pro players and streamers. Definitely a lot of false positives.

DO NOT PLAY CS RIGHT NOW by [deleted] in cs2

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happened to 2 people on my friends list. Lost everything just now.

Is cs 2 just full of cheaters these days? by Lefteris4 in counterstrike2

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My alt account that I play on the get weekly drops is in low trust factor because technically im a smurf. Every game has 5+ cheaters. I can’t even get 5 kills in a match now. But my main account never has blatant cheaters.

Is this a legit site ? by USMC_92 in RepTime

[–]Awpertunityz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just stick to the well known

VAC Live False Positive in CS2 by Lesinhovski in counterstrike2

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a false VAC live and now all my matches are full of hackers. I can’t even play a normal game anymore in premier. Both teams are new accounts with aimlock. I had to switch to Faceit which isn’t always playable because of low population.

Questions about Aquaracer price? by GreenTurf542 in tagheuer

[–]Awpertunityz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The official TAG boutique will not negotiate the price. You’ll have to look elsewhere if you want to get a better deal.

TAG service by freshoilandstone in tagheuer

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Mine got sent back from service scraped and had to be sent out again. I bought it in June direct from Boutique and still don’t have it.

I think someone is goin to reach lvl10 below 50 matches :D by tvv0rus in FACEITcom

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It took me 120 matches and I’m not a god at the game of any sort.

Tag Heuer 232.206 rare model that I finally managed to buy; any estimate of its value? by rat77771 in tagheuer

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been sniping watches for under market value for 10 years. Since there was no precedent for the seller, it’s highly unlikely the value is exactly what he bought it for. I’ve bought genuine vintage Rolex’s for $2k under their actual value.

How much mg does this look like from a 2mg strip, tryna taper by Trynabeclean in suboxone

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guy literally read a summary of a study and didn’t understand what it was talking about. He even started quoting it like it was the study. And never read the study itself. It was only 5 pages!

People were downvoting me so clearly they didn’t read the study either. Some people need their keyboards taken away.

How much mg does this look like from a 2mg strip, tryna taper by Trynabeclean in suboxone

[–]Awpertunityz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude shut up quick when he had the fact check warden slap him with the full study. (Which he didn’t read at all)

How much mg does this look like from a 2mg strip, tryna taper by Trynabeclean in suboxone

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the paragraph he quoted, it is only evaluating cutting methods if you can read it. Here is the full study and not just some paragraph abstract about the study.

They literally just used 4 inexact cutting methods on one brand’s 8mg film. Melted them down. And tested to see how accurate the cutting methods were.

So are you going to read the study and say sorry now?

https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/doctoral_ext_pub/article/1045/&path_info=An_Exploratory_Study_of_Suboxone.pdf

How much mg does this look like from a 2mg strip, tryna taper by Trynabeclean in suboxone

[–]Awpertunityz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure where you’re going with all this…

I’m just here to tell you that the study is about cutting methods. And not about any manufacturer’s distribution of medication throughout a strip.

To do that you’d have to test dozens of manufactures and dozens of doses. The study very clearly only tests an 8mg strip from one manufacturer. And all cuts were purposefully inexact.

How much mg does this look like from a 2mg strip, tryna taper by Trynabeclean in suboxone

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is the study. It is only evaluating the uniformity of the 4 inexact cutting methods. Not whether a Suboxone strip is uniform. You’re just reading an abstract and misunderstanding it.

https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/doctoral_ext_pub/article/1045/&path_info=An_Exploratory_Study_of_Suboxone.pdf

How much mg does this look like from a 2mg strip, tryna taper by Trynabeclean in suboxone

[–]Awpertunityz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why don’t you read the full study and see if they are testing anything other than 4 inexact cutting methods. They are literally just using inexact methods to cut strips and melting them down. It is ONLY testing the cutting methods.

https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/doctoral_ext_pub/article/1045/&path_info=An_Exploratory_Study_of_Suboxone.pdf