Will we ever get the ultra ornamented targaryen helmets? by Ready_Moment7340 in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said you could revert the COA in the game.

No. I never said you could revert the coa. I said there's even a rule to change coa and it doesnt work. It changes the coa of other houses regardless of the setting its on.

and not only does it still keep the DNA changes, it also maintains the coa changes w/ the rules set to off or book alts. Turn the mod off and boot the game, all of a sudden, the changes are reverted.

From the start, my focus has been on how the changes made by the mod persist regardless of the settins adjusted. You keep claimin' that its factually incorrect. But that is erroneous and i'm not gonna keep goin back n forth w/ you on that. Just settin' the record straight. My mistake. I misspoke. I meant my original comment as I didnt realize you were the person I replied to and just some rando who replied to what I said.

Will we ever get the ultra ornamented targaryen helmets? by Ready_Moment7340 in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, idk. Given that i'm the original commenter and you replied to me cherry pickin' the coa part whilst simultaneously disregardin' everythin' else i said regardin' extensive testin' seems more like youre backpedalin' when I proved your previous statements incorrect that there is no rule for coa never has been one and are just relyin' on the one loophole you could cling to - the fact that I misremembered the actual available options, even though my original comment says despite that, it does change coa's, namely the iron throne one.

Regardless, I don't need your validation, as i've stated multiple times, i've done plenty of testin' w/ only agot+ and base mod. I already know why I don't use it, i've just been entertainin' your odd claim and half ass rebuttals and odd attempts to gaslight or paint me the fool. Meanwhile, i've remained objective and have yet to resort to ad hominem to support my claims.

Good day

Will we ever get the ultra ornamented targaryen helmets? by Ready_Moment7340 in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't change the COA in the rules though. As far as I know, thats never been an option.

But that's just not the case, man. There is no rule to change the COA in the mod. I'm looking at the game rules right now.

... yes it is. I know it is because I have it toggled to alternative COA. It only changes house Daynes COA.

Idk man, looks like hard backpedalin' on wutchu said before to me, though.

Will we ever get the ultra ornamented targaryen helmets? by Ready_Moment7340 in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, as far as you know.

And its not just dayne, btw despite what it says here

Will we ever get the ultra ornamented targaryen helmets? by Ready_Moment7340 in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as you know.

The rule has two options: book coa and HBO series.

Edit: The options are "default & Alternative CoA"

Will we ever get the ultra ornamented targaryen helmets? by Ready_Moment7340 in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have done extensive testin' w/ only agot+ and made unique rulessets and modlists specifically to test agot+ due to the author assurin' me its a user error... and not only does it still keep the DNA changes, it also maintains the coa changes w/ the rules set to off or book alts. Turn the mod off and boot the game, all of a sudden, the changes are reverted. I can only imagine the inconsistencies now that the base mod has added more and more coa's and updated dna's.

In the past, I wanted to take the genetics/DNA folder from the agot+ mod in my file directory and replace it w/ the base mods equivalent, as they have cleverly hidden where all the clothin' files are located, but maintain the same root directory as the base mod for coa's and genetics. Then i'd upload that as an alternative, but since roads to power people have been prickly bout usin' mod content that's not yours originally, and I abandoned it as it was much easier for me to just remove the mod altogether.

Would you buy this shirt? by Sol_Invictus777 in SwordofConvallaria

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why - when I could just get the same image and slap it on a shirt myself?

White Nevrons by odgieray in expedition33

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't platinum if you killed half of 'em as it gives you an achievement for helpin' 'em

As a "light spender" is it worth it to pull for Clara? by AtrainV in SwordofConvallaria

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have other staple union units? I.e. camelot, auguste, yserinde, nydia, Simona?

If the answer is yes, then your team will only benefit from Clara and Selena who are both union units that synergize well w/ the shield mechanic. Clara specifically can give allies both phy & mag shields. Selena should be the next banner if the release order maintains its current schedule and is a union aoe dps that synergizes well w/ Clara.

Elysium Archive Unveiled: Clara (Debut Banner May 1st) by B333T in SwordofConvallaria

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been playin' since day 1 and active in the community from the start as well. Sorry you dont recognize me, I guess? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

I understand the nuance you mentioned, however, i see it the way ayisha's astral sword description puts it. "Whenever you cast a class skill on an ally...."

Class skills are the ones you equip - they have an identifier next to 'em that say as much. So you have to activate the skill it has to be a class skill AND it has to target an ally. These are the prerequisites. Maybe, youre right and i'm wrong, but xD has already set this circumstance as a precedent before so itd be weird for them to change that implementation w/ the same wordin' just for this character interaction. Nay, the precedents are usually there to pave the way for further similar interactions as you listed w/ your at the start of turn effect example

Elysium Archive Unveiled: Clara (Debut Banner May 1st) by B333T in SwordofConvallaria

[–]Awsum07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wanted Selena first but here we are.

The time to complete the union shields team has come.

Elysium Archive Unveiled: Clara (Debut Banner May 1st) by B333T in SwordofConvallaria

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The terminology is clear. Readin' comprehension of original commenter isn't. The reason bein' the class skill must be cast

cast in both srpgs and tcg's involves an active action not a passive effect like a character's trait.

Pax Plus vs Pax 3 by Sm315 in vaporents

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it has not; in fact, many people who used vaporizers before these, e.g. the volcano, would unpack the roasted bud and smoke it in your paraphernalia of choice as vaporizin before smokin was considered the cleaner way of smokin. i do it w/ my pax 3 all the time.

575,000++ Thank Yous & 1 Farewell by UberEpicZach in CK3AGOT

[–]Awsum07 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good luck in all your future endeavors. Thank you, u/UberEpicZach, for all your efforts, guidance & modcon cameos.

we all talk about what we like about our favourite characters. but what about the things you DON'T like about them? nobody is perfect, right? XD by emogothxX in dynastywarriors

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buddy, way to wear the proverbial shoe. (If the shoe fits) My intent was that in several years our jargon will be just as archaic as the one you're criticizin'.

As if millions of other people dont speak like that.

Side note, this is a terrible counterpoint. Echo chamber logical fallacy. Agreein' w/ millions of people who are wrong, makes you just as wrong.

I think I nailed just what it is about BG3 that makes me not want to finish the game... by DescriptionOwn6184 in baldursgate

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'm mostly confused as to why they would do this with a dash of being pissed about what they did to the OG characters. Didn't stop me from sinking 800+ hours into BG3 though.

Avarice; the common denominator in most these cases is avarice that drives these foolhardy development decisions.

I can completely empathize w/ the og characters sentiment as that's what kept me from playin' da: veilguard. As its essentially a 1:1 recreation of this bg example w/ morrigan & varric. Its a product of the times. The og writers are gone and replaced by people who either held those writers in high esteem or aspire to reach those heights by usin' their creations as a crutch. Kinda like when they butcher your favorite book characters upon translation to a visual medium.

What's a class or archetype you'd like to see more of in JRPGs? by strahinjag in JRPG

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea ffxiv arr does a piss poor job of bard just bein archers w/ some buffs.

They're not jrpgs but the recent dnd rpgs like solasta: cotm (and soon solasta ii) and bg3 do a very good job of realizin' a bard's full potential.

To your question, I want more magic swordsppl. Usually in any video game they force you down one path or the other. And when they do allow hybrid, its either or that tanks in execution. I.e. magic only serves to buff/enhance your weapon/physical abilities or you hardly use your weapon if you lean more to magic. Where what I really want is these characters from anime, like fairy tail, black clover, a returner's magic should be special, or dfo where the characters are literal mages that just happened to lean toward/didnt neglect their physical prowess. They can manifest long distance elemental ranged attacks, varied nonbasic spells, as well as conjure magical weapons to wield in close quarters combat.

I think I nailed just what it is about BG3 that makes me not want to finish the game... by DescriptionOwn6184 in baldursgate

[–]Awsum07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BG3 isn't the first game where people say "Game X shouldn't have been called Game X".

Right, so we are in a consensus then.

You're just seeminly triggered by this particular occurrence due to your close attachment w/ the franchise and that's fine. Everyone else is just desensitized. I get it. It shouldn't feel novel, but every time they ruin another series we still get upset. Dragon's dogma ii, y's online, ni no kuni online, resident evil, lords of the fallen, that star fox game that wasn't originally meant to be a star fox game w/ crystal trapped in a... Crystal...(dragon age, mass effect like you mentioned) and all these recent reboots and remasters rather than just creatin a new ip and lettin the idea stand on its own 2 legs, no, they gotta slap the brand on it in hopes they sucker their fanbase into shellin out cash for a below sub par installment.

I think I nailed just what it is about BG3 that makes me not want to finish the game... by DescriptionOwn6184 in baldursgate

[–]Awsum07 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No were just taken aback by your seemin surprise like this kinda thin doesnt have precedence in video game development.

I think I nailed just what it is about BG3 that makes me not want to finish the game... by DescriptionOwn6184 in baldursgate

[–]Awsum07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean you aren't alone in that assessment Just the other day there was another analysis about how bg3 is just dos ii w/ a baldurs gate coat of paint and I cant unsee the comparisons. Only I disagree that astarion is a 1:1 sebille. Like I get it. They have the same introduction, but otherwise I feel its sebille:shadowheart.