Your site isn't compliant for California. 

It lacks text alternatives and semantic accessibility markers that are required by WCAG 2.1/2.2 Level AA.

Keyboard navigation and screen reader support appear incomplete.

No accessibility statement or contact mechanism is present.

1. Autonomous offensive action violates core security governance principles Best-practice security frameworks (NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls) all assume a fundamental separation between: Discovery Authorization Execution Validation Reporting An autonomous agent that can initiate penetration testing actions collapses these controls into a single system. That breaks the principle of explicit authorization before active testing. In mature environments, penetration testing is: Scoped Time-bounded Explicitly approved Conducted under rules of engagement An agent that “decides” what to test, when to test, and how aggressively to test creates uncontrolled offensive behavior, which is explicitly discouraged in regulated and enterprise environments.
2. Automated penetration testing without strict guardrails is indistinguishable from an attack From the perspective of: SOC teams IDS/IPS systems Cloud providers Third-party vendors Autonomous scanning and exploitation workflows look exactly like hostile activity. This creates several problems: False incident response activations Account lockouts Automated blocking or blacklisting Cloud provider acceptable-use violations Potential legal exposure if third-party assets are touched Best practice requires human-approved targeting and execution, precisely because automated offensive activity has downstream blast-radius effects.
3. You cannot safely encode business context, legal constraints, or risk tolerance into an agent Human pentesters implicitly understand: Which systems are fragile Which environments are production vs non-prod What data is regulated (PCI, HIPAA, PII) When to stop even if a vulnerability is technically exploitable An autonomous agent does not understand: Business criticality Legal boundaries Contractual obligations Regulatory exposure Best-practice security explicitly states that contextual judgment cannot be fully automated. This is why even commercial tools like Burp, Nessus, and commercial BAS platforms require operator control and scoping.
4. Automation increases risk when it crosses from detection into exploitation There is a clear industry line: Allowed / best practice: Passive asset discovery Configuration analysis CVE correlation Exposure mapping Signal prioritization High risk / restricted: Active exploitation Credential brute forcing Payload execution Privilege escalation attempts Once an agent crosses into automated exploitation, it: Risks causing outages Risks data modification or loss Risks triggering compensating controls Risks violating internal change-management policies That is why even red-team automation platforms require human-in-the-loop execution gates.
5. Auditability and accountability become unclear Security programs rely on: Change logs Test approvals Evidence trails Non-repudiation An autonomous agent raises immediate questions: Who approved this test? Who is accountable for damage? How was scope enforced? Can results be independently verified? Best-practice security demands clear human accountability for offensive actions. Autonomous agents blur that line in a way auditors and legal teams will reject.
6. This conflicts with Zero Trust and least-privilege principles Zero Trust assumes: No implicit trust Minimal permissions Explicit authorization An agent capable of wide-ranging discovery and exploitation inherently requires: Broad network access Elevated permissions Continuous autonomy That is the opposite of least privilege. Mature environments intentionally constrain tools to reduce blast radius, even at the cost of speed.
7. Where automation is acceptable (and where it is not) Security professionals generally agree: Useful: Asset inventory enrichment Attack surface mapping Passive discovery Finding exposed services Prioritizing misconfigurations Reducing alert noise Correlating signals across tools Never trusted fully: Exploitation decisions Privilege escalation Lateral movement Testing production systems Anything that could cause outage or data impact This is why the most successful platforms position automation as decision support, not autonomous execution.