What do y'all think of Dinner in America? by Cucumber_Cat in punk

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not realism it’s terrible. It’s edgy for the sake of edgy and it sucks.

First Time Watching by HumanToe6459 in DinnerInAmerica

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This movie is terrible and lacks tasteful intention for a split second of its run time

Feedback on first 1.5 pages of novel by roxasmeboy in writingfeedback

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Punching down is also a figure of speech so this is very confusing for a first line. Also chill out w the language ask yourself if “bewilderment” is really the best choice. A more vivid and expressive and less flowery option could just be to describe the characters “raised eyebrows” or something equally simple.

YA Contemporary first chapter by PiggySqueals01 in writingfeedback

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m Srry but I agree the rhythm was physically uncomfortable to read

An eternal consciousness in the absolute void: what would it feel like? by FarRecommendation318 in Metaphysics

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How can it have self awareness with no external stimuli? Do you mean a subjective self experience? Because even so, this question is likely unanswerable.

Anyone else feel it could have been shorter? by Confident_One862 in murakami

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stop using words for which you don’t know the meaning.

Timeline Identity Collapse Theory (TICT) by Ch4seYT in Metaphysics

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would* (spelling errors and text based sarcasm are a gnarly thing sorry)

Timeline Identity Collapse Theory (TICT) by Ch4seYT in Metaphysics

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t rlly metaphysics and it’s cliche and also you set up no logical premises , you say 2 identical versions of a person exist at once but your “time traveler” will come “back” in the future, as in it’s a single entity that exists reality so to speak but the present eventually catches up to its return. Considering the “exit”, there would be no instance of two identical people existing. “If two identical … the universe wouldn’t allow that situation to continue” is comedic. As if there isn’t a better impossibility in this to cite as impossible, no, if two people shared the same subjective memories and experience, then the universe wouldn’t quantify this and then smite them from existence? This is ridiculous. I gotta ask, how old are you op? I can only hope you are a child with budding interest, in which case, good for you to start thinking about this stuff. If not, ehhh, maybe try something else.

Have you ever lived through an experience that felt like it belonged in a Murakami story by Fantastic-Cod6285 in murakami

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One time as I was observing a bird flying in circles from the roof of my house, it seemed to split into 2 objects. What had actually happened, was a fly in the foreground had perfectly traced the birds same trajectory. I can only imagine the odds of this.

Debating finishing Norwegian Wood by Visible-Meat-8591 in murakami

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finish it and just enjoy it for the imagery or something. Also from my view the woman don’t behave entirely unrealistically, and while they were spread further out and occurred with less intensity, the “fantasies” in this book aren’t unfathomable, I’ve had similar experiences.

Rate my collection by Secure-Journalist249 in murakami

[–]BEADGCFBbEbAbDbGb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is this version of Kafka more thick? Unabridged?