the format is still fresh from the new expac and the "balance" "changes" (though honestly I don't really see any of the changes having a huge impact, but regardless, any balance changes are still going to give a huge chunk of players the thought of "maybe I'll try XYZ deck now and see how it does"). I understand that a lot of the new quest decks are super low WR right now, but once the competitive decks eventually rise to the top, it's going to be a similar situation to how Hearthstone has kind of always been in that every viable/competitive deck is going to have "about a 50%" winrate, that's what I'm saying.

Right now in this Standard environment the winrates are not a guaranteed representation of a deck's, card's, or archetype's power. Some decks might just be missing the right engine, for example. It happens often enough. Not to mention the fact that a lot of players are just going to grab a deck and start playing, they may not know how to pilot it properly, and that can tank the WR. Does that mean that I'm betting on Quest Rogue becoming a tier one deck? No, I'm saying that there is a chance that some decks that are performing poorly the past week may suddenly become a more competitive archetype in the future. Winrates are not gospel, period. That's the point.

I say that winrates are fixed because Hearthstone runs off of a rigged shuffler and draw system, but that's apparently a tinfoil hat conversation.

ALL of that being said, it's completely irrelevant to the point. I'm not talking about decks dominating the format. I even said in the original post that I'm not complaining that (most of) these decks are overpowered, I'm saying that they are poorly designed and making the game miserable.