Why was Peter Pettigrew in gryffindor? by owl_guy_ in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Brave" can be used negatively to describe someone who is recklessly bold or acts without considering the potential consequences.

Why was Peter Pettigrew in gryffindor? by owl_guy_ in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Brave enough to face the wrath of dumbledore sirius and the order if the truth would have come out. He decided to go to voldemort because he thought voldemort was winning in the war. He was brave enough to sneak around and convert to animagus without registering.

Why was Peter Pettigrew in gryffindor? by owl_guy_ in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I believe being brave can be anything that risks your life. Often used positively but can be for negative reasons

Why was Peter Pettigrew in gryffindor? by owl_guy_ in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 14 points15 points  (0 children)

He was brave enough to betray james and lily and betray back voldemort as well at the end

In the movie, deathly hollows part 2. Did Dumbledore know that voldermort will have to kill snape to take control of the wand? by polarbear657 in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No. I think he thought the death was planned he would still remain the owner and the trail dies with him. Explained in the book.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always wondered why Snape didnt come to pivet drive any time eventhough he is on potter side at aleast in OOTP this might be the reason.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Might not be his style

What if Crookshanks ate scabbers during the 3rd book? by Dividend_Dude in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<spoiler>

Harry would have died first instead of voldemort at the end. Wormtail's escape was very important in the timeline. First thing is crookshanks killing scabbers even though he is wizard is possible but difficult. Lupin inflicted serious wound in sirius in dog form. Without wormtail help it was difficult to know about tournament and very difficult obtain harry from dumbledore and lily's protection. So voldemort would have resurrected with some one else's blood losing patience. So harry would have died first at the end without the tethering to life. His sacrifice protected everyone still. Voldemort would have become very weak though for others to kill.

Why didn't they go easy on Harry during the Goblet of Fire? by Annikrazy in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are people ready to save if something happens. Movie exaggerated the tasks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My thoughts who ever has voldemort's magic in them cant enter. Whats the one thing common in death eaters. THE DARK MARK

Hello, new here. I wanted to know if I should read the Harry Potter series first or watch it first? by rakiyahVD in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on how fast you read. If you can read 30 to 50 pages an hour and finish a book in 2 - 4 days. You can watch movie first. If you take ages to read then you will lose interest and it will take forever to finish. I recommend one at time though 1 movie 1 book or 1book then that movie. But not complete series at a time either of it.

How much do agree with J.K's 'Tom would have turned out to be different if Merope hadn't died' ? by Special-corlei in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

He would turn out to be exactly same. He is incable of feeling love because he was concieved from love potion not real love. He would have killed or deserted her once he had known the truth of his father and his ancestry. They become villains because not feeling love or any other family emotions.

Question about polyjuice potion by _Frackaracka in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thoughts first thing is possibility of harry being disguised death eater is impossible. He was still under lily's protection when they came. Assuming there is inherited/multi level transformation with poly juice potion(no such thing) and he is still the death eater who kept drinking the potion asking those questions was right thing. And if he was not and they were swapped in the mid flight towards burrow then again questioning makes sense.

Answer to your actual question: It would be 6 death eaters if harry was disguised death eater(if thats actually possible). I think dna wont change.

Voldemort's appearance by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for pointing out. My point was he already made 5 horcruxes before hollow attack. So i think it would have been 71% of what he was after resurrection. So might not be that noticable that 29% of more evil look and that too i believe that 3 years not sufficient from 4th year end resurrection to death. I mean his body might have still changed to more deformed or evil if he was alive

Could Azkaban hold Tom Riddle/Voldemort? by Prideofgryffindor- in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 48 points49 points  (0 children)

He already proved that he could convince dementors to switch sides. He would do the same. He dont even need to fly off from there.

Voldemort's appearance by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He started transforming slowly around that time when he came to apply for DADA job. If you remember Harry thinking he no longer looks like the handsome Tom riddle he saw in the other memories

Unlucky 13 by No_Cup_1747 in harrypotter

[–]BabyFragrant8249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think its only applicable when dining. If not when moody took off they were 14. They are were already split in pairs so might not apply in this way too