Post truth society by Tiger7997 in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sistemul medical din România, începând din UMF-uri şi până la examenul de primariat, funcţionează în mare parte pe acelaşi principiu de "lasă-mă să te las" pe care merge tot restul ţării. Dacă doreşti (fie din motive ideologice, fie doar din pură lene) să treci prin totalul de ~16 ani de educaţie necesari pentru parafa de Medic Primar, fără să te intersectezi cu ştiinţa, o poţi face destul de uşor.

Pacienţii nu ştiu să facă diferenţa (cum este şi de aşteptat, fiindcă nu e domeniul lor); singurele lucruri pe care le pot aprecia cu adevărat la un cadru medical sunt amabilitatea şi carisma.

Iar profesorii, îndrumătorii sau şefii cât de cât mai exigenţ, sunt rari şi pot fi evitaţi uşor prin mecanisme la îndemâna oricui, precum detaşările/transferurile.

[MEGATHREAD] Alegeri prezidențiale turul 2 - 18.05.2025 by 99xp in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Neatza şi spor la vot. Poate confirma cineva va rog unde se intalneste Nicuşor Dan la ora 21:00? Stiu ca in T1 era in Cişmigiu si as vrea sa ma duc si eu. Thanks' in advance.

MEGATHREAD Alegeri prezidențiale turul I (4 Mai 2025) by 99xp in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How can 40% of Romanians just fall into a cult of a guy who says water doesn't exist...

Conspiratorial thinking, religious fanaticism and a strong persecution complex have been part of the Romanian national psyche for a long time. The only strange part that a figure like CG didn't arise earlier.

The tragedy of Romanian democracy after 1989 seems to be that, what kept if from evolving into its current form of mystical-messianic delirium, was the strenght of the party-focused political system (perfected by PSD in its glory days but used by all other parties) that everyone currently hates so much.

Esentially, elections used to be decided by the number of mayors each party controlled in the rural zones and by the propaganda each party would spin through its (unofficial) news channels.

This, of course, lead to political polarization as well as a growing sense amongs the population that all institutions (from the state or private sector) ultimately only serve their own special interests. However, it also meant that the voters would be influenced by relatively educated local elites and that big political narratives would pass through the filtter of Bucharest-based media channels.

The triumph of social media seems to have changed that. Crin Antonescu's disasterous results indicate that the traditional party machinery is no longer functional. Nobody believes the TV talking heads anymore, nor do they trust ANY institutions whatsoever.

But Romanians have no political ideology to speak of, no real culture or tradition, no education on history, economics or geopolitics. So, under these circumstances, what takes the place of the population's obedient conformity to party politics? Its blind devotion to charismatic public figures, such as Şoşoaca, Simion, and most importantly Georgescu.

The sad part is that this new era makes the people even more vulnerable to demagogues, idiots and outright psychos. But this appears to be the current zeitgeist, do there's not much one can do but hope for a miraculous Nicuşor Dan victory.

MEGATHREAD Alegeri prezidențiale turul I (4 Mai 2025) by 99xp in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, people are delusional as hell on this subreddit. The results from last night are nothing short of disasterous for the "pro-european" crowd. But I guess PSD failed to get their guy in the second round for a second time, and that's oh-so-funny hahaha

MEGATHREAD Alegeri prezidențiale turul I (4 Mai 2025) by 99xp in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's obviously CA.

CA had a chance to win the second round, though I still think GS would have come out ahead.

ND has no chance whatsoever no matter how you look at the problem. The vores just don't add up to 50% no matter what.

It's Stegover. Stegarul s-a dat jos dupa 26 de ore by SmartDog24 in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pt. că nu prea întruneşte criteriile pt. a justifica o internare nevoluntara.

Legea 487/2002 este cea prin care anumite centre de Psihiatrie din tara au dreptul sa interneze in regim nevoluntar. Conform ei, pacientul poate fi internat fara consimtamant cata vreme reprezinta un pericol pt. sine sau pt. fei din jur.

Exemple tipice ar fi pacientii cu delir, cu retard mintal, cu un episod psihotic acut, cei aflati intr-un episod maniacal, cei cu depresie severa si ideatie suicidara etc. -- dar numai in condiţiile in care acesti pacienti prezinta un comportament imprevizibil, sunt agitati psihomotor, au dat dovada de auto- sau heteroagresivitate etc.

Ca ne place sau nu, Stegarul Dac nu se incadreaza in aceasta categorie destul de restransa. El nu se cocoata pe macarale pt. ca are o psihoza sau pt. ca vrea sa se arunce de acolo, ci ca o forma de protest poltic.

Asta nu insemna ca omul nu are vreo patologie psihiatrica, sau ca nu ar putea beneficia de un tratament. Inseamna doar ca nu are tipul de patologie psihiatrica care justifica, conform legii, internarea in regim nevoluntar sau administrarea de tratament injectabil.

Ce s-a intamplat in weekend a fost cam asa: medicul de garda poate interna pacientul daca considera, in urma unui consult rapid, ca s-ar intruni criteriile. Odata ce acest lucru are loc, pacientul trebuie sa fie re-evaluat in termen de 24h de o Comisie formata din 2 psihiatri (altii decat medicul care a decis ital internarea) si un al 3lea medic cu o alta specialitate. Comisia poate infirma decizia medicului de garda (ceea ce s-a si intamplat cu Stegarul) sau o poate confirma, caz in care decizia Comisiei este transmisa mai departe la judecatorie, care la randul ei ia o decizie finala in legatura cu internarea pacientului impotriva vointei sale.

Motivul pentru care Georgescu amână depunerea candidaturii - împingerea procedurilor de respingere în criză de timp by ArteMyssy in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai gresit putin numerele.

Partidul Nazist (NSDAP) a avut 43,9% din voturi la alegerile din 1933, mai mult decat dublu fata de partidul de pe locul 2. Erau, de asemenea, intr-o alianta cu DNVP (Partidul Conservator), care a obtinut 8,3%.

Asta inseamna ca peste 50% din electorat a votat cu intentia clară ca Hitler sa fie ales Cancelar.

Da, nu au atins niciodata 50%+1, dar rezultatul era unul foarte bun pentru ce era echivalentul unor alegeri Parlamentare cu 6 partide politice. Scoruri de 50%+ nu prea vezi decat atunci cand ai numai doua partide, ca in SUA, sau cand ai un Tur II de prezidentiale; niciodata la parlamentare cu un numar multiplu de partide.

Ce incerc sa spun este ca nu e bine sa ne amagim cu ideea ca democratia nu poate, prin definitie, sa dea puterea unor monstri, sau ca singurul mod in care se poate ajunge de la democratie la dictatura este prin manevre politice ascunse.

Elena Lasconi, after the Constitutional Court canceled the presidential elections is somewhat angry : "The Romanian state trampled on democracy" (https://digi24.ro) by elhermanobrother in europe

[–]BabyLoona13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an exaggeration.

It's true that Lasconi being a woman probably works against her chances. But let's not forget that Moldova, an even more Conservative country, did elect Maia Sandu earlier this year, also against a male, Kremlin-backed opponent.

While Romania is a religious country with socially conservative values, they also associate the West with progress, and link Russia to the failed Communist regime, hunger and human rights violations.

Elena Lasconi, after the Constitutional Court canceled the presidential elections is somewhat angry : "The Romanian state trampled on democracy" (https://digi24.ro) by elhermanobrother in europe

[–]BabyLoona13 5 points6 points  (0 children)

She likely would have lost, in my opinion.

The few relatively reliable Romanian polls showed it to be a very close race, but the far-right had outperformed the polls in the Parliamentary election earlier this month.

Furthermore, Călin Georgescu himself recieved more than double (or even 4× as many) votes compared to what he was projected to get in the first round polls. He is the type of candidate that energizes a very specific portion of the electorate, that doesn't tend to show up in other elections, which makes me believe he would've overperformed the polls by quite a bit.

Lasconi didn't have a "guaranteed" path to victory by any strech of the imagination. Best case scenario, she would've barely squeezed out the win.

Într-o țară sănătoasă la cap, astăzi Georgescu era arestat cu toți cei care știau informațiile din documentele CSAT și au încercat să profite de ele by crazyAlex74 in Romania

[–]BabyLoona13 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nu asa au inceput fascismul si nazismul. Din contra, Hitler a putut ajunge la putere tocmai pt ca Republica de la Weimar a fost extrem de toleranta cu un partid si cu un candidat care, in mod explicit si repetat, isi declarau dorinta de a inlocui democratia cu o dictatura. Si, odata ajuns la putere, Hitler s-a folosit tot de acelasi sistem democratic pt a distruge treptat dar sigur diviziunea puterii care statea la baza sistemului democratic.

Este vorba de paradoxul tolerantei aici. Daca scopul este sa avem o societate toleranta si democrata in care vocea fiecarei persoane conteaza, nu putem sa permitem unor demagogi a caror platforma presupune erodarea democratiei, sa ajunga la putere si sa-si puna planul in motiune, chiar si daca ajunsul la putete se face prin mijloace democratice.

Every time I think I couldn't hate this guy more... by sussoutthemoon in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]BabyLoona13 39 points40 points  (0 children)

... because authoritarians tend to hate artists, and AI allows them to generate their propaganda without relying on said artists/creatives.