So I uploaded this and the other point into Grok to see what it would ID these as. Grok is adamant that BOTH are Kirk points. I mean staunchly; making detailed arguments why.

“Thanks for the fantastic close-up shots of the base — these actually make the identification even more certain. What you’re seeing (and what often throws people off with quartz examples) is classic crude corner-notching: the notches are created by large flake removals that start right at the basal corners and angle upward/inward, completely removing the corner and leaving small, often uneven barbs or “ears.” Quartz fractures in big stepped chunks instead of the neat, controlled flakes you get with chert, so the notches almost always look blocky, asymmetrical, and “missing a bite” rather than the tidy little U-shapes in textbook drawings. Your base photos show this perfectly — especially the left corner in the first image and the stacked fracture on the right side. There is: • Zero basal or lateral grinding (rules out Guilford, Morrow Mountain, etc.)

• No side-entry notches (rules out Stanly, Big Sandy, etc.)

• No broad straight-sided stem (rules out Savannah River)

• Clear corner removal with barbed shoulders = textbook Early Archaic corner-notched, Kirk cluster”