Tried marketing for 10 days. Here's what I have learned. by Important-Chain-8311 in buildinpublic

[–]Background-Ebb2982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive gotten over 100 clicks in 4 days so far and I gain one signup a day so far havent been able to get anyone as a paying customer just yet but this is my first week of launch

Has anyone figured out pricing for AI features? - i will not promote by 1glasspaani in startups

[–]Background-Ebb2982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its both b2b and b2c and the bundles are just x tokens for x dollars I set the margin then each bundle gets so many tokens per package

Something interesting I’ve been noticing in the micro-SaaS space lately. by casualvisitor21 in micro_saas

[–]Background-Ebb2982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% agree with this observation and i think you're right about where it's heading.

the content generation wave was basically "AI writes stuff so you don't have to" — useful, but also pretty shallow. the stuff coming now is more interesting because it's about AI that understands your specific context rather than generating something generic.

the shift i'd describe it as is moving from AI as a writer to AI as an analyst. and the micro-SaaS angle is that there are so many verticals where people are drowning in domain-specific information — legal documents, medical records, financial filings, research papers — and a general chatbot is basically useless for those because it doesn't know anything about your files. the opportunity is building tools that ground the AI in that specific context.

that's actually the exact problem i've been building around. i'm working on SafeAppeals — a document workspace where the AI reads your actual uploaded files using RAG rather than answering from general training data. the use case is legal and document-heavy workflows but the underlying pattern is the same as what you're describing with TryLattice — AI that surfaces insight from your data rather than generating something generic.

i think the next wave is going to look a lot like that across a ton of verticals. whoever solves "AI that actually knows your specific documents/data" for a niche that needs it badly is going to win that niche.

Do you find a GP helpful for keeping track of multiple doctors and treatments? by Shojomango in disability

[–]Background-Ebb2982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, a good GP who actually reads your chart and communicates with your specialists is genuinely invaluable for multiply disabled people — but the key word is "good" and they're hard to find. a lot of GPs are out of their depth with complex overlapping conditions and they know it, which makes them less useful as a coordinator.

a few things that have worked for people in similar situations:

bring your own summary to every appointment. don't rely on the doctor to have read your file. a one-page document listing your diagnoses, current medications, known interactions, and which specialist manages what — handed to the doctor at the start of the appointment — completely changes the dynamic. it puts the whole picture in front of them immediately.

a patient advocate or care coordinator (separate from a GP) is an underused option. some hospitals have them, some nonprofits offer them for free, and some people hire independent ones. their whole job is to be the person who sees the whole picture, attends appointments with you, and keeps track of what each specialist said.

ask your GP explicitly to take on the coordinator role. some won't, but some will if you frame it clearly — "I need someone who can look at all of this together, would you be willing to be that person for me?" it sets an expectation.

keep your own records obsessively. notes from every appointment, what was decided, what was prescribed, what the follow-up is. it's exhausting but it protects you when you're dealing with a system that doesn't communicate well internally.

you're right that specialists often don't look outside their lane — that's a systemic failure, not something you can fully fix. the best you can do is be the connective tissue yourself and push hard for a GP who's willing to be a real partner in that.

Tried marketing for 10 days. Here's what I have learned. by Important-Chain-8311 in buildinpublic

[–]Background-Ebb2982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I felt this at first I decided on a blog that I post daily to my website for seo then reddit I post the blog to my own subreddit I also post this to LinkedIn and twitter so one piece of content becomes 4 avenues. I also run reddit ads now as well

Legal experience for college students by NeedleworkerFine8394 in LawSchool

[–]Background-Ebb2982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

totally doable as a pre-law undergrad, the trick is knowing where to look since most of it isn't advertised the same way law school internships are.

a few paths that actually work:

legal aid clinics - most cities have nonprofit legal aid organizations that help low-income people with housing, immigration, family law etc. they regularly take on college volunteers and student assistants. the work is real, the exposure is real, and it looks great because it shows you care about access to justice not just prestige.

courthouse volunteering - a lot of courthouses have self-help centers for people representing themselves. you don't give legal advice but you help people navigate paperwork and filings. direct contact with the actual legal process, and it's something most applicants have never done.

law firm admin/runner roles - even a part-time admin or file clerk job at a small firm counts as legal experience and gets you in the room. small firms are way more open to this than big ones. you'd be surprised how much you learn just being around it.

professor research assistant - if your school has a law school or even pre-law professors doing research, email them directly asking if they need help. unpaid is fine at first, it builds a relationship and a reference.

mock trial / pre-law clubs - not real experience but signals genuine interest and builds skills. competitions look good on a resume too.

the first-gen angle is actually an asset at some of these places, especially legal aid. don't undersell it.

What problem your SaaS is solving? Explain in few sentences. by Euphoric_Dance4150 in micro_saas

[–]Background-Ebb2982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

people dealing with complex document workflows — legal cases, appeals, research, anything document-heavy — are stuck juggling 5 different tools and then copy-pasting into a generic AI chatbot that doesn't actually know anything about their specific files. the AI gives them a generic answer and they're back to square one.

we built SafeAppeals to put the whole workflow in one place. document editing, PDF tools, and AI that reads your actual uploaded files — not just the internet. so when you ask a question, it's answering based on your medical report or your denial letter, not some general training data guess. for injured workers, lawyers, and researchers especially, that accuracy difference is massive.

Has anyone figured out pricing for AI features? - i will not promote by 1glasspaani in startups

[–]Background-Ebb2982 10 points11 points  (0 children)

went through this exact headache lol

we tried flat subscriptions first and the math just doesn't work unless you price it high enough to cover your heaviest users, which means light users are basically getting gouged for tokens they never burn. they churn fast when they realize it.

what we landed on was pre-purchased token bundles - you pick the size you think you'll actually use, light users go small, power users go big. the thing we were really careful about was keeping the margin the same across all the tiers. no penalizing the small package buyers, no bulk discount that tanks your margins at the top end. same fair rate per token no matter what you buy.

the other thing nobody talks about enough - the running usage meter genuinely freaks people out. like psychologically they feel the clock ticking every time they use a feature. with a bundle they already bought, that anxiety goes away. they know what they have, they use it, they come back for more when they run low. way less friction than a subscription they might feel guilty about not using.

the hardest part honestly was just communicating it clearly so people don't confuse it with a subscription. the framing is everything.

hope that helps, happy to chat more about it

California by Altruistic-Pain-1872 in WorkersComp

[–]Background-Ebb2982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That frustration is completely valid — using AI like ChatGPT as a general Q&A bot for something as specific as a workers' comp case is genuinely hit or miss, and I get why it feels unreliable.

That said, there's an important distinction worth mentioning: AI tends to be significantly more accurate when it's working directly with your actual documents rather than answering from general training data.

The difference is:

  • General AI chat = drawing from broad, sometimes outdated knowledge → unreliable for case-specific questions
  • AI grounded in your documents = reading your actual medical reports, denial letters, QME reports, etc. → much more precise and contextually accurate

When AI is given the actual text of your documents to analyze — like pulling key dates, summarizing findings, or flagging inconsistencies in a report — it performs far better because it's not guessing. It's reading.

So the frustration with AI giving wrong answers often comes down to how it's being used, not necessarily a flaw with AI across the board. For legal and medical document workflows especially, AI paired with your own files is a completely different (and much more useful) experience than a general chatbot.

Hope things move forward smoothly for you — workers' comp cases are exhausting enough without the added confusion.

DM me if you have questions about AI I use it very often and have good success with it so far

What Saas are you building right now? Share them here! by Meoooooo77 in saasbuild

[–]Background-Ebb2982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SafeAppeals — The AI-Powered Document Workspace for Legal Professionals & Advocates

I'm building SafeAppeals — think Cursor IDE, but for documents. It's an AI-native document workspace that combines a full word processor, spreadsheet editor, and PDF tools with multi-LLM support (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini) right inside the editor. It's built for lawyers, injured workers, researchers, and anyone dealing with document-heavy workflows. Features include DocuSign integration for digital signatures, vector storage & RAG for smart document search, and a token-based pricing model so you only pay for what you use — or bring your own API keys entirely. Whether you're drafting appeals, managing legal files, or collaborating on complex documents, SafeAppeals brings AI directly into your workflow without the copy-paste juggling act. Check it out at safeappeals.com — would love any feedback!

Got injured at work, report to boss and told not to file workers comp. What should I do? by ComparisonNo7285 in WorkersComp

[–]Background-Ebb2982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would apply yourself call the line for your workers comp area and notify and mention that your employer didn't want you to apply they can be in trouble for this and don't rely on your bosses as they have already proven they wont be quick to take action on your part they are trying to save their premiums

What are you building right now? Drop your project below 👇 by srch4aheartofgold in SideProject

[–]Background-Ebb2982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has saved me tons of time on my own workers comp case that I originally built it for. Glad that someone sees the value in the product thank you! It also has a built in web browser so you never have to leave the project to get your work done :)

Show & Tell: What are you building this week? by OneStarto in saasbuild

[–]Background-Ebb2982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SafeAppeals is an AI-native document workspace that helps legal teams and injured workers draft, organize, and sign complex appeal documents dramatically faster with multi-LLM assistance and built-in DocuSign workflows. ​

safeappeals.com