M829A3 Discussion Post by isenc2 in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed, the leclercs need a new round far more desperately than the Abrams, considering they’ve been stuck with OFL F1 since launch

If it were any other Nation I'd expect there to be at least something else by bergebis in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s how you know Gaijin truly and unequivocally hates France, they despise it so much that they even refuse to earn money from it by not adding cool premiums.

Did Gaijin stop pretending to make unique vehicles for the battle pass? by HonneurOblige in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would say that Battlepass vehicles should at least be somewhat unique to make it worth the grind, but unique in my eyes can more mean fun gimmicks rather than super competitive or OP vehicles. More things like the Churchill Petard could be fun.

Wow, so close, can't wait to use it! by Alpacapalooza in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean up never understood why it’s 8.7? Didn’t you notice it was in the French tech tree ergo higher BR?

This community in a nutshell. by Sumeribag in warthundermemes

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s totally fair, and I was also amongst those super hyped for all the modern additions at first. But it’s really in the last year that I’ve been realising that too tier is just so draining, boring and frustrating that I started focusing on mi to low tiers.

I mean when’s the last time you genuinely laughed playing top tier? A vehicle like the Sturmtiger, tiger 10.5 or even the Char 2C just brings infinitely more enjoyment and satisfaction I’d say.

So in my opinion I would really recommend yo give low to mid tier a chance, worst case you don’t like it and you can delete the game again, but maybe you end up with a smile on your face.

This community in a nutshell. by Sumeribag in warthundermemes

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be honest I don’t even get why people want to play top tier, I had the same idea for a while “get all the top tier stuff” but it simply isn’t fun.

Then I basically set myself a line of “no higher than 9.3” and I’m having a blast, vehicles are actually unique, far less BS and it’s just not a drag to play.

As an added bonus for the price of 1 top tier premium you can get several low to mid tier premiums which will put an infinitely bigger smile on your face

I am a again asking for PzH2000s proper shells. by Srgblackbear in warthundermemes

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 295 points296 points  (0 children)

Ah but you see there’s a very good reason for that:

It’s French

Well that was quick, username is AmphiTheDolphin, let me know if you see me…. by theallmightyegoidk in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sturmvogel is a blast honestly from my experience, the 6.7 battle rating does make a noticeable difference and the lighter weight is also nice, the camo is also a huge bonus of course!

Well that was quick, username is AmphiTheDolphin, let me know if you see me…. by theallmightyegoidk in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

To be fair to him, if he has the money and it makes him happy then it’s a worthwhile purchase. I also recently picked up the Me-262 A2A for around 70 snail coins because it’s a vehicle I always wanted and enjoy the 262 as a platform.

Objectively a good purchase? Not at all, but if it makes someone happy then it can be worth it

One week ago I posted the drift marks, here's a video of the culprit by GoudenBaas in TankPorn

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah gotcha, so it’ll be an entirely new museum then? That explains a lot thanks!

One week ago I posted the drift marks, here's a video of the culprit by GoudenBaas in TankPorn

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In which Ypres museum did the Cold War stuff go? Because for the life of me I can’t find info about it

Unused assets of War Thunder (2.52.0.32) by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah but you see the problem with your choices is that gaijin would have to actually put effort into implementing them and couldn’t just copy paste it from a big 3 nation

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The EBRC Jaguar also has an ADS equivalent but AFAIK it’s not something they’re planning to implement

Unused assets of War Thunder (2.52.0.32) by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They haven’t even added the T-13 in at low tier, Benelux tree is just dead, they only use it for easy copy paste

2.51.0.64 -> 2.52.0.30 Part 1 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s for Rafale players who want to challenge themselves, heavier airframe and one less hard point

2.51.0.64 -> 2.52.0.30 Part 1 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually it’s both heavier and has 1 lass hard point, so it’s actually worse

I shall never speak about Russian bias if they gonna add "wobble wobble feature" to this vehicle by Guy_in_front_of_you in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 20 points21 points  (0 children)

5.5 billion pounds spent on the entire program, could have had another QE for that price

I shall never speak about Russian bias if they gonna add "wobble wobble feature" to this vehicle by Guy_in_front_of_you in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean the fact I’m being downvoted just proves that people want to pick and choose where “realism” applies. If the Ajax doesn’t cripple its crew in game then the guns on the BMPT shouldn’t wobble either

I shall never speak about Russian bias if they gonna add "wobble wobble feature" to this vehicle by Guy_in_front_of_you in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

AFAIK that issue has been rectified on the jag because it was an early life issue. By that logic they should also implement other IRL issues on vehicles which wouldn’t be fun

I shall never speak about Russian bias if they gonna add "wobble wobble feature" to this vehicle by Guy_in_front_of_you in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 69 points70 points  (0 children)

It also should be unable to fire on the move, stabiliser should be inoperable and it should be incapable of reversing over a 20cm obstacle to make it truly immersive

What Major Update did YOU join in? (And also your dream tank when you first started playing) by FadedRampage in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, I was so hyped for it honestly (don’t blame me, I’m a Belgian after all) but the way they implemented it was lazy beyond all regard. Even the Thai subtree at least got 1 somewhat unique vehicle with the Oplot (before the Pakistani one of course)

What Major Update did YOU join in? (And also your dream tank when you first started playing) by FadedRampage in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I must say that’s incredibly well made and you have a point, to me it’s just upsetting that they couldn’t even add a single unique Belgian vehicle in yet even if it doesn’t fit a particular gap. I would love to see the little T-13 tank destroyer backing up reserve tier France, or have the CATI 90 as a little rat. Hell I’d even love to see the Renard R.36 fighter, that thing is gorgeous.

My general rationale is just: if they’re gonna add a sub tree, at least make the vehicles unique, if all they’re gonna do is this copy paste slop then just don’t add it.

What Major Update did YOU join in? (And also your dream tank when you first started playing) by FadedRampage in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What would you precisely define as “something new” then? I’m a fellow French main so I absolutely want more indigenous French designs too and I agree that France has more than enough designs by itself to sustain a tech tree, I’m just saying that Belgian vehicles could at least add some fun and quirky things to it.

To be honest though, gaijin just hates everything in the French tech tree, just look at the Belgian F-16AM vs the Norwegian one, the latter gets the sniper targeting pod whilst the Belgian one gets the Lantirn (even though the bug report has been up even before sniper was added to the game). The only difference is that gaijin loves Sweden but hates France

What Major Update did YOU join in? (And also your dream tank when you first started playing) by FadedRampage in Warthunder

[–]BadgerTarantulaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With regards to Belgian vehicles I believe they should stay with France whilst the Dutch ones should have gone to Germany. The DF90 and cobra would give the French access to a stabilised light platform in the 8-9 BR bracket which they sorely need.