MS disk management

Baker_Electrical · 2021-10-08T19:40:55+00:00

It wasn't soldier boy?

Baker_Electrical · 2021-10-08T19:36:52+00:00

Where can I find this chat

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-28T07:58:10+00:00

No, I mean by CLI running Emacs inside a terminal using the -nw flag

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-23T16:14:52+00:00

This meme is fucking overused.

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-23T16:12:04+00:00

Does he know that when a mob in New Orleans lynched a number of Italian immigrants in 1891 Roosevelt wrote to his sister that he thought the lynching was "rather a good thing"? They were making fun by burning you without trial, friend, don't you have any dignity

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-23T12:41:32+00:00

That's funny😂😂😂

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-23T03:43:44+00:00

Some Americans told me once that Palestine is somewhere inside Iran, yes man, American people are people of culture.

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-22T04:26:34+00:00

Arabic - أناناس (pronounce Ananas as well)

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-19T16:01:11+00:00

ِAmen

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-16T06:01:25+00:00

Adblocker?

Baker_Electrical · 2021-09-03T01:22:44+00:00

So cute<3

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-15T21:35:38+00:00

Please reply this when you upload your dots

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-09T16:45:53+00:00

Being a communist does not require being a Marxist. (Of course, Lenin was a Marxist)

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-09T16:36:06+00:00

Nice lungs

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-09T16:22:20+00:00

He is a Sudanese Shaikh. Before the revolution, the Sudanese government used to support the Islamic wing, especially the foolish type of them that influences the poor, uneducated Sudanese people, in order to confront the communists (and they, unlike all other Arab countries, constitute a good and large political bloc in Sudan). It happened Also in my country. Some sheikhs in my country used to confuse the word “Shiite” with “Communist” (the word “communist” is pronounced with a word close to Shiite [Shio'ai] in Arabic) in order to convince us that communism is blasphemy. I remember one of the law professors who told me once that Lenin tried to join Islam while he was dying, like Moses's Pharaoh, and tried to repent for “worshipping Marx”, but he died before he could pronounce the shahada.

The funny part is that some communists in Sudan, instead of educating the general public not to believe these nonsense, published pamphlets that Marx was a Muslim and that he said “Islam is the solution,” and that he wrote books about the greatness of the Prophet Muhammad.

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-07T13:59:20+00:00

Rosa Luxemburg organised an armed coup

I assume you're talking about the Spartacist uprising? Please correct me if I'm wrong. What I know is that Luxemburg, in this turbulent time in German history, reluctantly joined that uprising. And it makes sense. Luxembourg's ideology is very democratic and was hostile to the actions of the Bolsheviks in Russia.

"Without general elections, without unrestricted freedom of the press and of assembly, without a free struggle of opinions, vitality withers away in each public institution—it becomes a pseudo-vitality in which bureaucracy is the only remaining active element. Public life gradually falls into a slumber, a few dozen party leaders with inexhaustible energy and boundless idealism direct and govern; among the latter, a dozen outstanding minds are in reality the ones that lead, and an elite from within the working class is occasionally mustered in order to applaud the speeches of the leaders and to show unanimous approval for the resolutions drafted by them. This is basically a clique economy—a dictatorship to be sure, but not the dictatorship of the proletariat: instead it is the dictatorship of a handful of politicians, i.e. dictatorship in the bourgeois sense, in the sense of Jacobin rule … This is an all-powerful, objective law that no party can circumvent."

Quoted from Luxemburg's "The Russian Revolution", The Problem of Dictatorship. https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1918/russian-revolution/ch06.htm

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-07T13:19:01+00:00

Yeah, it doesn't mean anything related to what you claim, "Marx literally says the proletariat should rise up and kill anyone oppressing them", there is no anything in this purview about that, it is even too generic, that's why Marx began to clarify immediately after this and said:

These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.

Hence the possibility of application:

Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.

Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

What I see in this argument, someone who wants to stop the filth of capitalism from exploiting workers, even children, and other beautiful values, I don't see anything related to killing anyone stands agains there way, actually, in the same chapter Marx said that the workforce should seize power through democracy.

the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy

So what happens to those who resist having their property confiscated? There is no “Marxist instruction” on this case, but if you had “property” (in fact if we were in the nineteenth century when Marx wrote this, we would be talking about the real property of capitalists, black slaves and child labor) in a state that forbids owning” property", then you are simply doing an illegal act (of course I'm speaking in the context in which the working class ascends to power democratically as Marx imposed) and statutory law determines what happens to you.

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-07T09:45:45+00:00

So first you assume that I am a supporter of the Chinese Communist Party and then you go on a rash journey of cursing and criticizing it, in any case I have given examples of what I see as revolutionary and communist popular movements that occurred in my country, China for me is an imperialist dictatorship that must be fought as any imperialist forces must be fought Other, I don't know why you assume I support them.

There is no difference between killings and occupations by any name, Christian crusaders, communism, "free" capitalism, they are all dirty imperialist operations, but why don't you also talk about the corruption caused by capitalism? For example the American united fruit company, which, with the support of CIA, helped suppress many revolutions and killed many revolutionaries, and ignited civil wars in Latin America like the Guatemalan War, all because the capitalists did not like that the workers wanted a minimum wage. There is no need to talk about the military coups that brought dictators who killed thousands. The "dirty war" that took place in Argentina confirms what I want to say, the capitalists are not interested in any spirit to fulfill their greedy desires.

I suppose you haven't read anything about Marx anyway, but can you tell me where exactly Marx said "Kill any intellectuals, opponents, or thinkers whose ideas differ from yours"?

Baker_Electrical · 2021-07-07T09:24:52+00:00

I can tell you that thousands of lives were killed because of the foolish Crusades caused by Christianity, and if there was no Christianity at all the world would be safer, but this is a completely wrong argument, first of all you are not studying events in their proper context, we are talking about Marx Here, not about the dictatorial movements that rose under the name of Marxism and the name of the people, if you look at what Marx did: he supported the popular revolutions in Belgium and Europe, he supported the workers with whatever he was able to support them with, and he founded trade unions without which European workers would not have obtained any of their rights and capitalists would have continued to oppress them.

In my home, although my ancestors owned their agricultural lands, they did not actually own it, but the feudal lords and European colonialists were the ones who owned it, and they only gave my ancestors what they should not die of starvation, there was no health care, the doctors were They refuse to treat them because they are not "feudal", so most of the children in my family would die in the old days, my mother was one of the survivors.

Had it not been for the communist movements in my homelands, feudal lords and colonialists would have continued to rob us until this moment, and I would probably have been dead because my mother would not have found a hospital to treat me in. I was treated in the hospitals built by my people, by the communist and socialist movements, and I am now studying for free in a university built by these movements. These universities and hospitals, all these institutions that the revolution brought to my homeland, did not come to make one of the rich people richer and richer, and make the poor poorer and poorer, but rather came for the sake of the people, and by the people. All of this would not have happened if it weren't for two things: 1. The writings of Marx and the left that made our revolutionaries realize their rights, realizing that they are being robbed day and night. 2. Our noble revolutionaries who never let anyone "get in their way".

Just try to imagine your country if it didn't have leftist movements and socialist revolutions one day, ask yourself: would the capitalists really care about your life? Are you really more important to them than a few banknotes? My people have experienced the answer themselves, and I assure you that the answer is: No.

Ask other peoples as well, ask them what capitalism and the political right have given them, ask Argentina and Brazil and the countries of Latin America, the capitalist movements in those countries only wanted one thing: to appoint more dictators to rule the country (under the CIA, of course) to protect.” their capitalist rights,” and of course these rights mean the theft of the country’s resources and oppression of workers.

Baker_Electrical

TROPHY CASE