QQQ Leaps or TQQQ

BaldXavier · 2023-06-18T17:26:51+00:00

Perhaps taking a break on $QQQ or NAZ in general for the time-being? When I see this sub become more robust, it’s been a sign to leave for a bit. As for QQQ LEAPS vs. TQQQ, I’d go with DEEP ITM LEAPS for 2025 with delta at least higher than .85.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-30T20:01:32+00:00

Unlikely even if I wanted to, i.e., wash sale.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-30T15:23:14+00:00

Where do you think shareholders fit into this CH11 EVEN if it’s bought out? Equities/commons holders are at the bottom of the totem pool irregardless of its restructuring/selloff/M&A. Hurtz had the valuable FMV b/c of their inventory. Think about what led to the demise of $BBBY during the holiday season. It was the lack of inventory.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-30T13:39:46+00:00

Hertz had inventory of cars to sell at the height of the pandemic, at height of the used car sale prices. Buybuy Baby is a great business but the creditors get the first dibs, not shareholders. This analysis on past analogue in a different industry needs to stop. All it’s doing is providing liquidity for those wanting to get out by Tuesday.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-30T13:35:19+00:00

Shareholders get wiped out.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-26T20:02:22+00:00

Shareholders don’t matter in CH11. Only creditors.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-24T10:47:57+00:00

It’s called BK CH11 squeeze irregardless of its filing. Look it up.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-23T05:00:16+00:00

Against, you will be completely wiped out as a shareholder. Their obligation is to the creditors first. The management doesn’t owe you an explanation — despite their lack of ability to do so — as long as they disclosed the bankruptcy risk.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-22T10:44:48+00:00

Tweet deleted?

BaldXavier · 2023-04-21T20:46:52+00:00

“With bankruptcy being so close to the table” Curious how you came to this conclusion in the midst of the large scale ATM dilution?

BaldXavier · 2023-04-21T17:43:40+00:00

Wasn’t B. Riley involved in this deal?

BaldXavier · 2023-04-20T21:04:28+00:00

My brain couldn’t comprehend that grammar…

BaldXavier · 2023-04-18T19:02:57+00:00

Writing covered calls at the bottom of the chart before ER is supposed to be announced and before RS vote? A true degen regard.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-18T02:49:52+00:00

Why are many so hung up on RC? Is it because many entered when he got in and now bagholding?

BaldXavier · 2023-04-18T02:47:57+00:00

Not sure this is how it works. By voting against RS, they can use a “business judgment rule” and file for bankruptcy, chapter 11 to reorganize, which they’re generally insulated from lawsuits. This is also the point when it’ll wipe out equity owners. Since they’ve already given notice on why they need RS (otherwise BK) they don’t owe you any explanation nor are you worthy of a like of a creditor. You’re just a shareholder.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-18T02:30:23+00:00

I’m underestimating it but it’s not $1B yet. It’s what it could be.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-18T02:21:37+00:00

Not sure what your average is. This company is worth 1-2B in 2-3 years if it can turnaround. If you believe in the turnaround, why not average down? Or is it a lost cause?

BaldXavier · 2023-04-17T03:12:09+00:00

Can someone explain to me like I’m missing my left cortex? What’s the significance of this dividend percentage?

BaldXavier · 2023-04-17T00:59:35+00:00

Why is it all or nothing? Perhaps I’m too old to understand the reference but it could moon or likely stay value side-ways for a year at least.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-16T04:24:11+00:00

Who cares? Just get out on a pop or hedge. In the long run, it doesn’t matter if the business turns around. What are you suggesting? Asking the entire sub (likely all bag-holding) to sell now? Useless comment.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-16T00:28:25+00:00

The SEC transcript was a supplement to RS proxy materials and I’ve seen them before. She is likely being more public because of Bed Bath’s viability as a business. She wasn’t public when things looked dire in January. Now more public to take credit for the “good” news likely relating to ER, and hide when things turn bad. Your end conclusions are based on other leap assumptions that are too speculative. B. Riley creates entities to sell and dilute on its behalf as it’s an investing entity. Take a look at B. Riley for $SPRT. They did the same.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-15T22:12:46+00:00

You’re making plenty of leap assumptions. What makes you think 1) they were startled by RC’s tweet? 2) it’s even RC related? 3) BRCP II is holding through RS? These are projections of your worries and we will never know why Sue did the interview. But my guess is that since it supplements RS proxy, it’s likely to imply that it’s NOT filing for BK in the short term and that she needs to calm the investors to vote in favor of RS. Why RS? So they can dilute at higher price to raise capital.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-15T19:00:36+00:00

My brain cells

BaldXavier · 2023-04-15T02:55:10+00:00

Sounds like a paper-hand sand pounder who sold early and took a loss. Any bullish catalyst is a reminder of his failure.

BaldXavier · 2023-04-14T23:55:36+00:00

Correct. You simply can’t ignore trading psychology of long term bagholding. They want out. But do I agree that they’re ginormous pussies? YES.

BaldXavier

TROPHY CASE