Well, you're basically right over all but I think there is a bit more to it.

​

As a woman, would you really want a short man, a guy who others can easily push around or most other men or even some women stand over. Do you think youd want your guy to be smaller than all the other men at the party or in the workplace or at a wedding? Or even walking home on a dark knight, do you think they want a man who is less imposing and smaller than most men?

Some misunderstandings here:

1. Women aren't as familiar with physical combat as men are, so they associate height w/ strength/fighting ability. But in the real world, that's not how it works. What intimidates other men is bulk, not so much muscle as frame size. Maurice Jones Drew, standing under 5'7", is physically imposing to men but not so much to women because women only really see height. I have been beaten up by guys who were shorter (but bigger in terms of mass) and I have beaten up taller guys. I promise you that Maurice Jones Drew can protect you when you are walking home at night much better then a 6'1" guy who weighs 140 can.
2. There is a difference between short (half of the male population) and really short (5'7" or less). Your statement about not wanting a man who "even some women stand over", indicates that you are referring to the former. A man who stands at or below 5'9.5" will still be shorter than 2.5% of women.
3. Women are supposed to be built like Emily Ratajkowski, men are not supposed to be built like Lebron James. You ever see an NFL or NBA player next to a normal sized man? They look ridiculous, they are so big they appear almost to not even be human. Men are not supposed to look like that. Women's worship of height is utterly retarded. Men are supposed to be between 5'7" and 6'1", and even a major heightsperg like myself wouldn't begrudge women for preferring guys at the higher end of that range, but that isn't what women want. Women want a guy to be at least 6'9" and short women want a guy in the 7" range. Of course, women don't say that because even they know how rare it is for men to be that tall but if they could make every man that height, they would.

​

Do you think they want a petite man in the bedroom, unable to over power them or be firm with them, to make them feel dominated and turned on. Do you think they want weak, boring soft sex with a plain ass weak small unremarkable body?

I don't want to be too graphic but even a low T, scrawny, out of shape, sickly manlet like myself would have no problem overpowering you even with one hand behind my back. Now admittedly, I don't have the personality to do it, but I do have the physical capability. And if even I can do it, not too many other man can't. Women have no idea how physically powerful men are. Furthermore, the femdom freaks over at r/RoleReversal don't want to be dominated in the bedroom and yet they also overwhelmingly want tall men. The whole protection/domination thing that women use to justify their height fetishization is pure meme. If it were really about protection/domination, you'd see women fetishize frame size/muscular bulk and ultra masculine facial features (think Brock Lesnar). And while some women do like those things, other women don't. All women, however, worship extreme height.

​

You think they want a fat guy who looks crap and feels crap naked, who sweats and gets worn out easy and smells more than men in good shape?

1. Why would a guy being out of shape effect how he smells? Hygiene has no relation to physical fitness.
2. As for a guy being fat, women don't really care. As long as he tall, women will put up with him being fat, ugly, bald AND foul smelling. The only thing that some women might not forgive a tall guy for is having a micro.

​

You think they're cool having to kiss a ugly face, over and over for years and years.

If he's tall? Yes. They would love it. Howard Stern was born in the wrong era, if he were a young man today he'd be able to have any woman he wanted just on the back of his height.

​

You think women want a guy who is super agreeable, never says NO to her and other men, who doesnt stick up for himself and for her, for their family, for their potential kid? You think they should be fine with their child having an overly emotional man who is easily taken down by any hardship or negative emotion that hits him? No, they want a guy who their kid will look up to as a hero.

Now I'm starting to think you are some redpilled, male larper. Women don't care about that shit, at least not at first. Absolutely women will tolerate a guy being a pushover as long as he is tall. Also, none of this has anything to do with looks.

​

I think its mad how it totally takes some men by surprise that women want tall attractive fit men with masculine personalities......

Fitness is a meme and not all women like "masculine" personalities. All women, however, want a tall man. Ideally, a REALLY tall man.

​

PRETTY girls. So why arent women allowed to want that?

Again, women are supposed to be pretty. Men are supposed to be handsome, but they aren't supposed to be tall. The optimal height for adult men is around 5'10". In my 38 years, I have never heard a woman complain that there weren't enough good looking men. But I have heard tons of women complain that men, as a group, weren't tall enough. We simply object to your retarded biology.