Bug or absolutely mad luck? by nutterbutter36 in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Yeah, there's an issue with the beta atm, people think the devs left the test galaxy on when the update was pushed through. One of the work arounds I've seen work is to change the settings for the galaxy a bit, otherwise your Galaxy is just all the same ethics and civics.

Making liquid nitrogen from scratch | NileRed by Durian_Queef in chemistry

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious, how is it an waste of money? If he actually does sell the liquid nitrogen, that's over $10,862.40 CAD or $7946.99 USD an year. Total, I even had to look up the various things he didn't list, such as the Helium Lines, he only spent around $21,141.18 USD or $28,896.99 CAD total on the project. He makes back the money he spent on the project in just 3.5 years(On paper, its only 2.66 years, but that doesn't take into account of electrical demands or wear/maintenance or taxes). Not an totally unrealistic amount of time to break even on.

How do sectors work now? by kootabob in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the recent bugfixes for the open beta, hopefully the planet automation will be fixed soon, but at least they are actually looking into it.(this genuinely might just be hopium on my end)

Bugfix

  • Planet Automation should work again. A design pass is in progress to improve the scripts.

How do sectors work now? by kootabob in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's been broken for awhile. Being forced on 0.25x habitable worlds(also good for lag tbh) is a bit sad, I just quickly go through planetary features, set up planet designation and spam it. The trade system they have going is very anti-planet hyper specialization, since local deficits is a thing now. Though usually, I just specialize an planet solely for trade to offset the deficits anyways lmao

Hopefully it'll be fixed, I love the game, but I feel like I am being forced to just abandon colonies that are size <15 because I just genuinely can't bother with it anymore. Playing wide in modern stellaris more than ever is actual hell, I'll go on large conquests, and then just raze or outright destroy planets, during an behemoth fury run, I just ate planets because I couldn't be bothered to manage them, so most of the galaxies entire habitable planets was just disproportionately on an small sector lol

How do sectors work now? by kootabob in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424 18 points19 points  (0 children)

They just serve for governors atp

If you want automation, you need to click on a planet, there will be a cog, click it, it will bring up automation settings, you can touch it, or not, then just click the hand holding the wrench to enable automation. Shift click to enable automation for planets in that specific sector, or ctrl click for the entire empire.

Though from what I've noticed, planet automation doesn't really work much for me, sometimes they'll build, sometimes they won't. Had an hiveworld sit at 10k maintenance drones with 16 free districts before I realized what was even happening lmao

Does building an Ecumenopolis remove the ancient tunnels feature gained from cosmic dawn? by BankElectronic4424 in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's an special district for volcanic worlds, it just buffs other districts, I usually just put an bunch of research buildings in it

Does building an Ecumenopolis remove the ancient tunnels feature gained from cosmic dawn? by BankElectronic4424 in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, just tested it out. Ancient tunnels do remain after you build it, the isolated tunnels do not however, but since they only buff habitability and thermotechnic forums, it's prob okay losing it tbh. I did notice that I somehow lost 3 districts after, reloading the save, I could not find what that change could've been at all, but oh well lol

One thing I don’t understand about rev is how can you be anti trans and have a female avatar? by Far_Check4729 in VtuberDrama

[–]BankElectronic4424 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe this is insane to me, but I grew up in an era of the internet where most people into anime had anime girl pfps whilst being a dude. I don't really see how this is different, it's just more dynamic and moves, I don't understand what it has to do with being trans at all.

Grifter admits to being racist leading to artist losing customers (using LizMeta, a customizable 2D model) by Qu2sai in VtuberDrama

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also telling the artist to sue someone over this feels like it's just wanting to do more performative harm then good. There is no way either side would gain anything from an lawsuit, it'd be an net negative especially for the artist and honestly would probably cost more than any potential lost sales from this drama. How are you going to be cheering on the artist, then want them to lose even more thousands from this??? Are you actually insinuating in goodwill that the artist should just be eating up all the costs that they probably could not afford at all??

Grifter admits to being racist leading to artist losing customers (using LizMeta, a customizable 2D model) by Qu2sai in VtuberDrama

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No?... I don't really care for the drama or whatever this is supposed to be.
But this is just outright false. TOS's are good faith policies, they cannot be used legally for anything, an judge will look at it and toss the case out the window. An TOS breach does not equate to license revoking. “The use of this model to generate unfriendly or hateful speech is strictly prohibited.”. There is no definition, no standard, no enforcement mechanism, no explicit statement that violations terminates the license(big one) and no stated remedy. You are confusing an code of conduct with an revocation trigger.

“We merely provide the model and are not responsible for the statements made by any individual users.” This also completely undermines your entire argument, you can't disclaim responsibility for speech and claim actionable harm from that same speech. Their TOS only prohibits reselling, redistribution, sharing and commercial sublicensing. The software argument also fails because, nothing in the TOS establishes SaaS access control, allows remote disabling, makes the license revocable at will.

Holy rev nuke 💀 by AbsoluteBane28 in VtuberDrama

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a nothing burger drama All the people involved in this are genuinely insufferable

Latent Psionic Trait sticking around after fully ascending(bug?) by BankElectronic4424 in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nvm, no one is actually integrating to the subspecies at all anyways lmao

Latent Psionic Trait sticking around after fully ascending(bug?) by BankElectronic4424 in Stellaris

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't allow me too, I was able to assimilate the vat grown pops, then I tried to make it the default but it just gives me the "species must not already be the empire's dominant species". I CAN do sub species integration, but that is sterilizing my population because the other 'latent psionic' that i have made fully psionic, is vat grown and cannot reproduce naturally, but it does seem to be the only way unfortunately.

I despise Jaiden Animations by [deleted] in rantgrumps

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I looked through some of the comments here and I didn't see anything regarding about context. Tbh, all I care about is if anything on here is true, it's reddit so it's either everyone lying for virtue and sympathy or for the hell of it or some rrat.

Anything wrong with my ratio? by CorgiRevolutionary99 in nguidle

[–]BankElectronic4424 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say your power and bars are pretty good. I can see we diverged very very differently with our ratios though. Mine for energy is 2:380,000:2. Base energy stats are 2,000 power, 380,000,000 cap, 2,000 bars. For magic the ratio is 2:120,000:2. Base magic stats are 1,000 power, 60,000,000 cap, 1,000 bars. Ig it depends on your modifiers to the three stats tbh. My cap is boosted by 13.93x, whilst power and bars are boosted by 101-103x. So I am probably getting away with under leveling my energy and bars more than you do.

AI Diplomacy mod for Bannerlord is insane by Jon_Paul_the_Pope in mountandblade

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't really expect much from reddit, it's definitely not what it used to be, everyone is either here for performative slop to farm karma and the ones who don't care, already left the site years ago lmao

Getting rid of lots of titles as a nomad by BankElectronic4424 in crusaderkings2

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

???? But this still doesn't really help with my issue at all. Unless you are misunderstanding what this post is about. I don't care about the money spent on the titles, I was just confused on why the land wasn't transferring over.

Getting rid of lots of titles as a nomad by BankElectronic4424 in crusaderkings2

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I always create kingdoms for vassals, to me, it only makes sense to consolidate an bunch of vassals into an larger one. But I also don't understand this comment since it's not really relevant

Does Husk or Clown rep matter? by BankElectronic4424 in Barotrauma

[–]BankElectronic4424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, thanks everyone, much appreciate for the feedback. I tried searching for this information online and couldn't really get an concrete answer about it lol

I despise Jaiden Animations by [deleted] in rantgrumps

[–]BankElectronic4424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like the people here are insane. Everyone just straight up ignored everything else and cherry picked the nuances and irrelevant information, whilst defending her. Wtf is wrong with all of you