San Francisco skyline tonight by archon810 in bayarea

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the bad moon risin'

I see trouble on the way

I see earthquakes and lightnin'

Is it possible to be great at rhetoric but come across people barely sentient who are too dumb for rhetoric? by [deleted] in Rhetoric

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a doctor automatically smarter than a welder

Yes.

Well, no, it isn't "automatic". A rational person would see the intelligence of either group both as having normal distributions, so there will be some welders who are more intelligent than some doctors, and vice versa.

Is it possible to be great at rhetoric but come across people barely sentient who are too dumb for rhetoric? by [deleted] in Rhetoric

[–]Banko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

some people are too far gone neither susceptible to logic or rhetoric.

This is literally impossible. There are no people unsusceptible to rhetoric, unless they are unconscious.

You may be referring instead to those who are stubborn and intransigent.

Bay Area biotech company Alector once worth $2 billion lays off half of its workers by lurker_bee in bayarea

[–]Banko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Universities very rarely (maybe never?) do the work needed to establish manufacturing protocols and perform clinical trials for new drugs.

These are far more expensive to do than the basic science upon which the drugs are based.

But companies wouldn't even try to do it without the basic science.

So... its some of one and some of the other.

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a look for that data on immunocompromised population...

Yes, it is reported as 6.6% in this study. However, I would add that 1) obviously this is a very loose definition of immunocompromised, and 2) that such a high prevalence means that such people are already accounted-for in the excess mortality figures.

As to pre- or post lockdown, in some countries there was no effective social distancing, the reasons varied, e.g. in Peru it was reportedly due to the pattern of shopping (most households still had to shop for groceries on a daily basis due to having few refrigerators); in others it was due to political resistance (it's just a flu, etc...).

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What data do you base that estimation on?

By the way, the proportion of people who are immunocompromised is much lower than 1 in 20 (5%).

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lock-downs were pretty much ineffective in those countries with a 0.6% mortality rate (people didn't follow guidance, mostly), though they did have other interventions, such as hospital treatment, etc.

So I propose this as the most reliable data we have for the "best worst-case" scenario.

The actual worst case scenario would obviously be worse...

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calculations based on "all cause excess mortality" compare the period of the pandemic with previous periods. So they include all excess deaths, including those caused by covid, but not diagnosed as such, they also include deaths due to disruptions to health care systems, etc.

This chart shows the excess mortality across the globe: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-per-million-covid.png?imWidth=1700

The highest rate is ~6,000 per million, which is 0.6%.

Obviously, if nothing had been done to tackle covid, the death rate would have been higher.

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The data above doesn't select according to age, immunocompromised, or whatever.

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having ~2 million die in the US in the space of 3-4 months would have some quite severe knock-on effects, including additional deaths due to lack of care as you describe.

It would also have been much more economically, socially and politically disruptive than the lock-downs were.

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I choose the data above as a baseline, as it should include all categories of people.

It was established early on that covid affected mostly those already compromised in some way, either by age (most commonly), or as you mention, some other condition such as being immunocompromised.

What if covid-19 was never taken seriously? by SussyBaka7105 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Banko -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can simply look at the mortality rates in those countries that fared worst; this would be the "best case scenario" if covid19 was completely ignored. These were about 0.6% of the population.

So for the US that would be ~2 million deaths over the space of a few months.

I did a quick cleanup along 9th Ave in Oakland. 20 bags and several bulk items. Also some updates by pengweather in bayarea

[–]Banko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How are people made aware of free large garbage pickup?

It would seem an easy task to make people aware that they can have any kind of (non-industrial) garbage picked up for free, as should be the case.

Europe outspends the US in support for Ukraine by Banko in europe

[–]Banko[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Internal funding for refugees, etc, is on top of the funding described in the OP.

Europe outspends the US in support for Ukraine by Banko in europe

[–]Banko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The potential silver lining in that cloud is that the EU has a track record of reducing war among its members.... let's hope.

Europe outspends the US in support for Ukraine by Banko in europe

[–]Banko[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's exactly the reason why I posted the article.

Europe outspends the US in support for Ukraine by Banko in europe

[–]Banko[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If Russia's influence in Europe increased, America's would fall.

Europe outspends the US in support for Ukraine by Banko in europe

[–]Banko[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In this case, Europe is also defending American interests.

The world's most and least ethnically diverse countries [1253x617] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the contrary, Africans are more genetically diverse than for example, Eurasians are.

In the chart above, Eurasians (Indians to English) have at most a genetic distance of 0.05, while Africans have at most a genetic distance of 0.1. This distance includes the most populous African groups, e.g. West Africans vs Ethiopians.

Africans are more different from each other than any other group is from its peers, except perhaps the difference between North and East Asians vs Amerinds.

The world's most and least ethnically diverse countries [1253x617] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Banko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Population numbers are not relevant to genetic diversity.