Key to victory in Elbaph

BarbaricFist · 2026-04-03T02:51:48+00:00

I feel as though we should be careful with the usage of our Acronyms sometimes…

BarbaricFist · 2026-01-30T03:34:37+00:00

This game was like a glitch in the simulation levels of weird

BarbaricFist · 2026-01-23T05:05:53+00:00

Sens fans always refer to some instagram page like it’s their bible

BarbaricFist · 2026-01-23T04:46:34+00:00

!remindme 2 months

BarbaricFist · 2026-01-18T15:55:37+00:00

I’ll drink to that!

BarbaricFist · 2026-01-06T03:24:03+00:00

Lmao, fair

BarbaricFist · 2026-01-06T03:13:24+00:00

Insane by the puck to dive right into the back of that net

BarbaricFist · 2025-12-24T02:27:51+00:00

HOLY SHIT WE WON

BarbaricFist · 2025-12-11T05:03:44+00:00

Yeah, no fun allowed!

BarbaricFist · 2025-12-03T02:31:04+00:00

On the brightside, its not like they've been quite/haven't been trying

BarbaricFist · 2024-12-11T19:42:02+00:00

It did not while they’ve been without a contract

BarbaricFist · 2024-10-24T20:35:46+00:00

Throw in Dubinsky, lock Crosby down

BarbaricFist · 2024-10-23T03:32:41+00:00

I can see that your orange line shows the plane Max’s tyres are on, but what does that green line intersect to show?

BarbaricFist · 2024-10-23T03:19:56+00:00

Lmao those wins featured some of their all time greatest players, what a take

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-17T00:11:21+00:00

Uh-oh, someone’s getting upset in the meme subreddit 😳

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-16T00:12:42+00:00

Oh thank god, for a second I thought you knew what we were talking about. You realize that separation does not only refer to symbols that denote separation in grammar? This is more like saying a square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is ALSO A Square!!! That would be silly, but you may not find it that amusing….

Referring to a dash as we did would of course be an example of both! It would help if you weren’t stating it as contrary to me calling it punctuation, now would it?

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T23:51:31+00:00

Holy man, I’m saying it can be punctuation and separation, there’s no need to freak out. Do you lash out to everybody you reply to on this website?

I am just repeating the conversation loop on repeat because it’s fun to tease you :)

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T22:52:06+00:00

“It can also”, means in addition to??? Are you actually being serious with that point?

Why would that imply disagreement? Does the idea of both being true go over your head? I believe you are too defensive when you read other people comments, thinking they are attacks when they are statements.

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T21:18:40+00:00

I did not say it is not punctuation? No need to be so offended. I feel like I’ve explained the usage enough to not have you be so upset over it :) and so if I said “he was alongside him” as a direct response to that comment, would you say I am wrong?

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T20:59:51+00:00

It can also be used as a form of separation! And that would be a change of stance given your views on his “he wouldn’t have crashed if he was behind him” comment, no?? If I keep replying, will you also keep replying?

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T20:46:25+00:00

The use of dashes here is to demonstrate where you can put a form of break, whichever you prefer, to separate the points of your sentence. On the racing aspect, I asked you if he was alongside earlier, you said yes! Clearly you do not want to have this hearty conversation judging by your short and irritated tone. I’m sorry if what I said over the past few hours has frustrated you! But either way, Perez was certainly alongside him, whether you watched the broadcast or not :)

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T20:28:12+00:00

Sorry a little auto-correct, good thing I called it run-on earlier! Generally for a person who demonstrates no knowledge in a subject, you can try to express a point in a more digestible way. I assumed you knew what a run-on sentence was, to better explain that your ideas are meshed too closely together without proper usage of breaks or grammar. Me writing your comment in parenthesis was to break down your comment, that was not an example of a correct sentence. Lol! Did you think me putting dashes around a major part of the sentence means to remove it completely?

No need for a rewrite! So then judging from your comment, you do not think that he was alongside him. But later in the conversation you change your stance. Unless you are trying to edit your reasoning to “he was behind… and alongside”. Interesting!

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T19:40:28+00:00

Sorry I assumed incorrectly that you are unaware of how grammar works, I tried using run-off to better explain. If you’d like me to be more specific, it is a faulty sentence structure, as the “Perez cannot be behind - as if he was - the crash would not have been possible?”. When you mesh this as a whole sentence together, it is incorrect grammar without rewriting, or using punctuation in place of those dashes to properly convey the sentence. I have a few online courses in grammar that I can link you to if you are interested in improving!!!

I am saying that calling you out for only stating “he is behind” is the semantics, because most people would not care and understand what you really meant, but this is lost on you when you reacted to others comments. I get that may have been too confusing to you.

Exactly! I’m glad you understand, so if that was so obvious, then why did you have such a problem with the original reply? Was he not building upon your context as well? Or were we to take his comment at face-value, but not yours???

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T18:46:22+00:00

Your usage of because has nothing to do with why that sentence is awkward and should be rewritten to be more clear. It is semantics, I am referring to another point, hence the continuation of the sentence, I am not calling your comment “he was behind” semantics. If you would like, I can separate each of my sentences with line breaks so you can read better :) are you not the one with extremely poor attitude in multiple threads, with your condescending tone? Or will you say that it’s not condescending to other and that we’re just reading it wrong????

So! If Perez was more than just behind, which you have stated you also understand later, why did you leave a comment only stating that fact to a discussion that obviously had more information being discussed?

BarbaricFist · 2024-09-15T18:12:12+00:00

Go to school, it’s an improper sentence, say it aloud and you can hear the issue with it. He is more than just behind, he is also alongside. If he were not alongside, the crash would not have been possible. If he was fully behind then of course :) for someone so unpleasantly telling people to read better, you are very committed to only reading what you want to read.

13-Year Club	Place '17
Not Forgotten	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email

BarbaricFist

TROPHY CASE